Neurosurgical procedures are some of the most complex procedures in medicine and since the advent of the field, planning, performing, and learning them has challenged the neurosurgeon. Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are making these challenges more manageable. VR refers to a virtual digital environment that can be experienced usually through use of stereoscopic glasses and controllers. AR, on the other hand, fuses the natural environment with virtual images, such as superimposing a preoperative MRI image on to the surgical field [1]. They initially were used primarily as neuronavigational tools but soon their potential in other areas of surgery, such as planning, education, and assessment, was noted and explored. Through this chapter, we outline the history and evolution of these two technologies over the past few decades, describe the current state of the technology and its uses, and postulate future directions for research and implementation.

Tumors of the skull base can be accessed through different routes. Recent advantages in minimally invasive techniques have shown that very different routes can be applied for optimal tumor resection depending on the technical equipment, the surgeon's preference, and the individual anatomy of the pathology. Here, the authors present their technique for pure endoscopic transcranial tumor resection in meningiomas. Out of the cases of the Department of Neurosurgery, Homburg Saar Germany of the last 10 years, all endoscopic procedures for meningiomas were analyzed. Particular attention was given to evaluating the peculiarities of those meningiomas that were treated purely endoscopically. While the endoscope was used in a large number of skull base meningiomas in endonasal approaches or for endoscopic inspection in transcranial skull base surgery, only a small number of meningiomas was selected for a purely endoscopically performed resection. The characteristics of these cases were rather a small lesion, straight access, and a keyhole position of the craniotomy. A complete resection of the tumor was achieved in all cases. Conversion to the microscope was not necessary in any case. There were no technical issues or complications associated with a fully endoscopic resection. The endoscope is a valuable tool for visualization in meningioma surgery. In most cases, it is applied for an endonasal route or for endoscopic inspection in transcranial microsurgical cases. However, small to medium-sized meningiomas that can be accessed through the keyhole approach are good candidates for pure endoscopic resection. Because of the very high magnification and the minimally invasive nature of this approach, it should be considered more frequently in suitable lesions.

Fully endoscopic or endoscope-controlled approaches are essentially keyhole approaches in which rigid endoscopes are the sole visualization tools used during the whole procedure. At the early attempts of endoscope-assisted cranial surgery, it was noted that rigid endoscopes enabled overcoming the problem of suboptimal visualization when small exposures are used. The technical specifications and design of the currently available rigid endoscopes are associated with a group of unique features that define the endoscopic view and lay the basis for its superiority over the microscopic view during brain surgery. Fully endoscopic resection of intraparenchymal brain tumors is a minimally invasive approach that is not routinely practiced by neurosurgeons, with a few major series published so far. Unfamiliarity with the technique, steep learning curve, and concerns about inadequate exposure and decreased visibility may explain this fact. The majority of the purely endoscopic resections for intraparenchymal brain lesions are performed nowadays through tubular retractor systems. In very limited instances, however, the fully endoscopic technique is performed without tubular retractors. In this chapter, we elaborate on the surgical technique and nuances of the fully endoscopic nontubular retractor approach for intraaxial tumors. From a prospective database of endoscopic procedures maintained by the senior author, clinical data, imaging studies, and operative charts and videos of cases undergoing fully endoscopic excision for intraaxial brain tumors were retrieved and analyzed. The pertinent literature was also reviewed. The surgical technique of the fully endoscopic nontubular retractor approach for intraaxial tumors was formulated. The endoscopic technique has many advantages over the conventional procedures. In our hands, the technique has proven to be feasible, efficient, and minimally invasive with excellent results.

Hypothalamic hamartomas (HHs) are rare congenital lesions formed by heterotopic neuronal and glial cells attached to the mammillary bodies, tuber cinereum, and hypothalamus.They often present with an intractable epilepsy typically characterized by gelastic seizures but commonly associated with other types of refractory seizures. The clinical course is progressive in most of the cases, starting with gelastic seizures in infancy and deteriorating into complex seizure disorders that result in catastrophic epilepsy associated with cognitive decline and behavioral disturbances.Hamartomas are known to be intrinsically epileptogenic and the site of origin for the gelastic seizures. As antiepileptic drugs are typically ineffective in controlling HH-related epilepsy, different surgical options have been proposed as a treatment to achieve seizure control. Resection or complete disconnection of the hamartoma from the mammillothalamic tract has proved to achieve a long-lasting control of the epileptic syndrome.Usually, symptoms and their severity are typically related to the size, localization, and type of attachment. Precocious puberty appears mostly in the pedunculated type, while epileptic syndrome and behavioral decline are frequently related to the sessile type. For this reason, different classifications of HHs have been developed based on their size, extension, and type of attachment to the hypothalamus.The bigger and more complex hypothalamic hamartomas typically present with severe refractory epilepsy, behavioral disturbances, and progressive cognitive decline posing a formidable challenge for the control of these symptoms.We present here our experience with the multimodal treatment for complex hypothalamic hamartomas. After an in-depth review of the literature, we systematize our approach for the different types of hypothalamic hamartomas.

Retained medullary cord (RMC) is a defect resulting from impaired secondary neurulation. Intraoperatively, RMC is recognizable as an elongated cord-like structure caudal to the conus, that contains histologically confirmed neuroglial components and a lumen with an ependymal lining. It characteristically does not possess neurological function. This chapter aims to summarize (1) the mechanisms that lead to the occurrence of RMC; (2) the various forms of RMC, such as cystic RMC and 'possible RMC', and (3) the treatment strategies, especially untethering through limited exposure.

While the frequency of direct surgery for basilar tip aneurysms is decreasing, the need for safe and effective surgical treatments for difficult-to-treat aneurysms, including large or wide-necked aneurysms, is likely to continue. In this chapter, our surgical approach for large wide-necked basilar tip aneurysms using the orbitozygomatic approach, the anterior temporal approach, and hybrid surgery are described.

Over the past 30years, the treatment of deep and eloquent arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) has moved away from microneurosurgical resection and towards medical management and the so-called minimally invasive techniques, such as endovascular embolization and radiosurgery. The Spetzler-Martin grading system (and subsequent modifications) has done much to aid in risk stratification for surgical intervention; however, the system does not predict the risk of hemorrhage nor risk from other interventions. In more recent years, the ARUBA trial has suggested that unruptured AVMs should be medically managed. In our experience, although these eloquent regions of the brain should be discussed with patients in assessing the risks and benefits of intervention, we believe each AVM should be assessed based on the characteristics of the patient and the angio-architecture of the AVM, in particular venous hypertension, which may guide us to treat even high-grade AVMs when we believe we can (and need to) to benefit the patient. Advances in imaging and intraoperative adjuncts have helped us in decision making, preoperative planning, and ensuring good outcomes for our patients. Here, we present several cases to illustrate our primary points that treating low-grade AVMs can be more difficult than treating high-grade ones, mismanagement of deep and eloquent AVMs at the behest of dogma can harm patients, and the treatment of any AVM should be tailored to the individual patient and that patient's lesion.

This review is intended to describe and actualize the basic knowledge of the three basic entities that affect the peripheral nerve system and can be treated by surgery: nerve trauma, chronic nerve compressions, and tumors.Regarding trauma, emphasis is given on the timing of surgery, given the fact that the moment in which the surgery is performed and the employed microsurgical reconstruction technique are the most important factors in the final result. Open lesions with associated nerve injury should be managed with an early exploration carried out before 7days. Closed injuries are usually deferred, with few exceptions, from 3 to 6months after the trauma.In turn, chronic compressions require an appropriate clinical, neurophysiological, and imaging diagnosis. Isolated sensory symptoms can be treated actively though without surgery: motor signs like atrophy should be regarded as a sign for immediate surgery, as a deferred treatment might cause an irreversible nerve and muscular damage. Endoscopic approaches are a valuable tool for treatment in selected neuropathies.Finally, nerve tumors demand a thorough preoperative evaluation, as benign tumors are treated in a very different way when compared to malignant lesions. Benign tumors can usually be safely and completely resected without sacrificing the nerve of origin. When malignancy is confirmed, extensive resection to optimize patient survival is the main objective, potentially at the expense of neurological function. This may then be followed by adjuvant radiation and/or chemotherapy, depending on the nature of the tumor and the completeness of resection attained. The role of nerve biopsy remains controversial, and several modern diagnostic techniques might be helpful.

Medically refractory chronic cluster headache (CH) is a severely disabling headache condition for which several surgical procedures have been proposed as a prophylactic treatment. None of them have been evaluated in controlled conditions, only open studies and case series being available. Destructive procedures (radiofrequency lesioning, radiosurgery, section) and microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve or the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) have induced short-term improvement which did not maintain on long term in most of the patients. They carried a high risk of complications, including severe sensory loss and neuropathic pain, and consequently should not be proposed in first intention.Deep brain stimulation (DBS), targeting the presumed CH generator in the retro-hypothalamic region or fibers connecting it, decreased the attack frequency >50 in 60 % of the 52 patients reported. Complications were infrequent: gaze disturbances, autonomic disturbances, and intracranial hemorrhage (2).Occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) was efficient (decrease of attack frequency >50 %) in about 70 % of the 60 patients reported, with a low risk of complications (essentially hardware related). Considering their respective risks, ONS should be proposed first and DBS only in case of ONS failure.New on-demand chronically implanted SPG stimulation seemed to be efficient to abort CH attacks in a pilot controlled trial, but its long-term safety needs to be further studied.

The pathophysiology of PTS including idiopathic intracranial hypertension or 'BIH', remains controversial. The older literature frequently referred to pathology in the cerebral venous drainage but more modern imaging techniques (CT and early MR) failed to reveal gross venous pathology. The role of impaired cranial venous outflow has recently been re-examined in the light of new methods of investigation (advanced MR venography and direct microcatheter venography with manometry) and of treatment (venous sinus stenting). Venous sinus obstruction in PTS is a more common factor in the pathogenesis of the condition than previously recognised. Venous obstruction may be primary, that is, it is the underlying aetiological factor in PTS. Venous sinus obstruction may also be secondary to raised CSF pressure which may exacerbate problems with intracranial compliance and raised CSF pressure. Early experience with venous stenting suggests that it may be a helpful treatment for patients with PTS but more experience and longer follow-up is required to define the subgroups of patients for whom it is most appropriate.