• Home
  • Search
  • USING PIXEL-BASED AND OBJECT-BASED METHODS TO CLASSIFY URBAN HYPERSPECTRAL FEATURES
  • Open Access IconOpen Access
  • Cite Icon6
  • https://doi.org/10.3846/20296991.2016.1226388Copy DOI Icon

USING PIXEL-BASED AND OBJECT-BASED METHODS TO CLASSIFY URBAN HYPERSPECTRAL FEATURES

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Highlights & Summary
  • PDF
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Object-based image analysis methods have been developed recently. They have since become a very active research topic in the remote sensing community. This is mainly because the researchers have begun to study the spatial structures within the data. In contrast, pixel-based methods only use the spectral content of data. To evaluate the applicability of object-based image analysis methods for land-cover information extraction from hyperspectral data, a comprehensive comparative analysis was performed. In this study, six supervised classification methods were selected from pixel-based category, including the maximum likelihood (ML), fisher linear likelihood (FLL), support vector machine (SVM), binary encoding (BE), spectral angle mapper (SAM) and spectral information divergence (SID). The classifiers were conducted on several features extracted from original spectral bands in order to avoid the problem of the Hughes phenomenon, and obtain a sufficient number of training samples. Three supervised and four unsupervised feature extraction methods were used. Pixel based classification was conducted in the first step of the proposed algorithm. The effective feature number (EFN) was then obtained. Image objects were thereafter created using the fractal net evolution approach (FNEA), the segmentation method implemented in eCognition software. Several experiments have been carried out to find the best segmentation parameters. The classification accuracy of these objects was compared with the accuracy of the pixel-based methods. In these experiments, the Pavia University Campus hyperspectral dataset was used. This dataset was collected by the ROSIS sensor over an urban area in Italy. The results reveal that when using any combination of feature extraction and classification methods, the performance of object-based methods was better than pixel-based ones. Furthermore the statistical analysis of results shows that on average, there is almost an 8 percent improvement in classification accuracy when we use the object-based methods.

Loading PDF

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations10

High Spatial Resolution Hyperspectral Mapping for Forest Ecosystem at Tree Species Level

  • Jan 01, 2010
  • Agricultural Information Research
  • Gang Shen +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations297

Spectral information divergence for hyperspectral image analysis

  • Jun 28, 1999
  • Chein-I Chang
  • Research Article
  • Citations152

Remote sensing detection of gold related alteration zones in Um Rus area, Central Eastern Desert of Egypt

  • Oct 01, 2011
  • Advances in Space Research
  • Reda Amer +2
  • Conference Article
  • Citations3

Optimal individual supervised hyperspectral band selection distinguishing savannah trees at leaf level

  • Aug 01, 2009
  • P Debba +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations576

An information-theoretic approach to spectral variability, similarity, and discrimination for hyperspectral image analysis

  • Jan 01, 2000
  • IEEE Transactions on Information Theory
  • Chein-I Chang
  • Research Article
  • Citations775

Object-based Detailed Vegetation Classification with Airborne High Spatial Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery

  • Jul 01, 2006
  • Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
  • Qian Yu +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations16

New effective spectral matching measures for hyperspectral data analysis

  • Mar 22, 2021
  • International Journal of Remote Sensing
  • Chandan Kumar +3
  • Conference Article
  • Citations47

Graph-cut-based model for spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images

  • Jun 24, 2014
  • Yuliya Tarabalka +1
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations3

SYNERGETICS FRAMEWORK FOR HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE CLASSIFICATION

  • May 02, 2013
  • The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • R Müller +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Detection of asbestos-based cement rooftops in conflict-affected settings using EnMAP hyperspectral data: a research article

  • Jul 07, 2025
  • Scientific Reports
  • Jonti Evan Shepherd +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Comparison of Spectral Classification Methods in Water Quality

  • Jun 29, 2018
  • Cumhuriyet Science Journal
  • Önder Gürsoy +1
  • Conference Article
  • Citations10

Hyperspectral superpixel extraction using boundary updates based on optimal spectral similarity metric

  • Jul 01, 2015
  • Akin Caliskan +2
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Utilization of Pisar L-2 Data for Land Cover Classification in Forest Area Using Pixel-Based and Object-Based Methods

  • Apr 29, 2015
  • The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
  • B Trisakti +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

Processamento e integração de imagens multiespectrais, de radar e aerogeofísicas do bloco serra leste (Carajás, PA) e discussão do potencial para mineralização de ferro

  • Jun 01, 2008
  • Revista Brasileira de Geofísica
  • Thais Andressa Carrino +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations4

Performance of Sentinel-2A Remote Sensing System for Urban Area Mapping in Malaysia via Pixel-Based and OBIA Methods

  • Oct 30, 2021
  • Trends in Sciences
  • Adhwa Amir Tan +2
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.