An accurate interpretation of hemodynamics measured by right heart catheterization (RHC) is crucial for guiding the management of heart failure and pulmonary hypertension. We evaluated the concordance and variability between site-reported and core laboratory-adjudicated interpretations of invasive hemodynamic measurements.

Coronary bifurcation lesions (CBL) are associated with lower procedural success, worse postprocedural outcomes, and greater unplanned repeat revascularization. We sought to better understand the impact of Impella support in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of CBLs. We used data from the cVAD PROTECT III study (NCT04136392), an FDA-audited, single-arm study of patients undergoing high-risk PCI with Impella support, to examine the outcomes of patients undergoing PCI of CBLs. Patients with a Medina classification of 1.1.1, 1.0.1, or 0.1.1 were considered to have a true CBL, and were compared to patients with nontrue CBLs and/or no CBLs. The primary outcome was the rate of CEC-adjudicated major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, and repeat revascularization) at 90 days. Cox proportional hazards regression models were adjusted for age, sex, left main disease, and triple vessel disease. Of 1,044 patients, 523 had at least one true CBL treated. Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for age which was higher in patients with CBLs. Patients with CBLs had a significantly higher pre-PCI SYNTAX scores and number of treated lesions, more left main disease and triple vessel disease, and longer procedure duration. There was no difference in post-PCI SYNTAX score, PCI-related complications, or failure to achieve angiographic success. After adjustment for potential confounders, patients with CBLs had similar rates of 90-day MACCE. While patients with CBLs undergoing Impella-supported high-risk PCI had higher complexity, there were similar rates of PCI-related complications and 90-day MACCE. Trial Name: The Global cVAD Study (cVAD), ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT04136392, URL:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04136392?term=cvad&draw=2&rank=2.

Obicetrapib is a potent, selective cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) inhibitor that significantly lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Additive reductions in LDL-C occur when obicetrapib is combined with ezetimibe. The impact of obicetrapib and ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) on coronary plaque burden is unknown. Favorable changes in noncalcified coronary atherosclerotic plaque volume (NCPV) may indicate a potential beneficial effect on atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events. REMBRANDT is a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial designed to assess the efficacy of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on coronary plaque burden. Individuals aged 45 years or older with ASCVD (imaging evidence of vascular disease or clinically manifested ASCVD) and an LDL-C of ≥70 mg/dL despite maximally tolerated lipid-modifying therapy are eligible to participate. Eligible participants (N = 300) will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to obicetrapib 10 mg and ezetimibe 10 mg FDC once daily or placebo tablet once daily. The primary efficacy outcome of REMBRANDT is percent change in total NCPV from baseline to 18 months as assessed by coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA). Secondary endpoints include absolute change in total NCPV, percent and absolute change in NCPV in the most diseased coronary segment, percent change in LDL-C, and change in perivascular fat attenuation index from baseline to 18 months. The REMBRANDT trial will determine whether the favorable effects of obicetrapib and ezetimibe FDC on LDL-C translate to a reduction in coronary plaque burden as a potential mechanism for ASCVD risk reduction. NCT06305559.

Following the Fontan procedure, patients with single ventricle physiology are at high risk of diastolic dysfunction (DD) and elevated end-diastolic pressure (EDP). This study aims to determine (1) the optimal EDP threshold correlated with adverse outcomes post-Fontan and (2) the clinical and imaging predictors of DD. The study included patients from the Fontan Outcome Registry using CMR Examinations (FORCE) who underwent cardiac catheterization and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within a 2-year window. The composite outcome was defined as all-cause mortality, sustained atrial or ventricular arrhythmia, plastic bronchitis, protein-losing enteropathy, or listing for transplantation. The EDP cutoff was determined using the lowest Brier score from Cox proportional hazard models. The study included 861 patients (mean age 16.4 ± 9.3 years). Mean EDP was 9.0 ± 3.5 mm Hg, with DD defined at an optimal EDP threshold >13 mm Hg. Patients were followed for a median of 3.6 years after catheterization. By univariable analysis patients with DD were more likely to have Fontan associated liver disease (40% vs 29%, P = .03) and kidney disease (19% vs 6%, P < .001). In multivariable analyses, DD was associated with the composite outcome (HR 3.37, 95% CI: 2.03-5.59, P < .001). Ninety-seven patients (11.3%) had DD. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that older age at catheterization, greater body mass index (BMI), nonleft ventricular morphology, and higher ventricular end-diastolic volume (EDV) were associated with DD. DD, defined as an EDP >13 mm Hg, is linked to over 3-fold higher risk of adverse outcomes. Risk factors for DD include older age, higher BMI, nonleft ventricular morphology, and larger EDV. The presence of risk factors may warrant screening catheterization to identify DD and modify care accordingly.