Web application reconnaissance scan detection using LSTM network based deep learning

Attackers can exploit vulnerabilities in web applications to commit malicious acts such as corrupting application functionality and Trojan horse implantation. For injection vulnerabilities in Web applications, existing methods are limited by the variety of programming languages and the difficulty in extracting semantic information to detect complex vulnerabilities. The paper proposes a pattern matching-based method for identifying injection vulnerabilities in Web applications, which transforms vulnerability identification into path matching in graphical databases by modifying the code property graph to enable it to handle more complex inter-functional relationships in Web applications. In this paper, we designed and implemented a prototype system, VulnFinder. By collecting 100 randomly selected Github high star open-source projects as the dataset for performance testing, we found 262 real vulnerabilities and conducted comparison experiments with static scanning tools RIPS and Cobra, VulnFinder far exceeded the comparison tools in terms of vulnerability determination accuracy, and in terms of the dataset VulnFinder was 94% accurate in determining vulnerabilities in the dataset. In scanning large projects, VulnFinder was approximately 21% more efficient than the comparable methodology tool RIPS.

In most cases, web applications communicate with web services (SOAP and RESTful). The former act as a front-end to the latter, which contain the business logic. A hacker might not have direct access to those web services (e.g., they are not on public networks), but can still provide malicious inputs to the web application, thus potentially compromising related services. Typical examples are XML injection attacks that target SOAP communications. In this paper, we present a novel, search-based approach used to generate test data for a web application in an attempt to deliver malicious XML messages to web services. Our goal is thus to detect XML injection vulnerabilities in web applications. The proposed approach is evaluated on two studies, including an industrial web application with millions of users. Results show that we are able to effectively generate test data (e.g., input values in an HTML form) that detect such vulnerabilities.

Strong security in web applications is critical to the success of your online presence. Security importance has grown massively, especially among web applications. Dealing with web application or website security issues requires deep insight and planning, not only because of the many tools that are available but also because of the industry immaturity. Thus, finding the proper tools requires deep understanding and several steps, including analyzing the development environment, business needs, and the web applications’ complexity. In this paper, we demonstrate the architecture of web applications then list and evaluate the widespread security vulnerabilities. Those vulnerabilities are: Fingerprinting, Insufficient Transport Layer Protection, Information Leakage, Cross-Site Scripting, SQL Injection, and HTTP Splitting. In addition, this paper analyzes the tools that are used to scan for these widespread vulnerabilities in web applications. Finally, it evaluates tools due to security vulnerabilities and gives recommendations to the web applications’ users and administrators aiming to educate them.

Web application development is error prone and results in applications that are vulnerable to attacks by malicious users. The global accessibility of Web applications makes this an extremely serious problem. According to the Open Web Application Security Project (OWASP)’s top ten list that identifies the most serious web application vulnerabilities, the top three vulnerabilities in 2007 [84] were: (1) Cross Site Scripting (XSS) and (2) Injection Flaws (such as SQL Injection). Even after it has been widely reported that web applications suffer from these vulnerabilities, XSS and SQL Injection vulnerabilities remained among the top three vulnerabilities listed in OWASP’s top ten list in 2010 [85] and 2013 [86].

Over the past decade, e-commerce creates exciting new opportunities for business but also brings new web application vulnerabilities and transaction security risks. A stream of news of phishing attacks, website spoofing, payment card skimming (credit /debit cards), fraud in online transactions, malware attack (malicious code attack of viruses, worms, Trojans, and bots), hacker/cracker infiltration, vandalism, identity theft and data breaches of payment card or bank details are increasingly reported. Web application security risk management, therefore, is essential for secure e-commerce online transactions, including order processing, payment transaction, banking and clearing processing. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to propose a web application security risk management methodology to perform e-commerce web application security risk management, helping organizations understand and improve their e-commerce web application security risks. In order to achieve this purpose, the goal of this study has been two-fold: (1) How will organizations measure threat likelihood, impact consequence and severity of their e-commerce web application security risk? (2) What management methodology is required to prompt the e-commerce web application security vulnerabilities measurement and improvement? Using OWASP Top Ten Vulnerabilities as target items, the proposed management methodology is disciplined in a PDCA based ISO/IEC 27005 iterative process activities, integrating Common Criteria attack potential ratings as threat likelihood scales and the FIPS 199 impact categories as impact consequence scales to categorize severity of every e-commerce web application vulnerabilities. Following the proposed management procedure, all the critical e-commerce web application vulnerabilities can be reviewed, analyzed, prioritized and remedied effectively and efficiently, moving on again in a continuous cycle.

Input sanitization and validation of user inputs are well-established protection mechanisms for microservice architectures against XML injection attacks (XMLi). The effectiveness of the protection mechanisms strongly depends on the quality of the sanitization and validation rule sets (e.g., regular expressions) and, therefore, security analysts have to test them thoroughly. In this demo, we introduce JCOMIX, a penetration testing tool that generates XMLi attacks (test cases) exposing XML vulnerabilities in front-end web applications. JCOMIX implements various search algorithms, including random search (traditional fuzzing), genetic algorithms (GAs), and the more recent co-operative, co-evolutionary algorithm designed explicitly for the XMLi testing (COMIX). We also show the results of an empirical study showing the effectiveness of JCOMIX in testing an open-source front-end web application.

Access control vulnerabilities that lead to elevated privileges are among the most dangerous vulnerabilities in Web applications. Most of the existing detection methods use dynamic or static analysis techniques alone, which suffer from high manual involvement, low automation, high leakage rate, low page coverage, and other deficiencies. To this end, this paper proposes a novel access control vulnerability detection method (DetAC) based on a sitemap model with global information representation. This method first constructs a static site-wide sitemap model based on the page link addresses in the Web application source code through static analysis techniques. After that, the application is logged in and executed dynamically with different role users. During this process, execution traces and request parameters are collected and converted into annotations to fill the corresponding edges of the static site-wide sitemap model. Then, the sitemap model with global information representation is obtained. This model can represent both the global control flow and data flow of the application. Then DetAC analyzes the role-based and user-based access control policies of the Web application based on the node reachability and annotated data features of the model. And according to the information such as role, user, and access resources, it generates attack vectors to achieve different roles and the same role of different users to access each other’s resources. Finally, access control vulnerabilities are detected based on the equivalence of the results obtained using attack vector access and normal access to the Web application server. DetAC was validated on five real open-source Web applications, and the results showed that DetAC successfully detected up to 12 access control vulnerabilities, which are more than those of the traditional seven tools. The dynamic analysis page coverage rate was significantly improved during the detection process, reaching an average of 91.37%.

Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks pose a significant cybersecurity threat by exploiting vulnerabilities in web applications to inject malicious scripts, enabling unauthorized access and execution of malicious code. Traditional XSS detection systems often struggle to identify increasingly complex XSS payloads. To address this issue, this research evaluated the efficacy of Machine Learning algorithms in detecting XSS threats within online web applications. The study conducts a comprehensive comparative analysis of XSS attack detection using four prominent Machine Learning algorithms, which consist of Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Random Forest (RF), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM). This research utilizes a comparative methodology to assess the selected Machine Learning algorithms by analyzing their performance metrics, including confusion matrix, 10-fold cross-validation, and assessment of training time to thoroughly evaluate the models. By exploring dataset characteristics and evaluating the performance metrics of each selected algorithm, the study determined the most robust Machine Learning solution for XSS detection. Results indicate that Random Forest is the top performer, achieving 99.93% accuracy and balanced metrics across all criteria evaluated. These findings will significantly enhance web application security by providing reliable defenses against evolving XSS threats.

Current web applications have many inherent vulnerabilities; in fact, in 2008, over 63% of all documented vulnerabilities are for web applications. While many approaches have been proposed to address various web application vulnerability issues, there has not been a study to investigate whether these vulnerabilities share any common properties. In this paper, we use an approach similar to the Goal-Question-Metric approach to empirically investigate four questions regarding open source web applications vulnerabilities: What proportion of security vulnerabilities in web applications can be considered as implementation vulnerabilities? Are these vulnerabilities the result of interactions between web applications and external systems? What is the proportion of vulnerable lines of code within a web application? Are implementation vulnerabilities caused by implicit or explicit data flows? The results from the investigation show that implementation vulnerabilities dominate. They are caused through interactions between web applications and external systems. Furthermore, these vulnerabilities only contain explicit data flows, and are limited to relatively small sections of the source code.

Vulnerabilities in web applications are due to various factors. Failure to properly validated user input is one of the factors that led to run unauthorized code in these programs. Sqli and Xss are two common vulnerabilities in web applications, That is due to lack of proper input validation. Therefore, in this paper we study how to protect organizational websites of north khorasan in iran against Sqli and Xss vulnerabilities. We have analyzed eleven websites. Ten of which related to government organizations and one of them is from private organization. These Web sites have been tested with licenses taken from the relevant organizations.

Nowadays, software products are developed with security vulnerabilities due to bad coding. Vulnerability scanner tools automatically detect security vulnerabilities in web applications; thus, trustworthiness on the results of these tools is essential and, sometimes, the evaluation of their results is done manually or even empirically. This work presents a semi automated approach, based on fault injection techniques, to assess the efficacy of these tools. Three scanner tools were assessed with the presence of realistic software faults responsible for security vulnerabilities in web applications. Results show that the approach is effective and has the advantage of predicting security vulnerabilities through the fault injection techniques.

Dependence on web applications is increasing very rapidly in recent time for social communications, health problem, financial transaction and many other purposes. Unfortunately, the presence of security weaknesses in web applications allows malicious user's to exploit various security vulnerabilities and become the reason of their failure. Currently, SQL Injection (SQLI) attacks exploit most dangerous security vulnerabilities in various popular web applications i.e. eBay, Google, Facebook, Twitter etc. Research on taint based vulnerability detection has been quite intensive in the past decade. However, these techniques are not free from false positive and false negative results. In this paper, we propose an approach to minimize false positive in SQLI vulnerability detection techniques using data mining concepts. We have implemented a prototype tool for PHP, MySQL technologies and evaluated it on six real world applications and NIST Benchmarks. Our evaluation and comparison results show that proposed technique detects SQLI vulnerabilities with low percentage of false positives.

According to OWASP top10 Application Security Risks [8, 9] SQL injection (SQLi) remains the most dangerous and most commonly exploited vulnerability in web applications. Thus, a lot of attentions are devoted by the scientific community for the development of SQLi verification tools. In this paper we focus on the development of an efficient, black box, SQLi vulnerability scanner to achieve an accurate detection. Our new approach is based on the use of structural similarity between rejection pages and their corresponding injection pages. A software prototype has been implemented and showed promising results as compared to well-known web application scanners.

In current information era, every small-scale industry, MNC's, Schools, and Colleges utilise Web Applications to promote their organizations and provide services to society. Web Applications have become a simple and vital medium for communicating with society. This leads to an increase in website utilization. Threats and cyber-attacks are increasing according to the rate of growth of Web Applications. Any organization must ensure the privacy and security of its users' data in order to maintain the company's and users' integrity. Web application vulnerabilities represent major security risks, making it critical to conduct extensive assessments and penetration testing to discover and remediate such flaws. The paper provides a complete overview of web application vulnerability assessment and penetration testing, emphasizing the need of proactive security measures in protecting sensitive data and preserving application integrity. This study aims to identify and categorize web application vulnerabilities (OWASPs) that may compromise the security of the application and result in user data breaches. The primary focus of this project is the security and privacy of user data. Integrating security practices into the software development life cycle through investigating real-world case studies and industry standards. Ultimately, our research adds to the growing body of knowledge in web application security, assisting organizations in creating resilient defenses against cyber threats.

SummaryThis work presents an extended and enhanced gray‐box combinatorial security testing methodology for SQL injection vulnerabilities in web applications. We propose multiple new attack grammars modelling SQLi attacks against MySQL‐compatible databases, each one targeting a different injection context. Additionally, these grammars are also dynamically refined at the beginning of each attack against an endpoint of a web application, as a further optimization of the used attack model by taking into account the specifics of the generated query of that endpoint. Our goal is to enhance existing combinatorial approaches for detecting SQL injection vulnerabilities. The newly developed methodology is implemented in a prototype security testing tool called SQLInjector+, which is an extension of an earlier prototype developed by us in prior work. This improved tool can attack (i.e. test) any web application that uses a MySQL‐compatible database management system. We evaluate our revised approach and improved prototype tool in a case study comprising of different kinds of web applications to which SQLi is a potential security threat. The case study contains the well‐known verification framework WAVSEP among other five real‐world web applications and one web application firewall. Our generated attack vectors, constructed via combinatorial methods applied to our improved and dynamically optimized attack grammars, are capable of injecting every known vulnerable endpoint in WAVSEP and also of finding new vulnerable parameters in some of the real‐world applications investigated in this paper. Our approach performs equally well or better when compared with existing state‐of‐art of SQL injection security testing tools (sqlmap, w3af, wapiti and fuzzdb) across all tested web applications in the case study.