Variation of conditional mean and its application in ultrahigh dimensional feature screening

It is a common saying that testing for conditional independence, that is, testing whether whether two random vectors $X$ and $Y$ are independent, given $Z$, is a hard statistical problem if $Z$ is a continuous random variable (or vector). In this paper, we prove that conditional independence is indeed a particularly difficult hypothesis to test for. Valid statistical tests are required to have a size that is smaller than a pre-defined significance level, and different tests usually have power against a different class of alternatives. We prove that a valid test for conditional independence does not have power against any alternative. Given the nonexistence of a uniformly valid conditional independence test, we argue that tests must be designed so their suitability for a particular problem may be judged easily. To address this need, we propose in the case where $X$ and $Y$ are univariate to nonlinearly regress $X$ on $Z$, and $Y$ on $Z$ and then compute a test statistic based on the sample covariance between the residuals, which we call the generalised covariance measure (GCM). We prove that validity of this form of test relies almost entirely on the weak requirement that the regression procedures are able to estimate the conditional means $X$ given $Z$, and $Y$ given $Z$, at a slow rate. We extend the methodology to handle settings where $X$ and $Y$ may be multivariate or even high dimensional. While our general procedure can be tailored to the setting at hand by combining it with any regression technique, we develop the theoretical guarantees for kernel ridge regression. A simulation study shows that the test based on GCM is competitive with state of the art conditional independence tests. Code is available as the R package $\mathtt{GeneralisedCovarianceMeasure}$ on CRAN.

Testing a Class of Semi- or Nonparametric Conditional Moment Restriction Models using Series Methods

Based on benchmarking various methods and analyzing multiple real scRNA-seq datasets, a computational platform/workflow and a set of tips for best practices are developed for analyzing causal interactions or relationships in single cells.

A consistent characteristic function-based test for conditional independence

Hypothesis tests

Causal knowledge is vital for effective reasoning in science, as causal relations, unlike correlations, allow one to reason about the outcomes of interventions. Algorithms that can discover causal relations from observational data are based on the assumption that all variables have been jointly measured in a single dataset. In many cases this assumption fails. Previous approaches to overcoming this shortcoming devised algorithms that returned all joint causal structures consistent with the conditional independence information contained in each individual dataset. But, as conditional independence tests only determine causal structure up to Markov equivalence, the number of consistent joint structures returned by these approaches can be quite large. The last decade has seen the development of elegant algorithms for discovering causal relations beyond conditional independence, which can distinguish among Markov equivalent structures. In this work we adapt and extend these so-called bivariate causal discovery algorithms to the problem of learning consistent causal structures from multiple datasets with overlapping variables belonging to the same generating process, providing a sound and complete algorithm that outperforms previous approaches on synthetic and real data.

A Two-Step First Difference Estimator for a Panel Data Tobit Model Under Conditional Mean Independence Assumptions

We propose a market timing test for conditional mean independence of financial returns. The new excess predictability (EP) test statistic has an interpretation of a properly normalized return of a certain trading strategy. We discuss similarities of the EP test to the popular directional accuracy (DA) test of Pesaran and Timmermann. Power properties of the EP test are advantageous, and size properties are comparable to those of the DA test. We illustrate application of the test using weekly data on the S&P500 index.

In the genotyped-proband design, a proband is selected based on an observed phenotype, the genotype of the proband is observed, and then the phenotypes of all first-degree relatives are obtained. The genotypes of these first-degree relatives are not observed. Gail et al. [(1999) Genet Epidemiol] discuss likelihood analysis of this design under the assumption that the phenotypes are conditionally independent of one another given the observed and unobserved genotypes. Li and Thompson [(1997) Biometrics 53:282–293] give an example where this assumption is suspect, thus suggesting that it is important to develop tests for conditional independence. In this paper, we develop a score test for the conditional independence assumption in models that might include covariates or observation of genotypes for some of the first degree relatives. The problem can be cast more generally as one of score testing in the presence of missing covariates. A standard analysis would require specifying a distribution for the covariates, which is not convenient and could lead to a lack of model-robustness. We show that by considering a natural conditional likelihood, and basing the score test on it, a simple analysis results. The methods are applied to a study of the penetrance for breast cancer of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations among Ashkenazi Jews. Genet. Epidemiol. 18:293–306, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Conditional independence (CI) testing is an important problem, especially in causal discovery. Most testing methods assume that all variables are fully observable and then test the CI among the observed data. Such an assumption is often untenable beyond applications dealing with, e.g., psychological analysis about the mental health status and medical diagnosing (researchers need to consider the existence of latent variables in these scenarios); and typically adopted latent CI test schemes mainly suffer from robust or efficient issues. Accordingly, this article investigates the problem of testing CI between latent variables. To this end, we offer an auxiliary regression-based CI (AReCI) test by taking the measured variable as the surrogate variable of the latent variables to conduct the regression over the latent variables under the linear causal models, in which each latent variable has some certain measured variables. Specifically, given a pair of latent variables LX and LY , and a corresponding latent variable set LO , [Formula: see text] holds if and only if [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are statistically independent, where A' and A'' are the two disjoint subset of the measured variable for the corresponding latent variables, A'{LO} ∩A''{LO} = ∅ , and ω1 is a parameter vector characterized from the cross covariance between A{LX} and A'{LO} , and ω2 is a parameter vector characterized from the cross covariance between A{LY} and A''{LO} . We theoretically show that the AReCI test is capable of addressing both Gaussian and non-Gaussian data. In addition, we find that the well-known partial correlation test can be seen as a special case of the AReCI test. Finally, we devise a causal discovery method by using the AReCI test as the CI test. The experimental results on synthetic and real-world data illustrate the effectiveness of our method.

Robust feature screening for elliptical copula regression model

Recently, regression based conditional independence (CI) tests have been employed to solve the problem of causal discovery. These methods provide an alternative way to test for CI by transforming CI to independence between residuals. Generally, it is nontrivial to check for independence when these residuals are linearly uncorrelated. With the ability to represent high-order moments, kernel-based methods are usually used to achieve this goal, but at a cost of considerable time. In this paper, we investigate the independence between two linear combinations under linear non-Gaussian structural equation model (SEM). We show that generally the 1-st to 4-th moments of the two linear combinations contain enough information to infer whether or not they are independent. The proposed method provides a simpler but more effective way to measure CIs, with only calculating the 1-st to 4-th moments of the input variables. When applied to causal discovery, the proposed method outperforms kernel-based methods in terms of both speed and accuracy. which is validated by extensive experiments.

Network psychometrics uses graphical models to assess the network structure of psychological variables. An important task in their analysis is determining which variables are unrelated in the network, i.e., are independent given the rest of the network variables. This conditional independence structure is a gateway to understanding the causal structure underlying psychological processes. Thus, it is crucial to have an appropriate method for evaluating conditional independence and dependence hypotheses. Bayesian approaches to testing such hypotheses allow researchers to differentiate between absence of evidence and evidence of absence of connections (edges) between pairs of variables in a network. Three Bayesian approaches to assessing conditional independence have been proposed in the network psychometrics literature. We believe that their theoretical foundations are not widely known, and therefore we provide a conceptual review of the proposed methods and highlight their strengths and limitations through a simulation study. We also illustrate the methods using an empirical example with data on Dark Triad Personality. Finally, we provide recommendations on how to choose the optimal method and discuss the current gaps in the literature on this important topic.

Chapter 1 - Introduction

Default Count-Based Network Models for Credit Contagion