- Research Article
- 10.1353/tcj.2023.a914592
Simonides Lyricus: Essays on the 'Other' Classical Choral Lyric Poet ed. by Peter Agócs and Lucia Prauscello (review)
- Dec 01, 2023
- Classical Journal
- Ruth Scodel
Reviewed by: Simonides Lyricus: Essays on the 'Other' Classical Choral Lyric Poet ed. by Peter Agócs and Lucia Prauscello Ruth Scodel Simonides Lyricus: Essays on the 'Other' Classical Choral Lyric Poet. Edited by Peter Agócs and Lucia Prauscello. Cambridge Classical Journal Supplements Book 42. Cambridge, UK: The Cambridge Philological Society, 2020. Pp. xi + 285. Hardback, $60.00. ISBN: 9781913701062. This conference volume, although all the papers are excellent, is a bit odd. are conference, as the introduction helpfully explains, was conceived in 2011 as a response to the publication of Poltera's edition and commentary for the lyric fragments and David Sider's edition of the elegies and epigrams, then planned, now published. The melic poetry has received more aBention recently, especially thanks to Richard Rawles' 2018 Simonides the Poet: Intertextuality and Reception (Cambridge), and this book is only in part about the melic poetry. The volume helpfully displays various approaches, but the papers do not engage with each other. The first section addresses transmission and authorship. An essay by Ucciardello provides, first, a survey of all possible Simonidean fragments among the adespota. This very useful information would have been best provided as some kind of wiki, generally available and easily edited to include new publications. The second part is a case study of P. Strass. inv. 1406–9. It demonstrates that the fragment is not lyric poetry at all, but from an anonymous prose work of perhaps the late 2nd century CE called #e Life and Maxims of Secundus the Silent Philosopher. D'Alessiothen oDers a Cne discussion of the hypochoreme and fr. *107 M=Simonides 255 Polterra—but D'Alessio thinks that the likeliest author is Pratinus. So we begin with not-Simonides and probably-not-Simonides. In the second section, "Genres and Contexts of Performance, Patronage, and Reception," Poltera argues for dating Simonides later, because there is no real evidence for his activity before 500. The chapter shows very clearly how up-to-date Simonides' style is for the early 5th century. Then Sider proposes that the boundaries dividing melic from elegy and elegy from epigram were not as rigid as we oLen think—because elegies could include epigrams (imagined inscriptions), bits of elegies could be transmiBed as epigrams, and lyric could include invective. Carey considers the thrēnoi, a genre for which Simonides was celebrated, especially for their pathos, although very little [End Page 243] remains. Carey contrasts Simonidean lament with Pindar's (there is no sign of Pindaric consolatory eschatology), and uses funeral orations as a way to see some of the available ways to make the death of individuals meaningful in wider contexts. Rutherford looks at PMG 537= 301 Polterra, which aBributes to Simonides' kateuchai (a mysterious and debated category) a narrative about how the Achaeans recruited the daughters of Anius from Delos to provide food at Troy. Rutherford analyzes evidence for Athenian interest in Delos and Anius (and considers it plausible that the poem was commissioned by Pisistratus, so he has evidently not been convinced by Poltera). Finally, recent discussions of the Persian War poetry have considered how Simonides balances praise of one polis with that of the entire alliance. Morgan deLly addresses the related problem of balancing praise of leaders with that of the army as a whole and shows how carefully Simonides seems to have balanced individual and collective. The final section concerns the early reception of Simonides. Ford asks why Simonides rather than other possible candidates among the poets had such a reputation for wisdom. He makes the interesting suggestion that sophists especially admired his care with language and his versatility over genres. I wonder, also, whether the diplomatic skill discussed by Morgan may have been a factor, along with the apparently low salience of erotic themes in his poetry. He may even have been useful as a foil by someone like Protagoras because the fathers of his young students (who must have paid the fees) would have admired him, so that it was useful to assimilate this new education to the old, while the young men could believe that sophistic education was an obvious improvement. Hunter's paper on the Scopas...
Read more