Using a Gradient Based Method to Seed an EMO Algorithm

In this paper, we propose an Intelligent Decision Support System (IDSS) for the design of new textile fabrics. The IDSS uses predictive analytics to estimate fabric properties (e.g., elasticity) and composition values (% cotton) and then prescriptive techniques to optimize the fabric design inputs that feed the predictive models (e.g., types of yarns used). Using thousands of data records from a Portuguese textile company, we compared two distinct Machine Learning (ML) predictive approaches: Single-Target Regression (STR), via an Automated ML (AutoML) tool, and Multi-target Regression, via a deep learning Artificial Neural Network. For the prescriptive analytics, we compared two Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization (EMO) methods (NSGA-II and R-NSGA-II) when optimizing 100 new fabrics, aiming to simultaneously minimize the physical property predictive error and the distance of the optimized values when compared with the learned input space. The two EMO methods were applied to design of 100 new fabrics. Overall, the STR approach provided the best results for both prediction tasks, with Normalized Mean Absolute Error values that range from 4% (weft elasticity) to 11% (pilling) in terms of the fabric properties and a textile composition classification accuracy of 87% when adopting a small tolerance of 0.01 for predicting the percentages of six types of fibers (e.g., cotton). As for the prescriptive results, they favored the R-NSGA-II EMO method, which tends to select Pareto curves that are associated with an average 11% predictive error and 16% distance.

Various evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) algorithms have been used in the field of evolutionary fuzzy systems (EFS), because EMO algorithms can easily handle multiple objective functions such as the accuracy maximization and complexity minimization for fuzzy system design. Most EMO algorithms used in EFS are Pareto dominance-based algorithms such as NSGA-II, SPEA2, and PAES. There are a few studies where other types of EMO algorithms are used in EFS. In this paper, we apply a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition called MOEA/D to EFS for fuzzy classifier design. MOEA/D is one of the most well-known decomposition-based EMO algorithms. The key idea is to divide a multiobjective optimization problem into a number of single-objective problems using a set of uniformly distributed weight vectors in a scalarizing function. We propose a new scalarizing function called an accuracy-oriented function (AOF) which is specialized for classifier design. We examine the effects of using AOF in MOEA/D on the search ability of our multiobjective fuzzy genetics-based machine learning (GBML). We also examine the synergy effect of MOEA/D with AOF and parallel distributed implementation of fuzzy GBML on the generalization ability.

The hypervolume indicator has frequently been used for comparing evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms. A reference point is needed for hypervolume calculation. However, its specification has not been discussed in detail from a viewpoint of fair performance comparison. A slightly worse point than the nadir point is usually used for hypervolume calculation in the EMO community. In this paper, we propose a reference point specification method for fair performance comparison of EMO algorithms. First, we discuss the relation between the reference point specification and the optimal distribution of solutions for hypervolume maximization. It is demonstrated that the optimal distribution of solutions strongly depends on the location of the reference point when a multi-objective problem has an inverted triangular Pareto front. Next, we propose a reference point specification method based on theoretical discussions on the optimal distribution of solutions. The basic idea is to specify the reference point so that a set of well-distributed solutions over the entire linear Pareto front has a large hypervolume and all solutions in such a solution set have similar hypervolume contributions. Then, we examine whether the proposed method can appropriately specify the reference point through computational experiments on various test problems. Finally, we examine the usefulness of the proposed method in a hypervolume-based EMO algorithm. Our discussions and experimental results clearly show that a slightly worse point than the nadir point is not always appropriate for performance comparison of EMO algorithms.

For more than two decades, stand-alone evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) methods have been adequately demonstrated to find a set of trade-off solutions near Pareto-front for various multi-objective optimization problems. Despite a long-standing existence of classical generative single-objective based methods, a very few EMO studies have combined the two approaches for a better gain. In this paper, we investigate the effect of seeding the initial population of an EMO algorithm with extreme solutions obtained using a single-objective method. Our proposed approach is further aided with an opposition based offspring creation mechanism which strategically places new solutions on the current Pareto frontier by a simple, yet a novel arbitration policy that utilizes the relative distances from the extreme solutions in the current population members. We conduct an extensive simulation of our proposed approach on a wide variety of two and three-objective benchmark MOP test problems. Results are shown to be remarkably better than the original EMO approach in terms of hyper-volume metric. The results are interesting and should motivate EMO researchers to integrate single-objective focused optimization and an opposition-based concept with diversity-preserving EMO procedures for an overall better performance.

In recent years, evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) algorithms have frequently been used for engineering problems with some conflicting objective functions to be simultaneously optimized. EMO algorithms can provide a number of Pareto optimal solutions to users. Two scenarios are considered in the practical use of EMO algorithms. One is that a decision maker selects a single solution from the obtained ones after the EMO process. The other is that a decision maker utilizes the solutions to analyze the relationship between design variables and objective functions of the corresponding problem. In this paper, we apply fuzzy genetics-based machine learning to the second scenario in order to generate if-then rule-based classifiers which represent the relationship between design variables and objective functions. We also utilize this method during the EMO process to pre-screen candidate offspring solutions. The classifier detects non-promising offspring solutions. Then, they are discarded before their fitness evaluation, so that the computation resource is used only for promising solutions. We apply this method to one engineering problem and examine its effect on the search performance of an EMO algorithm.

Evolutionary algorithms have been widely used to tackle multi-objective optimization problems. Despite many successful applications there is a lack of theoretical knowledge on how and why this type of algorithm works particularly well for multi-objective problems. This special issue presents current advances to the theoretical understanding of evolutionary algorithms for multi-objective optimization. It comprises four very high quality papers which have been selected via a rigorous reviewing process. The first paper “On the Effect of Populations in Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimisation” by Oliver Giel and Per Kristian Lehre studies the basic question whether a population is provably useful to compute the whole Pareto front of a multi-objective optimization problem. They compare restart strategies of several single-objective approaches based on one individual to a natural multi-objective approach using a population. Their analyses point out the benefits of the multi-objective evolutionary algorithm in a rigorous way. Using illustrative example functions they provide not only proven results but also a good intuition about why population-based approaches can outperform individual-based approaches in multi-objective optimization. The paper “Exploring the Runtime of an Evolutionary Algorithm for the Multi-Objective Shortest Path Problem” by Christian Horoba examines the behavior of evolutionary algorithms for the classical NP-hard multi-objective shortest path problem. The author considers an evolutionary approach based on -dominance and proves that this algorithm constitutes a fully polynomial-time randomized approximation scheme (FPRAS) for the problem. The algorithm achieves this by mimicking a problemspecific algorithm for that problem. This provides general insight into why evolutionary algorithms can perform well for problems that allow for efficient problem-specific algorithms. Hypervolume-based algorithms have become very popular in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In the paper, “An Efficient Algorithm for Computing Hypervolume Contributions,” Karl Bringmann and Tobias Friedrich present a faster algorithm for determining the individual with the smallest hypervolume contribution in a given population. Furthermore, they study the problem of removing λ > 1 individuals with the smallest hypervolume contribution from a given population and present an elegant and fast method to carry out this task.

Handling of many-objective problems is a hot issue in the evolutionary multiobjective optimization (EMO) community. It is well-known that frequently-used EMO algorithms such as NSGA-II and SPEA do not work well on many-objective problems whereas they have been successfully applied to a large number of test problems and real-world application tasks with two or three objectives. The main difficulty in the handling of many-objective problems is that almost all solutions in the current population of an EMO algorithm are non-dominated with each other. This means that Pareto dominance relation cannot generate enough selection pressure toward the Pareto front. As a result, Pareto dominance-based EMO algorithms such as NSGA-II and SPEA cannot drive the current population toward the Pareto front efficiently in a high-dimensional objective space of a many-objective problem. A simple idea for introducing additional selection pressure toward the Pareto front is the use of scalarizing fitness functions. In this paper, we examine the effect of using weighted sum fitness functions for parent selection and generation update on the performance of NSGA-II for many-objective 0/1 knapsack problems.

Multi-clustering via evolutionary multi-objective optimization

In a short span of about 14 years, evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) has established itself as a mature field of research and application with an extensive literature, many commercial softwares, numerous freely downloadable codes, a dedicated biannual conference running successfully four times so far since 2001, special sessions and workshops held at all major evolutionary computing conferences, and full-time researchers from universities and industries from all around the globe. In this paper, we make a brief outline of EMO principles, some EMO algorithms, and focus on current research and application potential of EMO. Besides, simply finding a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, EMO research has now diversified in hybridizing its search with multi-criterion decision-making tools to arrive at a single preferred solution, in utilizing EMO principle in solving different kinds of single-objective optimization problems efficiently, and in various interesting application domains which were not possible to be solved adequately due to the lack of a suitable solution technique.

The ensemble learning has attracted much attention over the last decade. While constructing RBF network ensemble the generally encountered problems are how to construct diverse RBF networks and how to combine outputs. The construction of RBF network can be considered as a multi-objective optimization problem regarding model complexity. A set of RBF networks which is multi-objectively optimized can be obtained by solving the above-mentioned problem. In this paper the construction of RBF networks by evolutionary multi-objective optimization method and its ensemble are considered, and it is applied to the pattern classification problem. Also some ensemble member selection methods and output combination methods are considered. Experimental study on the benchmark problem of pattern classification is carried out; then it is illustrated that the RBF network ensemble has a performance, which is comparable to that of other ensemble methods.

An improved multiobjective differential evolution based on Pareto-adaptive -dominance and orthogonal design

In the past few years, multi-objective optimization algorithms have been extensively applied in several fields including engineering design problems. A major reason is the advancement of evolutionary multi-objective optimization (EMO) algorithms that are able to find a set of non-dominated points spread on the respective Pareto-optimal front in a single simulation. Besides just finding a set of Pareto-optimal solutions, one is often interested in capturing knowledge about the variation of variable values over the Pareto-optimal front. Recent innovization approaches for knowledge discovery from Pareto-optimal solutions remain as a major activity in this direction. In this article, a different data-fitting approach for continuous parameterization of the Pareto-optimal front is presented. Cubic B-spline basis functions are used for fitting the data returned by an EMO procedure in a continuous variable space. No prior knowledge about the order in the data is assumed. An automatic procedure for detecting gaps in the Pareto-optimal front is also implemented. The algorithm takes points returned by the EMO as input and returns the control points of the B-spline manifold representing the Pareto-optimal set. Results for several standard and engineering, bi-objective and tri-objective optimization problems demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed procedure.

Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization (EMO) is a hot research direction nowadays and one of the state-of-the-art evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms ——NSGA-II has gain wide attention and application in many fields. Gene Expression Programming (GEP) has a powerful search capability, but falls into local optimum easily. Based on the transformed GEP, NSGA-II and the virus evolution mechanism, a new multi-objective evolutionary algorithm GEP Virus NSGA-II is proposed. With the infection operation of virus population, the diversity of the host population is increased, and it’s much easier to jump out of the local optimum. And this algorithm has got good experimental results on 9 standard test problems.

Within the field of evolutionary multi-objective optimization, there exists a class of problems where most evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms (EMOAs) suffer from a loss of diversity that remains unrecoverable for extended periods, namely “imbalanced problems”. Currently, the field of multi-objective optimization lacks rigorous quantitative characterization of imbalanced multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs) and systematic understanding of their impact on algorithmic performance. To address these limitations, we introduce two novel quantities: the global and local shrinkage-spread rates, which characterize population convergence and diversity dynamics during global exploration and local exploitation phases, respectively. Based on these quantities, we provide the first mathematical characterization of imbalanced MOPs and derive key theoretical properties through rigorous probabilistic analysis. Our theoretical result shows that the probability of achieving substantial diversity recovery is below 0.1 under given conditions, demonstrating that diversity recovery becomes extremely challenging once population diversity is lost. We further construct ten imbalanced MOPs in which the difficulty of maintaining population diversity can be precisely modulated through adjustable parameters. Using these benchmark problems, we conduct comparative experiments evaluating four representative EMOAs, i.e., NSGA-II, MOEA/D, RVEA, MOEA/D-M2M and DrEA, in terms of their diversity maintenance capabilities on imbalanced MOPs. The results provide both theoretical insights and practical guidance for designing robust EMOAs capable of handling imbalanced MOPs.

Archival of elite solutions is widespread practice in evolutionary multi-objective optimization. Grid-based archiving presents a compromise between accuracy and computational cost. Most grid-based archiving algorithms require apriori knowledge of the span of the Pareto front for pre-setting of the grid length or the associated parameter, grid number. Unfortunately the knowledge is often unavailable beforehand in practice. The quality of the attained non-dominated front can be very sensitive to the dimension of the grids. This paper presents a dynamic grid resizing strategy, capable of shrinking or expanding hyper grids as necessity dictates. Empirical study on two- and three-objective test functions demonstrates robust performance with respect to the initial grid sizes. Applied in the context of PAES, the adaptive archiving strategy performed well for initial grid sizes determined from a uniform random distribution. In comparison to AGA, the dynamic strategy presents improved non-dominated solutions in terms of proximity to the Pareto front and diversity for selected test problems.