Professional certification for practitioners of C.D.
Abstract This article explores the pro's of professionally certifying those engaged in professional community development and of accrediting institutions that provide training for them. Its author points out that if we can define what is unique about C.D. practice, and if we feel these unique elements of practice are important enough to be helped to survive, then certification and accreditation of those who profess them are necessary. Such action would protect those elements from arrogation and garbling by professionals in older sister fields who are re‐packaging their traditional wisdom as “Community Development” to hype its salability, enhance its power to attract university students, and to justify new courses, degree programs, grant funds, jobs, etc. But because Community Development, far more than these sister professions, is catalytic‐involving clients so completely in the amelioration of their own problems‐its certification procedures must be correspondingly liberal. Full professional credentialing should be allowed on the basis of proven performance, alone, as well as on appropriate institutional training, alone, or any combination of the two.
Read more