Weights on homogeneous coherent configurations

On association schemes of finite exponent

In the previous work, we introduce a notion of pre-difference sets in a finite group G defined by weaker conditions than the difference sets. In this paper we gave a construction of a pre-difference set in $$G=NA$$ with A an abelian subgroup and N a subgroup satisfying $$N\cap A=\{e\}$$ , from a difference set in $$N\times A$$ . This gives a (16, 6, 2) pre-difference set in $$D_{16}$$ and a (27, 13, 6) pre-difference set in UT(3, 3), where no non-trivial difference sets exist. We also give a product construction of pre-difference sets similar to Kesava Menon construction, which provides infinite series of pre-difference sets that are not difference sets. We show some necessary conditions for the existence of a pre-difference set in a group with index 2 subgroup. For the proofs, we use a rather simple framework “relation partitions,” which is obtained by dropping an axiom from association schemes. Most results are proved in that frame work.

Nilpotent closed subsets of association schemes

Let K be a commutative noetherian ring. It is proved that a representation of a finite group on a K-module of finite length or on a K-module of finite exponent has a finite basis for its identities. In particular, this implies an earlier result of Nguyen Hung Shon and the author stating that every representation of a finite group over a field is finitely based. The problem whether every representation of a finite group over a commutative noetherian ring is finitely based still remains open.

Weights for symmetric and general linear groups

The notion of globally irreducible representations of finite groups was introduced by B.H. Gross, in order to explain new series of Euclidean lattices discovered recently by N. Elkies and T. Shioda using Mordell–Weil lattices of elliptic curves. It has been observed by R. Gow and Gross that irreducible Weil representations of certain finite classical groups lead to globally irreducible representations. In this paper we classify all globally irreducible representations coming from Weil representations of finite classical groups.

On Maximal Closed Subsets in Association Schemes

1.1. Let G be a connected reductive algebraic group defined over a finite (prime) field Fp of p elements. For a given rational G-module M one can consider the restrictions of M to the restricted Lie algebra Lie(G) and to the finite group G(Fp) of Fp-rational points. Even though there is no direct functorial connection between the categories of restricted Lie(G)-modules and G(Fp)-modules, the ambient algebraic group G can serve as a bridge linking these two important module categories. Early results of Curtis in the 1960s provided a one-to-one correspondence between the simple restricted modules (over k = Fp) of Lie(G) and those of G(Fp). This correspondence is given by simply restricting certain classes of simple G-modules. More importantly, these results, along with work of Steinberg, allow one to easily transfer the questions pertaining to the computation of irreducible characters among these three categories. For over thirty years, this approach has been one of the main ideas used to relate the representation and cohomology theory of algebraic groups, Lie algebras, and finite groups of Lie type (in the defining characteristic) (see, e.g., [CPSvan], [Jan2], [Hum3], and [Jan1]). Given the previous results in this area, a natural course of investigation should be to find relationships between canonical modules, like projective modules, for Lie(G) and G(Fp). More precisely,

Construction of association schemes and designs from finite groups

Approximation of integration over finite groups, difference sets and association schemes

In the theory of representations of a finite group by linear transformations the closely related notions of imprimitivity and of play a prominent role. In [18] the author has generalized these notions to the case in which the group is a separable locally compact topological group and the linear transformations are unitary transformations in Hilbert space. It turns out (and this is the principle theorem of [18]) that the classical theorem of Frobenius according to which every imprimitive representation of a finite group is in a certain canonical fashion by a representation of a subgroup may be reformulated so as to remain true under the more general circumstances indicated above. This connection between representations of groups and representations of their subgroups has many interesting and useful properties in the finite case and it naturally occurs to one to study the extent to which these properties persist in general. The present paper is the first of a projected series in which it is planned to investigate this question in a systematic manner. Our principal results, formulated as Theorems 12.1, 12.2 and 13.1, are closely related; each being essentially a corollary of its predecessor. The first asserts that if L is a representation of the closed subgroup G1 of (M and UL is the corresponding induced representation of (M then the restriction of UL to the closed subgroup G2 is a sum over the G1: G2 double cosets of certain induced representations o G 2 . The second gives a similar decomposition of the Kronecker product UL f? UM where L and M are representations of G1 and G2 respectively. The third provides a usable formula for computing the strong intertwining numbers of the induced representations UL and UM of (M. The in question are ordinary discrete sums only when there are at most countably many non trivial double cosets. In general direct integrals as defined by von Neumann in [26] must be used and we must restrict ourselves to the case in which the relevant double coset decomposition of (M is measurable. As we have shown in detail elsewhere [20] these theorems for finite groups imply certain classical results; in particular the Frobenius reciprocity theorem and the Shoda criteria for the irreducibility and unitary equivalence of monomial representations. Our theorems yield generalizations of these results but these generalizations may be regarded as satisfactory only insofar as they deal with representations whose irreducible constituents are discrete and finite dimensional. More far reaching generalizations must be sought in other directions. We

A programme for the calculation of characters and representations of finite groups

Editorial

Perfect models for finite Coxeter groups

Coherent configurations associated with TI-subgroups