Sheldon Magder’s article on applying Arthur Guyton’s principles to clinical fluid management provides valuable insights into optimizing hemodynamics in critically ill patients. While emphasizing the role of right atrial pressure (RAP) in assessing cardiac output, challenges arise due to RAP’s variable accuracy and the oversimplification of cardiovascular dynamics. Integrating RAP with dynamic assessments and bedside ultrasound can enhance fluid management strategies. Future research should aim to improve RAP’s predictive accuracy and validate its clinical utility for individualized patient care.

Procalcitonin (PCT) is frequently used by clinicians in children with suspected bacterial infections and sepsis. However interpretation in the critically ill child may be challenging due to the complexity of underlying conditions and its impact on PCT values. Herein, we propose a guidance for the use of procalcitonin in critically ill children, supported by a comprehensive analysis of the literature, to help the clinician for interpreting PCT in the various clinical conditions encountered in pediatric intensive care units. We describe the importance of the clinical context, timing of measurement and evidence on PCT values in diagnosing sepsis and to guide antibiotic therapy in critically ill children.Graphical abstract

Ventilatory management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requires a careful balance between achieving adequate gas exchange and minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). Recent advances in bedside monitoring of respiratory mechanics have created new opportunities to individualize mechanical ventilation by aligning ventilator settings with the patient’s dynamic pathophysiology. This review synthesizes current evidence on key respiratory mechanics parameters - such as driving pressure, respiratory system compliance, airway resistance, mechanical power - and examines how they can guide titration of tidal volume, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), and respiratory rate. By integrating real-time assessments of respiratory mechanics, clinicians can reduce stress and strain, limit alveolar overdistension and collapse, and optimize oxygenation and ventilation. Moreover, practical strategies are discussed for implementing physiology-guided ventilation in the intensive care unit, with attention to patient-specific characteristics and the heterogeneity of ARDS subphenotypes. Respiratory mechanics-guided ventilation represents a pragmatic, individualized strategy that enhances lung protection, complements established protocols and may contribute to improve survival. Further experimental and clinical studies are required to validate these approaches and translate them into precision medicine for ARDS.

Forty-two questions were evaluated concerning management of emergencies and critical illnesses in paediatric and adult patients with sickle cell disease. The assessment covered the following areas: patient referral, vaso-occlusive crisis, acute chest syndrome, transfusion therapy, and priapism. The patient referral category included guidelines for admission to intensive care unit and management at specialized reference centers. The vaso-occlusive crisis topic encompassed pain management, hydration, incentive spirometry, and target oxygen saturation levels. For acute chest syndrome, the focus areas included imaging techniques such as lung ultrasound, computed tomography scans, and echocardiography; treatment with systemic corticosteroids; non-invasive ventilation; prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation; and procalcitonin and antibiotic therapy. The section on transfusion therapy addressed indications and methods of transfusion, as well as the diagnosis and prediction of delayed hemolytic transfusion reactions. A total of 45 recommendations were proposed, including 14 specific to adults, 13 specific to pediatrics, and 18 applicable to both adults and children, along with three therapeutic algorithms. The Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was adhered to throughout the process. Sixteen recommendations were based on a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+ or 2−), while 26 were based on evidence that could not be classified under the GRADE system and were therefore considered expert opinions. Finally, for three aspects of sickle cell disease management, the experts concluded that no reliable recommendations could be made based on the current state of knowledge. The recommendations and therapeutic algorithms received strong agreement from the experts.

ObjectiveTo investigate the relationship between central venous pressure (CVP) and acute right ventricular (RV) dysfunction in critically ill patients on mechanical ventilation.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled mechanically ventilated critically ill who underwent transthoracic echocardiographic examination and CVP monitoring. Echocardiographic indices including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), fractional area change (FAC), and tricuspid lateral annular systolic velocity wave (S’) were collected to assess RV function. Patients were then classified into three groups based on their RV function and presence of systemic venous congestion as assessed by inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) and hepatic vein (HV) Doppler: normal RV function (TAPSE ≥ 17 mm, FAC ≥ 35% and S’ ≥9.5 cm/sec), isolated RV dysfunction (TAPSE < 17 mm or FAC < 35% or S’ <9.5 cm/sec with IVCD ≤ 20 mm or HV S ≥ D), and RV dysfunction with congestion (TAPSE < 17 mm or FAC < 35% or S’ <9.5 cm/sec with IVCD > 20 mm and HV S < D).ResultsA total of 518 patients were enrolled in the study, of whom 301 were categorized in normal RV function group, 164 in isolated RV dysfunction group and 53 in RV dysfunction with congestion group. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed a good discriminative ability of CVP for identifying patients with RV dysfunction and congestion(AUC 0.839; 95% CI: 0.795–0.883; p < 0.001). The optimal CVP cutoff was 10 mm Hg, with sensitivity of 79.2%, specificity of 69.4%, negative predictive value of 96.7%, and positive predictive value of 22.8%. A large gray zone existed between 9 mm Hg and 12 mm Hg, encompassing 95 patients (18.3%). For identifying all patients with RV dysfunction, CVP demonstrated a lower discriminative ability (AUC 0.616; 95% CI: 0.567–0.665; p < 0.001). Additionally, the gray zone was even larger, ranging from 5 mm Hg to 12 mm Hg, and included 349 patients (67.4%).ConclusionsCVP may be a helpful indicator of acute RV dysfunction patients with systemic venous congestion in mechanically ventilated critically ill, but its accuracy is limited. A CVP less than10 mm Hg can almost rule out RV dysfunction with congestion. In contrast, CVP should not be used to identify general RV dysfunction.

BackgroundVarious Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) titration strategies have been proposed to optimize ventilation in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We aimed to compare PEEP titration strategies based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT) to methods derived from respiratory system mechanics with or without esophageal pressure measurements, in terms of PEEP levels and association with recruitability.MethodsNineteen patients with ARDS were enrolled. Recruitability was assessed by the estimated Recruitment-to-Inflation ratio (R/Iest) between PEEP 15 and 5 cmH2O. Then, a decremental PEEP trial from PEEP 20 to 5 cmH2O was performed. PEEP levels determined by the following strategies were studied: (1) plateau pressure 28–30 cmH2O (Express), (2) minimal positive expiratory transpulmonary pressure (Positive PLe), (3) center of ventilation closest to 0.5 (CoV) and (4) intersection of the EIT-based overdistension and lung collapse curves (Crossing Point). In addition, the PEEP levels determined by the Crossing Point strategy were assessed using different PEEP ranges during the decremental PEEP trial.ResultsExpress and CoV strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Positive PLe and Crossing Point ones (17 [14–17], 20 [17–20], 8 [5–11], 10 [8–11] respectively, p < 0.001). For each strategy, there was no significant association between the optimal PEEP level and R/Iest (Crossing Point: r2 = 0.073, p = 0.263; CoV: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.941; Express: r2 < 0.001, p = 0.920; Positive PLe: r2 = 0.037, p = 0.461). The PEEP level obtained with the Crossing Point strategy was impacted by the PEEP range used during the decremental PEEP trial.ConclusionsCoV and Express strategies led to higher PEEP levels than the Crossing Point and Positive PLe strategies. Optimal PEEP levels proposed by these four methods were not associated with recruitability. Recruitability should be specifically assessed in ARDS patients to optimize PEEP titration.