Waste compatibility assessments to support project W-320

This research explores estimating off-shore oily waste, considering waste-waste compatibility due to the heterogeneous nature of oily waste. Firstly, hyperparameters for Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Support Vector Regression (SVR), and Improved Random Forest (IRF) models are optimized to develop a comprehensive oily waste estimation model incorporating liquid, solid, and total waste types. The results show that IRF is the most accurate model, with the lowest error indices and a higher correlation coefficient compared to ANN and SVR. This study then takes a step further to propose a waste allocation framework, which is tested using information on the Bella Bella oil spill incident in British Columbia. Incorporating treatment and receiving facilities' details, such as their location and capacity, the framework distinguishes all possible waste pathways for handling the waste from source to landfill. Genetic Algorithm (GA) is introduced to optimize waste transfer processes and successfully minimize transportation costs. The results show that the model can find the most optimized path to reduce transportation costs. The model's high customization, adaptability, and capacity to consider multiple nodes make it suitable for complex waste transfer networks, demonstrating its practicality in emergency situations. Efficiently allocating resources and ensuring cost-effective waste transportation while considering facility capacities and waste compatibility, the study holds practical implications for waste management practitioners, environmental authorities, and response teams.,

There are 177 waste storage tanks containing over 210,000 m{sup 3} (55 million gal) of mixed waste at the Hanford Site. The River Protection Project (RPP) has adopted the data quality objective (DQO) process used by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (EPA 1994a) and implemented by RPP internal procedure (Banning 1999a) to identify the information and data needed to address safety issues. This DQO document is based on several documents that provide the technical basis for inputs and decision/action levels used to develop the decision rules that evaluate the transfer of wastes. A number of these documents are presently in the process of being revised. This document will need to be revised if there are changes to the technical criteria in these supporting documents. This DQO process supports various documents, such as sampling and analysis plans and double-shell tank (DST) waste analysis plans. This document identifies the type, quality, and quantity of data needed to determine whether transfer of supernatant can be performed safely. The requirements in this document are designed to prevent the mixing of incompatible waste as defined in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 173-303-040. Waste transfers which meet the requirements contained in this document and the Double-Shell Tank Waste Analysis Plan (Mulkey 1998) are considered to be compatible, and prevent the mixing of incompatible waste.

This engineering analysis calculates minimum slurry transport velocities intended to maintain suspensions of solid particulate in slurries. This transport velocity is also known as the slurry flow critical velocity. It is not universally recognized that a transfer line flow velocity in excess of the slurry critical velocity is a requirement to prevent solids deposition and possible line plugging. However, slurry critical velocity seems to be the most prevalent objective measure to prevent solids deposition in transfer lines. The following critical velocity correlations from the literature are investigated: Durand (1953), Spells (1955), Sinclair (1962), Zandi and Gavatos (1967), Babcock (1968), Shook (1969), and Oroskar and Turian (1980). The advantage of these critical velocity correlations is that their use is not reliant upon any measure of bulk slurry viscosity. The input parameters are limited to slurry phase densities and mass fractions, pipe diameter, particle diameter, and viscosity of the pure liquid phase of the slurry. Consequently, the critical velocity calculation does not require determination of system pressure drops. Generalized slurry properties can, therefore, be recommended if the slurry can be adequately described by these variables and if the liquid phase viscosity is known. Analysis of these correlations are presented, indicating that the Oroskar and Turian (1980) models appear to be more conservative for smaller particulate sizes, typically those less than 100 microns diameter. This analysis suggests that the current Tank Farms waste compatibility program criteria may be insufficient to prevent particulate solids settling within slurry composition ranges currently allowed by the waste compatibility program. However, in order to relate a critical velocity associated with a certain slurry composition to a system limit, a means of relating the system capabilities to the slurry composition must be found. Generally, this means expressing the bulk or effective viscosity of the slurry being transferred to some more readily obtainable variable, such as slurry density or solids concentration. No universally recognized model exists to accomplish this, and there is great uncertainty among results from those models that do exist. Following this analysis of critical velocity correlations, a recommendation is made to revise the waste transfer compatibility program criteria relating to solids transport. The new criteria states that a special engineering evaluation is required for any waste transfer that involves particulate solid transport. This evaluation is needed to gain a measure of confidence that the critical velocity for a given slurry composition is within the capabilities of the transfer system.

Newer Aspects of Waste Treatment

This document contains Technical Safety Requirements (TSRs) for the Radioactive and Hazardous Waste Management (RHWM) Division's B695 Segment of the Decontamination and Waste Treatment Facility (DWTF) at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). The TSRs constitute requirements regarding the safe operation of the B695 Segment of the DWTF. The TSRs are derived from the Documented Safety Analysis (DSA) for the B695 Segment of the DWTF (LLNL 2004). The analysis presented there determined that the B695 Segment of the DWTF is a low-chemical hazard, Hazard Category 3, nonreactor nuclear facility. The TSRs consist primarily of inventory limits as well as controls to preserve the underlying assumptions in the hazard analyses. Furthermore, appropriate commitments to safety programs are presented in the administrative controls section of the TSRs. The B695 Segment of the DWTF (B695 and the west portion of B696) is a waste treatment and storage facility located in the northeast quadrant of the LLNL main site. The approximate area and boundary of the B695 Segment of the DWTF are shown in the B695 Segment of the DWTF DSA. Activities typically conducted in the B695 Segment of the DWTF include container storage, lab-packing, repacking, overpacking, bulking, sampling, waste transfer, and waste treatment. B695 is used to store and treat radioactive, mixed, and hazardous waste, and it also contains equipment used in conjunction with waste processing operations to treat various liquid and solid wastes. The portion of the building called Building 696 Solid Waste Processing Area (SWPA), also referred to as B696S in this report, is used primarily to manage solid radioactive waste. Operations specific to the SWPA include sorting and segregating low-level waste (LLW) and transuranic (TRU) waste, lab-packing, sampling, and crushing empty drums that previously contained LLW. A permit modification for B696S was submitted to DTSC in January 2004 to store and treat hazardous and mixed waste. Upon approval of the permit modification, B696S rooms 1007, 1008, and 1009 will be able to store hazardous and mixed waste for up to 1 year. Furthermore, an additional drum crusher and a Waste Packaging Unit will be permitted to treat hazardous and mixed waste. RHWM generally processes LLW with no, or extremely low, concentrations of transuranics (i.e., much less than 100 nCi/g). Wastes processed often contain only depleted uranium and beta- and gamma-emitting nuclides, e.g., {sup 90}Sr, {sup 137}Cs, {sup 3}H. Chapter 5 of the DSA documents the derivation of TSRs and develops the operational limits that protect the safety envelope defined for this facility. The DSA is applicable to the handling of radioactive waste stored and treated in the B695 Segment of the DWTF. Section 5 of the TSR, Administrative Controls, contains those Administrative Controls necessary to ensure safe operation of the B695 Segment of the DWTF. A basis explanation follows each of the requirements described in Section 5.5, Specific Administrative Controls. The basis explanation does not constitute an additional requirement, but is intended as an expansion of the logic and reasoning behind development of the requirement. Programmatic Administrative Controls are addressed in Section 5.6.

Waste water from angle preparation enterprises originates from several sources, including emptying angles, dressing, liquefying water from ice dissolution, washing equipment and utensils, treating with additional substances, and cleaning and disinfecting offices and spaces. Water is used not only to clean angles but also to wash blood, sludge, and offal from the surfaces of various handling equipment, utensils, floors, and sump pumps. The majority of computerized handling supplies come with a water shower framework that may clean hardware and remove offal. The emergence of these forms in tall water use also leads to the mixing of blood and offal in the wash water. Fish handling waste water is full of significant pollutants that are colloidal, soluble, and particulate. Features of waste water produced depend on the type of angle used for preparation, the preparation method, and the final object placed. When handling operations such as minor (angle washing or cleaning), mild (angle filet preparation), and severe (surimi planning), the degree of defilement can change. Fish waste water must have exceptionally high levels of nitrogen, fat, oil, and oil (Mist), as well as biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). In order to reduce shameful waste transfer in the environment, this extended show introduces angle waste management processors to the concepts of fishery waste categorization and the many types of treatment used. This topic includes many aspects of angle waste, separate management of fluid angle waste and strong waste using chemicals, Indore composting technique, and suitable transfer.

Potato production and processing are very important activities in the agricultural economy of the Pacific Northwest. Part of the reason for the development of this industry has been the availability of water for both growing and processing. A great amount of water is used in processing potato products, such as frozen French fries, and the waste water is a pollutant because it contains high levels of nitrate and other nutrients. Using this waste water to irrigate the fields can be a suitable disposal method. Field application will reduce potato fertilizer costs, but it can also cause underground water contamination if over-applied to the field. In this econometric study, we used field data associated with current waste water applications in central Washington to examine the yield response as well as the soil nitrogen content response to waste water applications. Our results from the production model show that both water and nitrogen positively affect crop yields at the current levels of application, but potassium has been over applied. This implies that replacing some waste water with fresh water and nitrogen fertilizer will increase production. The environmental model results show that applying more nitrogen to the soil leads to more movement below the root zone. The results also suggest that higher crop yields lead to less nitrogen in the soil, and applying more water increases crop yields, which can reduce the nitrogen left in the soil. Therefore, relative to the current practice, waste water application rates should be reduced and supplemented with fresh water to enhance nitrogen use by plants and reduce residual nitrogen in the soil.

Flushing transfer pipe after radioactive waste transfers generates thousands of gallons of additional radioactive waste each year at the Hanford site. The use of pneumatic pigging with waste soluble pigs as a means to clear transfer piping may be an effective alternative to raw water flushes. A feasibility study was performed by a group of senior mechanical engineering students for their senior design project as part of their curriculum at Washington State university. The students divided the feasibility study into three sub-projects involving: (1) materials research, (2) delivery system design, and (3) mockup fabrication and testing. The students screened through twenty-three candidate materials and selected a thermoplastic polymer combined 50:50 wt% with sucrose to meet the established material performance criteria. The students also prepared a conceptual design of a remote pneumatic delivery system and constructed a mockup section of transfer pipe for testing the prototype pigs.

<div class="htmlview paragraph">European engine oil requirements differ from those of North American. The paper reviews the current European passenger car and commercial vehicle service fill requirements. These are largely built on a core of ASTM tests but with additional European test requirements to cover specific performance areas not addressed or not adequately covered by API Service Station and Commercial Service categories. Recent and expected changes on the European scene are discussed and a look is taken at the future.</div>

The US. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office (DOE-RL) has initiated Phase 1 of a two-phase privatization strategy for treatment and immobilization of low-activity waste (LAW) currently being managed by the Hanford Tank Waste Remediation System (TWRS) Project. In this strategy, DOE will purchase services from a contractor-owned and operated facility under a fixed price. The Phase 1 TWRS privatization contract requires that the Project Hanford Management Contract (PHMC) contractors, on behalf of DOE, deliver LAW feed in specified quantities and composition to the Privatization Contractor in a timely manner (DOE-RL 1996). Additional requirements are imposed by the interface control document (ICD-19) for LAW feed (PHMC 1997). In response to these requirements, the Tank Waste Remediation System Operation and Utilization Plan (TWRSO and UP) (Kirkbride et al. 1997) was prepared by the PHMC. The TWRSO and UP, as updated by the Readiness-To-Proceed deliverable (Payne et al. 1998), establishes the baseline operating scenario for the delivery of LAW feed to the Privatization Contractor. The scenario specifies tanks from which LAW will be provided for each feed batch, the operational activities needed to prepare and deliver each batch, and the timing of these activities. The operating scenario was developed based on current knowledge of waste composition and chemistry, waste transfer methods, and operating constraints, such as tank farm logistics and availability of tank space. A project master baseline schedule (PMBS) has been developed to implement the operating scenario. The PMBS also includes activities aimed at reducing programmatic risks. One of the activities, ''Confirm Plans and Requirements,'' was identified to verify the basis used to develop the scenario. Additional data on waste quantity, physical and chemical characteristics, and transfer properties will be needed to support this activity. This document describes the data quality objective (DQO) process undertaken to assme appropriate data will be collected to support the activity, ''Confirm Tank Plans and Requirements.'' The DQO process was implemented in accordance with the TWRS DQO process (Banning 1997) with some modifications to accommodate project or tank-specific requirements and constraints.

Buffering distance between hazardous waste landfill and water supply wells in a shallow aquifer

Waste stowage and water reclamation is vital for long-duration space exploration missions. Current primary waste systems cannot reclaim water or effectively reduce the volume of trash generated by astronauts. The High Efficiency High Output Plastic Melt Waste Compactor (HEHO-PMWC) is currently being developed to recover nearly all water entrained in the trash for further use as well as reducing trash volumes by 91%. The HEHOPMWC works by heating and compressing trash simultaneously to first remove water and then melt plastic in the trash. The melted plastic encapsulates the trash into a 16-inch square tile, approximately one inch thick. In addition to making it easier to store the compressed trash and preventing microbial growth, the polyethylene in the melted plastic gives the tile the ability to act as a radiation shield. Design of a full-scale, fully functional prototype has been completed by Orbital Technologies Corporation. This prototype is designed to occupy one-half of an ISS EXPRESS Rack and is sized to process a 4 kg batch of trash three times per day. Future work with the HEHO-PWMC will include performance testing and longduration testing of the full-scale system. Results of the full-scale system tests will define crew interfaces and required process times, as well as temperatures and compaction forces required to minimize power requirements.

The potential of urban agriculture in combination with organic waste valorization: Assessment of resource flows and emissions for two european cities

The efficient water purification is of high priority because water quality faces ever‐increasing challenges due to the pollution by a vast array of various organic pollutants, causing negative impact due to documented and suspected toxicity toward aquatic organisms and humans as well. In current focus are contaminants of emerging concern (CECs), including cyanotoxins, flame retardants, organohalogens and perfluorinated compounds, personal care products, pesticides, plasticizers, and pharmaceuticals, which are largely unaffected by current (waste)water treatment technologies, thus needing upgrade with a tertiary treatment. A potential solution for such water quality issues is advanced oxidation processes (AOPs), technologies exploiting the high reactivity, and nonselectivity of the hydroxyl radical (HO●) that can be generated by either chemical, radiation, electrical, or mechanical energy. Accordingly, AOPs can be classified into chemical, photo‐assisted, electrical, and mechanical (latter two can be gathered under the term “high energy”) processes that are described from the mechanistic point of view in this article.

This Criticality Safety Evaluation Report (CSER) documents a review of the criticality safety implications of a process test to be performed in tank 241-AZ-101 (101-AZ). The process test will determine the effectiveness of the retrieval system for mobilization of solids and the practicality of the system for future use in the underground storage tanks at Hanford. The scope of the CSER extends only to the testing and operation of the mixer pumps and does not include the transfer of waste from the tank. Justification is provided that a nuclear criticality is extremely unlikely, if not impossible, in this tank.