- Research Article
- 10.37190/abb/218536
The impact of factors and parameters occurring during selected dynamic tests of aircraft seats on the possibility of safe evacuation and loss of consciousness
- Mar 23, 2026
- Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics
- Małgorzata Śliwa + 2 more +2
Purpose The aim of the study was to analyze whether current aircraft seat testing procedures provide sufficient information to determine if passengers will be able to safely and independently evacuate the aircraft after an emergency landing - with a particular focus on the risk of loss of consciousness resulting from head injuries. Methods The study was based on 17 dynamic laboratory tests of economy-class aircraft seats using anthropomorphic test devices (ATDs - Hybrid II). Two test configurations were analyzed: impact against a bulkhead and impact against the seat in the row ahead (row-to-row, R2R). Head Injury Criterion (HIC) values, head accelerations, and impact zones were measured to assess the risk of brain injury and potential loss of consciousness. Results Bulkhead-type tests more frequently exceeded the acceptable HIC threshold (>1000), indicating a higher risk of severe neurological injury and loss of consciousness. R2R configurations showed lower risk levels. A particularly significant protective factor was greater seat pitch - HIC values dropped considerably for pitch values >35”. The most frequently impacted head region was the frontal area (91.3% of cases). Conclusions Although current testing procedures comply with FAA and EASA regulations, they do not fully reflect real clinical risks. It is recommended to supplement the tests with criteria that include rotational accelerations (e.g., BrIC, HIRC), analyze diverse passenger populations (e.g., children and elderly), and revise regulatory standards to include seat pitch as a critical safety parameter.
Read more