Volume uncertainty assessment method of asteroid models from disc-integrated visual photometry

Bayesian methods for model uncertainty analysis with application to future sea level rise.

In this study, a factorial multimodel Bayesian copula (FMBC) method is proposed to investigate various uncertainties in the copula-based multivariate risk models and further track the major contributors to the imprecise predictions for different risk indices. In FMBC, the copula models with different marginals and dependence structures will be firstly established with the parameter uncertainties being quantified by the adaptive Metropolis algorithm. A multilevel factorial analysis approach is then adopted to characterize the individual and interactive effects of marginals, copula functions and the associated parameter uncertainties on different risk indices. Moreover, a copula-based dependent sampling algorithm is proposed in the factorial analysis process to generate parameter samples under consideration of their correlation. The applicability of the FMBC approach is demonstrated through the multivariate flood risk analysis at two gauging stations in Wei River basin. The results indicate that extensive fluctuation exists in the inferences of multivariate return periods resulting from different marginal and dependence structures as well as the associated parameter uncertainties. For risk indices of the failure probabilities in AND and Kendall, their predictive variability can be mainly attributed to the uncertainties in model parameters and copula structure, with their total contribution more than 75%. In comparison, the failure probability in OR would be mainly influenced by the parameter uncertainty and also marginal structures, with their total contribution more than 80%. The copula structure would not have a visible effect on the failure probability in OR, with its contribution less than 5% for most scenarios. The obtained results can provide scientific support for reliable hydrological risk inferences within a multivariate context.

Hydrologic and water quality models (HWQMs) are increasingly used to support decisions on various environmental issues and policy directions for present and future scenarios, at scales varying from watershed to continental levels. Uncertainty associated with such models may affect the ability of the models to accurately evaluate the response of complex systems, leading to misguided assessments and risk management decisions. Current well-known HWQMs contain numerous input parameters, many of which are not known with certainty, and in other cases model users can hardly recognize the genesis of uncertainty. Uncertainty in data, model structure, and model parameters can propagate throughout model runs, causing the model output to substantially deviate from the expected response of the natural system. Various uncertainty assessment methods have been used with different HWQMs, creating concerns about an adequate approach for handling uncertainty in these models and how such an approach can be implemented across various discretization complexities and scales. In this article, our primary intention is to review uncertainty in the currently used HWQMs and to provide guidance and useful information for researchers and investigators. In this regard, we explore the genesis of uncertainty in hydrologic and water quality modeling (i.e., spatiotemporal scales, model representation, model discretization, model parameterization) and provide strategies for assessing uncertainty in hydrologic and water quality modeling on local and global scales when interpreting the model output.

Summary Active control is an alternative method to suppress the civil structural vibration, which is more effective than the passive control or strengthening the structural components. The performance of active control is dependent on the control strategy and the accuracy of the structural model. However, there always exist some uncertainties in the model, such as mass, damping and stiffness uncertainties. This paper presents a robust H∞ controller design for civil structures with consideration of the parametric uncertainties. The formulation to extract the parametric uncertainties from the structural model matrices is proposed through the linear fractional transformations approach. The robust H∞ controller design for the civil structures with the parametric uncertainties is achieved through the D-K iteration method. The linear matrix inequality is then used in the H∞ optimization procedure of the D-K iteration. The robustness of the controller is first numerically validated by a four-story building example and then experimentally corroborated by a shaking table test of a two-story frame with one active mass damper. The results show that the robust H∞ controller can consider the parametric uncertainties in the civil structural model and achieve the robust performance. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Probabilistic methods for addressing uncertainty and variability in biological models: application to a toxicokinetic model

This report presents guidelines for evaluating uncertainty in mathematical equations and computer models applied to assess human health and environmental risk. Uncertainty analyses involve the propagation of uncertainty in model parameters and model structure to obtain confidence statements for the estimate of risk and identify the model components of dominant importance. Uncertainty analyses are required when there is no a priori knowledge about uncertainty in the risk estimate and when there is a chance that the failure to assess uncertainty may affect the selection of wrong options for risk reduction. Uncertainty analyses are effective when they are conducted in an iterative mode. When the uncertainty in the risk estimate is intolerable for decision-making, additional data are acquired for the dominant model components that contribute most to uncertainty. This process is repeated until the level of residual uncertainty can be tolerated. A analytical and numerical methods for error propagation are presented along with methods for identifying the most important contributors to uncertainty. Monte Carlo simulation with either Simple Random Sampling (SRS) or Latin Hypercube Sampling (LHS) is proposed as the most robust method for propagating uncertainty through either simple or complex models. A distinction is made between simulating a stochastically varying assessment endpoint (i.e., the distribution of individual risks in an exposed population) and quantifying uncertainty due to lack of knowledge about a fixed but unknown quantity (e.g., a specific individual, the maximally exposed individual, or the mean, median, or 95%-tile of the distribution of exposed individuals). Emphasis is placed on the need for subjective judgement to quantify uncertainty when relevant data are absent or incomplete.

Uncertainty in structural dynamics: Experimental validation of a Wishart random matrix model

An Expert System Approach to Model Uncertainty

Abstract. Sensitivity analysis of atmospheric models is necessary to identify the processes that lead to uncertainty in model predictions, to help understand model diversity through comparison of driving processes, and to prioritise research. Assessing the effect of parameter uncertainty in complex models is challenging and often limited by CPU constraints. Here we present a cost-effective application of variance-based sensitivity analysis to quantify the sensitivity of a 3-D global aerosol model to uncertain parameters. A Gaussian process emulator is used to estimate the model output across multi-dimensional parameter space, using information from a small number of model runs at points chosen using a Latin hypercube space-filling design. Gaussian process emulation is a Bayesian approach that uses information from the model runs along with some prior assumptions about the model behaviour to predict model output everywhere in the uncertainty space. We use the Gaussian process emulator to calculate the percentage of expected output variance explained by uncertainty in global aerosol model parameters and their interactions. To demonstrate the technique, we show examples of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) sensitivity to 8 model parameters in polluted and remote marine environments as a function of altitude. In the polluted environment 95 % of the variance of CCN concentration is described by uncertainty in the 8 parameters (excluding their interaction effects) and is dominated by the uncertainty in the sulphur emissions, which explains 80 % of the variance. However, in the remote region parameter interaction effects become important, accounting for up to 40 % of the total variance. Some parameters are shown to have a negligible individual effect but a substantial interaction effect. Such sensitivities would not be detected in the commonly used single parameter perturbation experiments, which would therefore underpredict total uncertainty. Gaussian process emulation is shown to be an efficient and useful technique for quantifying parameter sensitivity in complex global atmospheric models.

For a complex hydrologic system with multiple processes and process interactions, global sensitivity analysis is often used to identify important or influential parameters for model development and improvement. The identification is complicated by process model uncertainty, when a system process can be represented by multiple process models. This study develops a new total‐effect process sensitivity index to identify influential processes under model uncertainty. This is done by extending Sobol's total‐effect parameter sensitivity index for one system model to total‐effect process sensitivity index for multiple system models to account for uncertainty in process models and model parameters. The total‐effect process sensitivity index includes not only the first‐order process sensitivity index for measuring the importance of individual processes but also higher‐order indices that account for process interactions. The total‐effect process sensitivity index can identify an influential process that itself and its interactions with other processes influence a model output. The total‐effect process sensitivity index is applied to two numerical examples: (a) Sobol's G*‐functions with analytical solutions of first‐order and total‐effect process sensitivity indices, and (b) groundwater flow models with interactions between recharge, geology, and snowmelt processes. The second evaluation shows that, due to second‐order and higher‐order process interactions, the first‐order and total‐effect process sensitivity indices give different process ranking. It is thus necessary to estimate both first‐order and total‐effect process sensitivity indices to appreciate the difference between the first‐order impact of a process alone and the overall total‐effect impact of the process itself and its interactions with other processes on a model output.

The United Nations Environment Program has recently developed criteria to identify and restrict chemicals with a potential for persistence and long-range transport (persistent organic pollutants or POPs). There are many stakeholders involved, and the issues are not only scientific but also include social, economic, and political factors. This work focuses on one aspect of the POPs debate, the criteria for determining the potential for long-range transport (LRT). Our goal is to determine if current models are reliable enough to support decisions that classify a chemical based on the LRT potential. We examine the robustness of two multimedia fate models for determining the relative ranking and absolute spatial range of various chemicals in the environment. We also consider the effect of parameter uncertainties and the model uncertainty associated with the selection of an algorithm for gas-particle partitioning on the model results. Given the same chemical properties, both models give virtually the same ranking. However, when chemical parameter uncertainties and model uncertainties such as particle partitioning are considered, the spatial range distributions obtained for the individual chemicals overlap, preventing a distinct rank order. The absolute values obtained for the predicted spatial range or travel distance differ significantly between the two models for the uncertainties evaluated. We find that to evaluate a chemical when large and unresolved uncertainties exist, it is more informative to use two or more models and include multiple types of uncertainty. Model differences and uncertainties must be explicitly confronted to determine how the limitations of scientific knowledge impact predictions in the decision-making process.

Position-force control is challenging for redundant manipulators, especially for the ones considering both joint physical limitations and model uncertainties. In this chapter, we considered adaptive motion-force control of redundant manipulators with uncertainties of the interaction model and physical parameters. The whole control problem is formulated as a QP equation with a set of equality and inequality constraints, where based on admittance control strategy, the desired motion-force task is combined with the kinematic property of redundant manipulators, corresponding to an equality constraint in the formed QP equation. Moreover, the uncertainties of both system model and physical parameters are also considered, together with the complicated joint physical structure constraints, formulating as a set of inequality constraints. Then an adaptive recurrent neural network is designed to solve the QP problem online. This control scheme generalizes recurrent neural network based kinematic control of manipulators to that of position-force control, which opens a new avenue to shift position-force control of manipulators from pure control perspective to cross design with both convergence and optimality consideration. Numerical results on a 7-DOF manipulator LBR iiwa and comparisons with existing methods show the validity of the proposed control method.

Parameter uncertainty in hydrologic modeling is commonly evaluated, but assessing the impact of spatial input data uncertainty in spatially descriptive ‘distributed’ models is not common. This study compares the significance of uncertainty in spatial input data and model parameters on the output uncertainty of a distributed hydrology and sediment transport model, HYdrology Simulation using Time-ARea method (HYSTAR). The Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis (SCEM-UA) algorithm was used to quantify parameter uncertainty of the model. Errors in elevation and land cover layers were simulated using the Sequential Gaussian/Indicator Simulation (SGS/SIS) techniques and then incorporated into the model to evaluate their impact on the outputs relative to those of the parameter uncertainty. This study demonstrated that parameter uncertainty had a greater impact on model output than did errors in the spatial input data. In addition, errors in elevation data had a greater impact on model output than did errors in land cover data. Thus, for the HYSTAR distributed hydrologic model, accuracy and reliability can be improved more effectively by refining parameters rather than further improving the accuracy of spatial input data and by emphasizing the topographic data over the land cover data.

Utilizing degraded quality waters such as saline water as irrigation water with proper management methods such as leaching application is a potential answer to water scarcity in agricultural systems. Leaching application requires understanding the relationship between the amount of irrigation water and its quality with the dynamic of salts in the soil. The HYDRUS-1D model can simulate the dynamic of soil salinity under saline water irrigation conditions. However, these simulations are subject to uncertainty. A study was conducted to assess the uncertainty of the HYDRUS-1D model parameters and outputs to simulate the dynamic of salts under saline water irrigation conditions using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) based Metropolis-Hastings algorithm in the R-Studio environment. Results indicated a low level of uncertainty in parameters related to the advection term (water movement simulation) and water stress reduction function for root water uptake in the solute transport process. However, a higher level of uncertainty was detected for dispersivity and diffusivity parameters, possibly because of the study’s scale or some error in initial or boundary conditions. The model output (predictive) uncertainty showed a high uncertainty in dry periods compared to wet periods (under irrigation or rainfall). The uncertainty in model parameters was the primary source of total uncertainty in model predictions. The implementation of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for the HYDRUS-1D was able to conveniently estimate the residual water content (θr) value for the water simulation processes. The model’s performance in simulating soil water content and soil water electrical conductivity (ECsw) was good when tested with the 50% quantile of the posterior distribution of the parameters. Uncertainty assessment in this study revealed the effectiveness of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm in exploring uncertainty aspects of the HYDRUS-1D model for reproducing soil salinity dynamics under saline water irrigation at a field scale.

Approaches for Economic Evaluations of Health Care Technologies