• Home
  • Search
  • Water security in North Carolina’s most economically insecure county: a case study
  • Cite Icon3
  • https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ada4c2Copy DOI Icon

Water security in North Carolina’s most economically insecure county: a case study

Show More
  • Abstract
  • Literature Map
  • References
  • Citations
  • Similar Papers
Abstract

Abstract Negative health impacts of water insecurity are often felt most in poor and rural communities and communities of color, who are more likely to be underserved by water infrastructure and disproportionately subject to socioeconomic stressors. Despite mandated efforts to allocate significant federal resources to infrastructure funding in ‘disadvantaged communities,’ communities with the most need risk systematic exclusion from access to resources, decision-making structures, and even benefits of research intended to address inequitable infrastructure services and health outcomes in their own communities. This project aims to describe groundwork and preliminary findings from community-engaged environmental research conducted within an ongoing community-based participatory research partnership in Robeson County, NC, a majority–minority county with the lowest median household income of NC’s 100 counties. Semi-structured interviews conducted with community members were analyzed to identify concerns about drinking water security (including safety, affordability, and reliability), perceptions of water quality, averting behaviors taken due to water insecurity, and ideas for improving water security. Findings suggest that there is a high level of mistrust in community water supplies, with perceptions of poor water quality driving a reliance on bottled water. Those relying on private wells expressed greater trust in their water and lower reliance on bottled water. Concerns about affordability were less prominent than those about water quality. Insufficient water reliability (low flow) was mentioned by many respondents, including those with community water service and those relying on private wells. Most supported increasing taxes to improve water security and also recommended increasing communications between water service providers and the public to improve trust. Overall, this work suggests the need for a comprehensive assessment of the quality and reliability of community water services in Robeson County, interventions to address problems identified, and much more engagement with the community about identifying and allocating funding to solve water security problems.

Similar Papers
  • Research Article
  • Citations17

How do people's perceptions of water quality influence the life cycle environmental impacts of drinking water in Uganda?

  • Feb 16, 2016
  • Resources, Conservation and Recycling
  • Christine Prouty +1
  • Research Article

Testing and validation of the questionnaire for evaluating the chemical composition of bottled water in relation to public health

  • Mar 01, 2025
  • Moldovan Journal of Health Sciences
  • Maria Curteanu +5
  • Research Article
  • Citations91

Perception of tap water risks and quality: a structural equation model approach

  • Oct 01, 2005
  • Water Science and Technology
  • M De Franca Doria +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations44

Influence of recreational activity on water quality perceptions and concerns in Utah: A replicated analysis

  • Mar 23, 2018
  • Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
  • Matthew J Barnett +2
  • Book Chapter
  • Citations12

The Role of Water Quality Perceptions in Modelling Lake Recreation Demand

  • May 31, 2011
  • Yongsik Jeon +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations1

“The water is murky, the water is not moving”: qualitative water quality assessment by citizen scientists

  • Sep 03, 2025
  • Frontiers in Water
  • Sara Blanco-Ramírez +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations14

Perceptions, attitudes and behaviours toward urban surface water quality in Accra, Ghana

  • Aug 08, 2016
  • Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal
  • Ernest Mensah Abraham +3
  • Research Article
  • Citations38

Optical water quality and human perceptions: a synthesis

  • Dec 22, 2015
  • WIREs Water
  • Amie O West +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations12

What determines the public’s support for water quality regulations to mitigate agricultural runoff?

  • Sep 24, 2019
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • Tian Guo +3
  • PDF
  • Research Article
  • Citations135

Public perceptions of drinking water: a postal survey of residents with private water supplies.

  • Apr 11, 2006
  • BMC Public Health
  • Andria Q Jones +8
  • Research Article
  • Citations34

Public support for carrot, stick, and no-government water quality policies

  • Jul 05, 2017
  • Environmental Science & Policy
  • Adena R Rissman +2
  • Research Article
  • Citations63

The psychology of drinking water quality: An exploratory study

  • Dec 01, 1993
  • Water Resources Research
  • Geoffrey J Syme +1
  • Research Article
  • Citations67

Microgeographical patterns of schistosomiasis and water contact behavior; examples from Africa and Brazil

  • Jan 01, 1998
  • Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
  • Helmut Kloos +2
  • Research Article

Water injustice in Colombia: Perceptions and realities of water quality examined through advanced machine learning

  • Sep 15, 2025
  • PLOS One
  • Carolina Henao-Rodríguez +2
  • Research Article

Physico- Chemical, Microbiological and Sensory Properties of Some Commercial Bottled Drinking Water In Egypt.

  • Jun 01, 2021
  • Annals of Agricultural Science, Moshtohor
  • Alaa Gomaa
Cactus Communications logo

Copyright 2026 Cactus Communications. All rights reserved.