- Research Article
- 10.4103/asl.asl_36_24
A Randomized, Comparative Clinical Study on Effect of Agnikarma (Thermal Microcautery) and Raktamokshana (Bloodletting) in the Symptomatic Management of Lumbar Spondylosis
- Jul 01, 2024
- Ancient Science of Life
- Poona Nath Chouhan + 1 more +1
Background: Kati Sandhigata Vata (lumbar spondylosis) is the most common spinal disorder, which progresses with age. Vitiated Vata gets localized in the lumbar region; later clinically, it presents in the form of lumbar pain, lumbar numbness, lumbar stiffness, and restricted lumbar joint movement). Agnikarma (thermal microcautery) and Raktamokshana (bloodletting) both are noninvasive treatment modalities described in Ayurveda for the management of lumbar spondylosis. To assess the efficacy and to minimize the research gap of validation of traditional modalities, these procedures are being elected for symptomatic management of lumbar spondylosis. A current study is being carried out. Objective: The objective is to evaluate and compare the clinical efficacy of thermal microcautery with Panchadhatu Shalaka (specialized metallic rod made of five metals: copper – 40%, iron – 30%, zinc – 10%, lead – 10%, and tin – 10% and bloodletting with Chinese cups in the management of lumbar spondylosis. Methods: Thirty-two diagnosed patients of lumbar spondylosis were registered and allocated into two groups in 1:1 ratio. In Group A, thermal microcautery was done with specialized metallic rod, while in Group B bloodletting was performed with the help of Chinese cups. Assessment in relief of signs and symptoms was done after completion of therapy and was statistically analyzed. Results: Compared to baseline, both the modalities significantly improved their quality of life as reported after completion of the study on chief complaints and Oswestry Disability Index; however, on comparing effect of therapy on chief complaints, lumbar pain ( P = 0.05), lumbar stiffness ( P = 0.12), lumbar numbness ( P = 0.08), and restricted lumbar joint movement ( P = 0.30), there is a nonsignificant difference noted among them. Conclusion: At the end of the trial, it is observed that both therapies do not have any significant difference statistically; however, clinically thermal microcautery provided better results than bloodletting.
Read more