The Preamble to the Constitution of India declares the constitution to be a people’s document and it also sets basic objectives sought through the constitution. Even the apex court of India has stated that preamble is a key to open the minds of the framers of the constitution1. In such a scenario, the preamble to the Constitution of India holds an important place as the guide to the legislators. But the preamble to the Indian Constitution has no mention of ‘Environment’ which needs to be interpreted in the light of other philosophical aspects including Justice (social, economic and political), Liberty (of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship), Equality (of Status and opportunity); and Fraternity (assuring the dignity of individual and the unity and integrity of nation). The environment is one of the basic elements which contributes to the growth of human being2 and in such conditions the requirement of a clean and unpolluted environment is necessary for an individual’s growth, therefore, the equal access to clean environment becomes a right on part of individuals and a duty\ on state to provide every individual with a clean environment. This paper will attempt to elaborate the different perspectives of the Environment under the head Justice; and a further investigation regarding the religious aspects of environment and their contribution to the environmental pollution will also be done.

For the past few decades, the juvenile justice system in India has shifted from a rehabilitative to a retributive paradigm, leading researchers to become increasingly interested in the gendered implications of paradigm change that may exacerbate problems of young offenders, especially females. The current article explores the question of how social attitudes, institutional prejudices, and intersectional identities affect the ways in which female offenders are perceived and treated in India. The framework for the current study includes theoretical concepts of rehabilitation, retribution, and feminist theory. The use of secondary analysis and the description of policy changes and historical context studies are included in the research. Employing a data-driven analysis based on a combination of case studies, quantitative data, and inter-state comparison, the research reveals that female offenders face systemicinstitutional and individual problems, including re-victimization, trauma, and inadequate access to quality rehabilitation services. This article argues for genderresponsive and intersectional juvenile justice policies and redirects attention to rehabilitation available results for future policy and research initiatives

The terrorism insurance market is a constantly growing industry as a result of the rise in terrorism and associated violence around the world. This trend has captured the attention of the Indian insurance sector as well. More and more people, companies, and organizations are getting insurance to protect themselves in case a terrorist attack occurs in the future. However, what exactly is terrorism insurance? Is it given under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Amendment Act, 2008 or any other related and applicable national or state legislation formulated? Terrorism insurance offers coverage for damages resulting from the aforementioned terrorist acts or guarantees to hold the insurer harmless in the event of such losses. The Indian Market Terrorism Risk Insurance Pool, which is managed by the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, is now used by general insurers to offer property insurance. As foreign re-insurers withdrew their terrorist coverage following the 9/11 attacks in the United States of America, general insurers took the initiative to create the pool in April 2002. The cost of terrorism insurance, according to insurers, has decreased recently because there haven’t been any significant losses in the pool. The pool’s capacity has increased to 4,500 crore. But, the recent terrorist attacks in Paris and London as well as the ongoing enemy infiltration over our borders have stoked panic, leading to a rise in terrorism insurance in India. Despite the pool taking advantage of this fear, there is no legal framework in place to control it. While the United States and other nations have laws covering similar matters, this research study examines whether India also needs such legislation

With the internet’s growing influence, numerous pirated copies of copyrighted works exist on different platforms. It is not possible to always approach the Courts because the person infringing the copyright might be a citizen in a country other than where the copyright owner resides. As a result, the person who infringed the copyright is out of the court’s reach. Here comes in handy the ADR mechanism established in almost every nation. This paper primarily deals with the suitability of the ADR mechanism being more than usual litigation for violation of copyright and licensing agreements.The article first deals with the potential copyright disputes that might arise due to the overarching boundaries of the internet. Thereafter, the paper centers its focus on the problems that the parties to an infringement suit might face if courts are approached for copyright infringement such as lack of jurisdiction, expensive, time-consuming, and so on. As the article proceeds further, it delves into how the ADR mechanism has improved the resolution of copyright disputes. The ADR mechanism does not need to abide by all the domestic laws of one country. In cases where parties belong to different jurisdictions, the parties are free to choose any seat of arbitration and the applicable arbitration rules. It is ultimately the law of the seat of arbitration that governs the arbitration process. Moreover, the approach of the ADR mechanism is always to arrive at a win-win solution i.e., a solution where neither of the parties is at disadvantage. The ADR mechanism works solely with the intention to resolve disputes by arriving at a settlement where both parties are satisfied and neither of them becomes the loser. The article also deals with the difference in approach of arbitration, mediation, conciliation, and other ADR methods while resolving a dispute.

One nation one election is a system of election wherein the elections for all the 3 tiers of government i.e., Lok Sabha, State Assemblies and local bodies are held together on a same day. This idea is not novel as it was followed during 1952 – 1967. This paper starts with a detailed study of this concept and its history. It examines the scope of conducting simultaneous election at present and its feasibility. It analyses the pros and cons and the matters that are to be looked upon before implementing this system like constitutional amendments, preparations to be made by the Election Commission, etc. In nutshell, this paper tries to find out the possibilities of implementing this system of ‘one nation one election’ at present and all the allied measures that are to be taken to implement the same.