- Research Article
24
- 10.1163/156852875x00012
Democritus on Visual Perception: Two Theories or One?
- Jan 01, 1975
- Phronesis
- Richard W Baldes
The bulk of our information on Democritus' theory of visual perception comes from Theophrastus' De Sensibus. The claim is made that Theophrastus' account provides the grounds for attributing to Democritus a theory of visual perception which involves the following: a thin atomic 'image' leaves the physical object on its way toward the pet cipient; at the same time a 'visual ray' leaves the eye of the percipient toward the physical object; the 'image' and the 'ray' meet in midair, compress, and impress the air between them to form a new atomic entity which then travels to the eye of the pei cipient, and is thus seen by him. One might note that the presence of air midway between the object and the percipient is essential to the operation of this process. Ak problem arises from the fact that Aristotle cites Democritus as claiming that a person could see an insect on the vault of the heavens accurately, if there were void in between the insect and the viewer et ykvovto xevv o'0 s u'.' If we take the word xtv6v strictly and naturally to exclude air, then Aristotle's account quite clearly implies that air intervening between the physical object and the percipient is not required by Democritus' theory. Thus, an apparent contradiction arises between these reports: Theophrastus seems to say that such air is essential, while Aristotle implies that it is not. Various devices have been adopted to cope with this apparent contradiction. One such device is to ignore it, to cite both accounts without even noting the apparent contradiction or explaining what is involved.2 As far as I know, the only serious attempt to leconcile these differences is the positing of two theories of vision for Democritus
Read more