Anemia, a common comorbidity in older patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF), is associated with an increased risk of adverse events. This study evaluated the prognostic effects of longitudinal changes in anemia status on clinical outcomes in patients with AF. We prospectively evaluated data of 1,388 patients with AF from the Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry (1,010 men; mean [±SD] age 72.3±9.7 years) and recorded the incidence of death, HF, thromboembolism, and major bleeding. Of these patients, the 1,233 for whom hemoglobin levels were available at baseline and at the 1-year follow-up were further evaluated. Patients were categorized into 3 groups based on longitudinal changes in 1-year anemia status: Group 1, AF without anemia; Group 2, AF with improved anemia; and Group 3, AF with sustained or new-onset anemia. Over the 1-5 years of follow up, the incidences of death, HF, thromboembolism, and major bleeding were significantly higher among patients with than without anemia. In addition, the incidence of death or HF was significantly higher in Group 3 than in Groups 1 and 2. Multivariate analysis revealed no anemia or improvement in anemia in 1 year as an independent predictor for a favorable prognosis for cardiovascular death and HF. Recovery from anemia may be associated with a favorable clinical course of AF.

Anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) has undergone major changes following the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in 2011. However, the transition of anticoagulation therapy for AF patients with severe renal dysfunction remains to be elucidated. Follow-up data, including creatinine clearance (CrCl), were available for 3,706 patients in the Fushimi AF Registry. We divided patients into 3 groups based on CrCl as follows: (1) CrCl ≥50 mL/min; (2) 50 mL/min>CrCl≥30 mL/min; and (3) CrCl <30 mL/min. In patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 50>CrCl≥30 mL/min, prescription of oral anticoagulants increased year-by-year from 2011 to 2021 with a growing proportion of DOAC; however, the prescription of oral anticoagulants remained almost unchanged in those with CrCl <30 mL/min. In patients with CrCl ≥50 mL/min and 50 mL/min>CrCl≥30 mL/min, the incidence of adverse events, including stroke/systemic embolism and major bleeding, was lower among patients enrolled after 2014 than before 2013. However, these trends were not seen in patients with CrCl <30 mL/min. Despite the increased use of DOAC in patients with AF since 2011, anticoagulation therapy for AF patients with severe renal dysfunction has largely remained unchanged, and a reduction in adverse events in those patients has not been observed.

Anticoagulant therapy is a drug therapy that inhibits the formation of blood clots. Although anticoagulants are effective in preventing thromboembolism, they also carry the risk of bleeding, so they must be managed carefully, taking both efficacy and safety into account. Evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of each anticoagulant has already accumulated through many large clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance. However, when making decisions in clinical practice, it is necessary to always take into consideration differences in patient populations between clinical trials and actual clinical practice, as well as differences in historical background. (For example, there are differences in antiplatelet drugs and coronary artery interventions that were mainly used in each era.) In this review we discuss the effectiveness and safety of currently used anticoagulants, focusing on different patient backgrounds and points to keep in mind regarding their proper use, based on the latest reports in Asian populations, especially Japanese people, over the past 1-2 years.

Guideline-directed medical therapy has become an important component of heart failure (HF) therapy, with sacubitril/valsartan as one of the recommended drugs; however, the real-world prognostic implications of sacubitril/valsartan uptitration are unclear. Patients with HF newly initiated on sacubitril/valsartan were registered in a retrospective multicenter study (REVIEW-HF). In all, 995 patients were divided into 3 groups according to the maximum dose achieved: high dose, sacubitril/valsartan 400 mg; intermediate dose, sacubitril/valsartan 200-<400 mg; and low dose, sacubitril/valsartan <200 mg. A total of 397 (39.9%) patients received high-dose sacubitril/valsartan; they had a significantly lower risk of mortality or HF hospitalization than patients in the low-dose (hazard ratio [HR] 0.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.29-0.53; P<0.001) and intermediate-dose (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.45-0.94; P=0.03) groups. In the multivariable Cox regression model, higher systolic blood pressure and maintained geriatric nutritional risk index were significantly associated with a higher incidence of achieving a high dose of sacubitril/valsartan. Patients who did not receive high-dose sacubitril/valsartan experienced more hypotension during the follow-up period, whereas hyperkalemia, severe renal events, and angioedema did not differ across the achieved dose classifications. Patients who achieved sacubitril/valsartan uptitration had a better prognosis than those who did not. Before sacubitril/valsartan uptitration, patients need to monitor blood pressure closely to prevent worsening events.

Fabry disease is a hereditary metabolic disorder caused by a decrease in or deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme α-galactosidase A. Enzyme replacement therapy or pharmacological chaperone therapy can improve prognosis, especially in patients in the early phase of cardiac involvement. Longitudinal strain (LS) evaluated using speckle tracking echocardiography can detect early contractile dysfunction. However, there have been no reports of LS in Japanese Fabry disease patients. We recruited 56 patients with Fabry disease (22 men, 34 women) who were followed up at Jikei University Hospital. Fifty-eight control subjects without overt cardiac diseases were also included in the study. We evaluated LS in each patient, and the values of each of the 17 segments of the left ventricle (LV) were averaged, and global LS (GLS) was also calculated. GLS was significantly worse in Fabry disease patients without LV hypertrophy than in control subjects (-18.5±2.8% vs. -20.4±1.6%; P<0.05). In addition, Fabry disease patients without LV hypertrophy had significantly worse lateral LS (-16.4±5.0% vs. -19.3±1.8%; P<0.05), basal LS (-16.5±3.2% vs. -18.5±1.7%; P<0.05), and mid LS (-18.7±1.7% vs. -20.8±1.6%; P<0.05) than control subjects. These results suggest that early contractile dysfunction in Fabry disease can be observed using GLS, lateral LS, basal LS, and mid LS, even without LV hypertrophy.

We determined the left ventricular mass index (LVMI) cut-off value for the risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic regurgitation (AR) and investigated the effect of preoperative left ventricular remodeling on long-term outcomes postoperatively. Of the 1,580 patients who underwent surgical AVR at Shiga University of Medical Science between January 2002 and December 2022, we retrospectively analyzed data for 263 patients who underwent surgery for AR. The receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the cut-off value of preoperative LVMI for the incidence of MACCE was 200 g/m2(area under the curve=0.692). We compared postoperative outcomes between patients with preoperative LVMI >200 g/m2(n=92) and those with preoperative LVMI ≤200 g/m2(n=171) after adjusting for preoperative characteristics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. The mean (±SD) follow-up period was 6.9±5.1 years. The rate of MACCE at 10 years was significantly higher in patients with preoperative LVMI >200 g/m2than in those with preoperative LVMI ≤200 g/m2(25.6% vs. 13.5%; P=0.020). In multivariable Cox models, preoperative LVMI >200 g/m2was significantly associated with a higher risk of MACCE (hazard ratio 2.356, P=0.006). Preoperative LVMI >200 g/m2was associated with a higher rate of MACCE in patients undergoing AVR for AR.

Aggressive lipid-lowering therapy is important for secondary prevention of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The recommended target for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) of <70 mg/dL is often not achieved. To address this gap, we implemented a clinical pathway in all hospitals that perform percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) with primary care physicians in Nagasaki and aimed to validate the effectiveness of this pathway in an acute setting. This retrospective cohort study included medical records extracted from 8 hospitals in Nagasaki, Japan, where PCI was performed for patients with AMI. The index date was defined as the date of hospitalization for AMI between July 1, 2021, and February 28, 2023. The primary outcome was the rate of achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL at discharge. The median baseline LDL-C level at admission was 121 mg/dL (n=226) in the pre-implementation group and 116 mg/dL (n=163) in the post-implementation group. In the post-implementation group, 131 patients were treated using the clinical pathway. The rate of achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL at discharge increased significantly from 37.2% before implementation to 54.6% after implementation. Logistic regression analysis revealed a positive correlation between the implementation of the clinical pathway and achieving LDL-C <70 mg/dL. Implementation of a region-wide clinical pathway for LDL-C management significantly improved the rate of intensive lipid-lowering therapy and the achievement of LDL-C targets.