Abbreviations Coronavirus disease 2019 IL Interleukin SARS-CoV-2 severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 SCORAD Severity Score of Atopic Dermatitis Patients suffering from atopic dermatitis (AD) show an increased susceptibility to viral infections [1, 2] . Only a few studies focus on unvaccinated AD patients under dupilumab therapy who had been infected by coronavirus.

Abstract House dust mites are a major source of allergens in house dust and, thus, the main trigger of perennial allergic respiratory diseases [1–5]. Scientific research on the life cycle, diet, and reproductive behavior of dust mites and on the biology of mite allergens has uncovered mechanisms leading to the development of respiratory allergies and suggests measures that can minimize exposure to dust mite allergens. Here, we discuss the evidence linking house dust mite exposure and respiratory allergies and present the efficacy of avoidance measures and their scientific evidence.

SummaryHouse dust mite extracts for allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) require in Germany as other common allergens (pollen from sweet grasses [except maize], birch, alder, hazel; bee and wasp venom) marketing authorisation according to the German Therapy Allergen Ordinance (“Therapieallergene-Verordnung”, [TAV]). Mite allergen extracts that have been approved and also those which are in the approval process are subject to government batch testing. Batch test passing is a prerequisite for marketability. Appropriate quality, efficacy, and safety are prerequisites for the approval of house dust mite extracts. Five HDM allergen extracts from four manufacturers are currently approved in Germany for subcutaneous or sublingual therapy; further extracts are in the approval process. The allergen strength of different products is not comparable; manufacturers use company-specific units to describe the strength. Of the three known major allergens (Group 1 allergens: Der p 1, Der f 1, Group 2 allergens: Der p 2, Der f 2 and Group 23: Der p 23, Der f 23) only Group 1 and Group 2 allergens are usually used to standardize the extracts. Group 23 allergens are localized in the outer membrane of mite faeces, and elution requires special extraction methods. To be efficacious in a single patient an allergen extracts used for AIT must contain all allergen components against which the patient is sensitised. Based on post hoc analyses of large clinical studies, it has been proven for house dust mite tablets that Der p 23 is also contained. In Germany, the Paul Ehrlich Institute is responsible for the approval of therapeutic allergens. For the marketing authorisation information on production procedures, and quality are necessary efficacy and safety (positive benefit risk ratio) of the product must be demonstrated in clinical trials according to the current state of the art.

PurposeDrug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) is a severe delayed drug hypersensitivity reaction with exanthema, eosinophilia, and organ manifestations. After culprit drug withdrawal, systemic corticosteroids (CS) are the most widely used treatment, often requiring high doses for months. Blocking the IL-5/IL‑5 receptor axis with mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab is a promising targeted treatment with a good safety profile and no immunosuppressive effect. The aim of this study is to summarize current experience with the anti-IL5/IL-5-receptor therapy in DRESS.MethodsA retrospective analysis of all patients diagnosed with DRESS and treated with mepolizumab, reslizumab, or benralizumab in DRESS was performed. In addition, a PubMed–Medline search for publications on DRESS with anti-IL-5/IL‑5 receptor treatment was performed.ResultsOf the 14 cases identified, 6 patients were treated with mepolizumab, 6 with benralizumab, 1 patient with reslizumab, and 1 patient was switched from benralizumab to mepolizumab. The main indication for an IL‑5 blockade was a therapy-refractory course (7/14 [50.0%]), recurrent relapses (3/14 [21.4%]), and severe organ dysfunction (2/14 [14.3%]). In 13/14 (93%) cases, a rapid clinical improvement with suppression of eosinophilia and reduction of CS could be achieved. In all but two cases under mepolizumab (dose 100–600 mg) or reslizumab (dose according to body weight), two or more doses were necessary until resolution of DRESS. In 4/7 cases under benralizumab, a single 30 mg dose was sufficient.ConclusionBlockade of the IL-5/IL‑5 receptor axis appears to be a promising treatment in DRESS with fast clinical improvement, which may allow more rapid reduction of CS, and a good safety profile. In addition, a summary of recommendations on when to use blockade of the IL-5/IL‑5 receptor axis in DRESS treatment is provided.

Abstract Sustained elevation of eosinophils above 5 × 109 /l in peripheral blood (PB) should prompt further investigation. Clonal eosinophilia accounts for the much smaller proportion of eosinophilias (< 10%), but exclusion of such a neoplasia is prognostically and therapeutically relevant. Molecular genetic analysis from PB, cytogenetics from bone marrow, and bone marrow histology are primarily used to exclude clonal eosinophilia. Far more common is reactive eosinophilia, the cause of which may be drugs, allergies, solid tumors, lymphomas, worm infections, autoimmune diseases, or idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES). Because of the diverse organ infiltration patterns in eosinophilia, a specific search for possible organ involvement (including heart, lung, gastrointestinal tract, kidney, skin, etc.) should be performed, depending on the patient’s symptoms. The diagnosis of HES is made when organ infiltration with consecutive dysfunction is diagnosed in persistent eosinophilia after exclusion of other causes. Therapeutically, oral corticosteroids (OSC) are used in HES. This can also be helpful in the differential diagnosis, as patients with clonal eosinophilia are usually not expected to achieve remission with OCS. When OCS requirements are high, other immunosuppressants (e.g., methotrexate [MTX], cyclophosphamide) and the interleukin (IL)-5 antagonist mepolizumab are used. In clonal eosinophilia, tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the first-line therapy, depending on the underlying genetic alteration.

Abstract The “epithelial barrier hypothesis” proposes that genetic predisposition to epithelial barrier damage, exposure to various epithelial barrier–damaging agents and chronic periepithelial inflammation are responsible for the development of allergic and autoimmune diseases. Particularly, the introduction of more than 200,000 new chemicals to our daily lives since the 1960s has played a major role in the pandemic increase of these diseases. The epithelial barrier constitutes the first line of physical, chemical, and immunological defence against external factors. A leaky epithelial barrier initiates the translocation of the microbiome from the surface of affected tissues to interepithelial and even deeper subepithelial areas. In tissues with a defective epithelial barrier, colonization of opportunistic pathogens, decreased microbiota biodiversity, local inflammation, and impaired regeneration and remodelling takes place. A dysregulated immune response against commensals and opportunistic pathogens starts. Migration of inflammatory cells to other tissues and their contribution to tissue injury and inflammation in the affected tissues are key events in the development and exacerbation of many chronic inflammatory diseases. Understanding the underlying factors that affect the integrity of epithelial barriers is essential to find preventive measures or effective treatments to restore its function. The aim of this review is to assess the origins of allergic and autoimmune diseases within the framework of the epithelial barrier hypothesis.

Summary Background Peanut allergy is an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated immune response that usually manifests in childhood and can range from mild skin reactions to anaphylaxis. Since quality of life maybe greatly reduced by the diagnosis of peanut allergy, an accurate diagnosis should always be made. Methods A selective literature search was performed in PubMed and consensus diagnostic algorithms are presented. Results Important diagnostic elements include a detailed clinical history, detection of peanut-specific sensitization by skin prick testing and/or in vitro measurement of peanut (extract)-specific IgE and/or molecular components, and double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge as the gold standard. Using these tools, including published cut-off values, diagnostic algorithms were established for the following constellations: 1) Suspicion of primary peanut allergy with a history of immediate systemic reaction, 2) Suspicion of primary peanut allergy with questionable symptoms, 3) Incidental findings on sensitization testing and peanut ingestion so far or 4) Suspicion of pollen-associated peanut allergy with solely oropharyngeal symptoms. Conclusion The most important diagnostic measures in determining the diagnosis of peanut allergy are clinical history and detection of sensitizations, also via component-based diagnostics. However, in case of unclear results, the gold standard—an oral food challenge—should always be used.

Since spring 2020, the wide-ranging contact restriction measures in the context of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic have also led to a reduction in physician–patient contacts in the ambulatory care setting. Telemedicine applications will increasingly provide a way to efficiently deliver patient care under infection control measures. In allergology, telemedical as well as digital applications can also significantly facilitate everyday clinical practice. However, the technical and legal hurdles associated with the implementation of digital strategies must be overcome for this to happen. The aim of this article is to provide an intuitive overview of the aspects to be considered in the implementation of telemedicine consultations and to highlight the current state of the framework as well as optimization possibilities and perspectives in allergology. If a structured use is guaranteed, digital and telemedical applications can improve patient care—also in allergology. There is potential to be exploited in many areas, from the remote collection of clinical history, and video consultations, to the discussion of diagnostic findings, disease monitoring, and therapy support. The use of telemedical applications, especially video consultations, has experienced a remarkable acceleration in the context of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The present overview of the legal, technical and professional framework is intended to support the anchoring of digital and telemedical technologies in everyday allergology. However, in order to consolidate these in the future, an agreement is needed regarding professional standards of action as well as a remuneration structure that is permanently defined beyond the current pandemic.