To evaluate the systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of any type of school-based oral health programs in children and adolescents. A two-staged search strategy comprising electronic databases and registries based on systematic reviews was employed to evaluate the effectiveness of school-based interventions. The quality assessment of the systematic reviews was carried out using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2) tool. The Corrected Covered Area was used to evaluate the degree of overlap. Nine reviews were included in this umbrella review. The Critical Covered Area reported moderate overlap (5.70%) among the primary studies. The assessment of risk of bias revealed one study with a high level confidence; one with moderate whereas all other studies with critically low confidence. Inconclusive evidence related to improvements in dental caries and gingival status was reported whereas, plaque status improved in a major proportion of the reviews. Knowledge, attitude, and behavior significantly increased in students receiving educational interventions when compared to those receiving usual care. The evidence points to the positive impact of these interventions in behavioral changes and clinical outcomes only on a short term basis. There is a need for long-term follow-up studies to substantiate the outcomes of these interventions.

Discolouration of primary teeth, often attributed to trauma and pulpal infection, is a prevalent concern that can significantly impact the esthetics and self-esteem of children. To address this issue, bleaching techniques have emerged as a viable treatment option. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the effectiveness of bleaching agents in managing discoloured primary teeth. Two reviewers independently conducted an electronic database search using PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, CINAHL via EBSCO, Scopus, and Web of Science until September 26,2023. In vitro studies and case reports that assessed the quantifiable success were included. The present review utilized Distiller SR software for data extraction. The protocol of this study was registered in PROSPERO (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) (CRD42022329831).The quality of studies was analysed with Cochrane tool and the JBI checklist. The search retrieved 1845 references of which 14 studies were included for qualitative analysis. There were 8 in vitro studies and 6 case reports included in this systematic review. There were 299 teeth samples in the in vitro studies and 18 teeth were assessed in the case reports. All the 18 teeth (6 case reports) showed considerable shade improvement within 7-14 days. However, only 3 teeth were followed up for a period of 12-24 months. Substantial shade improvement was also observed in samples in the in vitro studies. This systematic review has comprehensively examined the various bleaching agents and methods for the management of discoloured primary teeth. However, it is crucial to recognize that the available evidence is from case reports and is insufficient to make a clinical recommendation.

AimTo evaluate the efficacy of Odontopaste in reducing the microbial load in endodontics compared to other intracanal medicaments.Materials and methodsThe literature was electronically searched on PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Ovid Medline and Web of Science. In-vitro, ex-vivo and in-vivo studies that evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of Odontopaste were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies.ResultsA total of four in-vitro studies were included in the systematic review. One study showed that Odontopaste had significantly more microbial cell growth on roots in all dentine depths compared to other medicaments or test agents. Another study found that Odontopaste significantly decreased colony-forming units compared to propolis and chlorhexidine. Further results showed that Odontopaste did not significantly decrease microbial numbers when used in isolation. Additionally, combining Odontopaste and calcium hydroxide did not enhance the effectiveness of calcium hydroxide. The studies had a medium to high risk of bias.ConclusionThere is insufficient high-quality evidence to assess the antimicrobial efficacy of Odontopaste compared to other intracanal medicaments. Further research is required to determine Odontopaste’s efficacy as an antimicrobial medicament in endodontics.

Several prevalence studies have estimated the region-specific impact of oral diseases on oral health-related quality of life. However, none of them reported and compared the same from a global perspective. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate pooled epidemiologic data about child-oral impacts on daily performance (C-OIDP) globally. A search was conducted in PubMed, Science Direct, SciELO, Semantic scholar, and Cochrane databases upto January 2023. Studies evaluating OIDP among 11-18-year-olds were included in the review. Quality of the included studies was evaluated using the health states quality index for cross-sectional studies. The meta-analysis used R package software version 4.3.0. A common effect model was used to calculate the pooled prevalence. The protocol was registered in the PROSPERO (CRD-NIHR) database with Reference ID CRD42023393798. The systematic literature search yielded 257 unique citations. After screening titles and abstracts, 214 irrelevant citations were excluded, leaving 55 for full-text review. Overall, 43 studies from 23 countries were included. The meta-analysis reported a pooled prevalence impact C-OIDP of 53.36% (CI: 52.78-53.95, 43 studies, 16,622 participants). The prevalence of C-OIDP scores among South America, Asia, Europe, Africa and Oceania was 83%, 63%, 58%, 33% and 47%, respectively. The maximum prevalence was reported in South America while the least prevalence was noted in the African population. Oral diseases affect the oral health-related quality of life of more than half of children and adolescents globally. Huge variations were noted in the prevalence of oral impacts across different regions. These findings can be utilized by policymakers to draft measures required for reducing impacts of oral diseases and improving the health-related quality of life.

This study is an observational prospective longitudinal cohort study, following 102 children aged 1 to 12 months over a period of 24 months. At baseline, a dental examination was carried out to assess the number of carious lesions present using the ICDAS system, and a saliva sample was taken to assess the levels of Streptococcus mutans (SM) in saliva using the Dentocult SM saliva strip. Cohort caregivers received toothbrushing instruction and a 25% xylitol toothpaste tube for which they were instructed to use twice a day over a 3-month period, after which they returned to clinic at Pristina University to receive another tube. This process continued throughout the entire 24-month study period. At the end of the study, SM prevalence was recorded again. 102 children and their mothers were included in this study: 43 girls and 59 boys. At the beginning of the study, the child's mean age was 6.7 months, and at the end, 30.8 months. A random sample of 60 mothers was selected to analyse SM levels. The data set was summarised descriptively using summary statistics, percentages and statistical tests. Values were expressed as a mean and standard deviation. SMprevalence comparison between baseline and endpoint was tested using chi-square statistics. At the baseline dental examination, the child's mean age was 6.7 (±3.7 months). At this point59% of the 102 infants were edentulous. Caries was reported to be present in12.4% of children. The mean ICDAS score was calculated as 0.70(2.42 SD). When caries was present (87.6% of the 102 children included in the study), the majority of the caries experience (74.2%) was determined as at an early stage (ICAS score 1 or 2). 72.6% (n = 74/102) of children wereinfected with SM at baseline. 28 children had Level 1 (0) SM. 57 children had Level 2 and 3 (102-4) SM. 17 children had Level 4 SM (≥105) SM. The SM categorical distribution was statistically significant (p = 0.02). At endpoint, 53.5% (57/102) of children were SM infected. Parallel comparison of pre- and post-data sets show that there was a 19.1% reduction in SM levels overall following the introduction of the xylitol toothpaste. (p = 0.002). In the participant group with the highest SM level (Level 4), a net 12.2% reduction in SM prevalence occurred. The change in SM infection was deemed statistically significant. Brushing twice a day with toothpaste containing 25% xylitol shows a statistically significant decrease in SM levels. This shows a promising anticariogenic effect. Late SM colonisation is protective for future carious lesions. Xylitol can help prevent early childhood caries and early SM contamination.

Bielefeld Academic Search Engine (BASE), Google Scholar Association for Computing Machinery: Guide to Computing Literature (ACM) and National Library of Medicine: PubMed databases were searched for systematic reviews. This study addressed a structured PICO question (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Population was panoramic radiographs in human subjects. Intervention was use of artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostics, compared to human-only diagnosis. Quantitative or qualitative AI efficiency was the outcome. Systematic reviews were considered if they stated 'systematic review' in their title or abstract, were published in English and were not bound by a certain time frame. No supplemental primary studies were included. Screening and removal of duplicates were performed using the Rayyan tool. Data were extracted from each systematic review by two authors, with a third author having the deciding vote in cases of inconsistency. Cohen's Kappa co-efficient was used to measure reliability between authors, resulting in almost perfect agreement. The risk of bias was accounted for using the ROBIS method which resulted in one paper being rejected, so only 11 included in results. Data were then grouped into seven domains which were detected by AI: teeth identification and numbering, detection of periapical lesions, periodontal bone loss, osteoporosis, maxillary sinusitis, dental caries, and other tasks. The effectiveness of the AI systems was assessed by various outcome metrics - accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and precision being the most common variables. Results of this overview show a significant increase in accuracy of AI in analysing OPTs between 1988-2023. Latest AI models are most accurate in teeth identification and numbering (93.67%) whilst caries detection and osteoporosis showed 91.5% and 89.29% accuracy, respectively. Accurate results were also observed for the detection of maxillary sinusitis and periodontal bone loss. However, given the heterogeneity of source studies used in these systematic reviews, results should be interpreted with caution. With improving AI technology, its use in dental radiology can be increasingly effective in supporting dentists in the detection of different pathologies. This overview has shown that systematic reviews of AI can quickly become outdated and that results of any systematic review should be treated with caution as this field advances. As such, regular updating and ongoing research is required.

Searches were carried out using PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science databases between January 2008 and January 2023. Only articles in English language were included. Boolean operators were used to search: "permanent teeth" OR "permanent tooth" OR "permanent dentition" AND "deep caries" OR "stepwise" AND "partial caries removal OR "stepwise caries removal" OR "pulp vitality" OR "healing rate". Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials, which compared the total removal of carious tissue with either a selective or stepwise removal in permanent teeth with deep carious lesions. Criteria also required a follow up of at least 6 months and publications in English. Exclusion criteria were articles in other languages, articles not comparing different types of total or selective caries removal and articles published before January 2008. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines. Two reviewers independently screened articles, analysing titles and abstracts using Rayyan's Intelligent Systematic Review Platform. They also collected data and risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomised Trials, dividing articles into high risk of bias, few concerns and low risk of bias. A third researcher resolved conflict or doubt in case of divided opinions. In total, 105 articles were identified, and 10 duplicates removed. 95 articles were reviewed by title and abstract and 75 of these did not meet the inclusion criteria. 20 articles were then read, excluding a further 15 due to comparing only partial removal or non-selective caries removal or absence of numerical data. This left 5 articles which met eligibility criteria. These were randomised controlled trials between 2010 and 2021. Follow up ranged from 1 month to 5 years. The inclusion and exclusion criteria in all studies had similar clinical parameters. 3 studies performed management only on permanent molars, whilst the rest also included management on permanent incisors/canines/premolars and molars. Management of caries was divided into non-selective caries removal vs partial caries removal (either selective or stepwise). All but 2 studies included specific information about the materials used. Liners were calcium hydroxide or Dycal, provisional restorations were glass ionomer cements or Ketax Molar and definitive restorations were Herculite Tetric N-Ceram resin, Ivolclar Vivadent or amalgam. Clinical success or failure was measured using pulp vitality, absence of periapical lesions, radiographic analysis and lack of symptoms. Clinical follow up was evaluated by external examiners, although 2 studies did not specify this clearly. There were a variety of tools used for statistical analysis in each study. When comparing non-selective caries removal with either selective or stepwise, 3 studies proposed statistically significant differences in terms of longevity, marginal integrity and success rate of restorations. 1 study stated inexistence of statistically relevant divergences between procedures. Non-selective caries removal is not highly recommended for deep carious lesions and may be considered invasive and risks pulpal exposure. Both selective and stepwise removal are considered conservative approaches. Selective removal is considered the best management option in the short term (with 1.5 years follow up), predominantly related to a lower risk of pulpal exposure. At 5 years, however, the results of selective were similar to those of non-selective, accepting the null hypothesis. There were also no differences in success rates for materials used for definitive restorations.

Electronic search was conducted up to September 2021 in three electronic databases including Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Only studies in English language were selected. Prospective and retrospective studies including cohort, cross-sectional, randomized control trials, and qualitative studies were included. Both the inclusion and exclusion criteria were reported. The search in the databases and the selection of the studies were performed independently by two reviewers. The included studies assessed the effects of clear aligner therapy on the speech difficulty. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. The data from the relevant studies were extracted into a customized Template. The systematic review was carried out and reported based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Details regarding the authors, year of publication, sample size, included participants, age, groups, outcome assessment, results, and inferences were extracted from the selected studies. The quality of the selected studies was assessed based on the relevant guidelines from Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews. The criteria examined sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, outcome data, selective reporting, and other sources of bias. Non-randomized studies were assessed using the ROBINS-I tool (Risk of Bias in Non-randomized studies). The strength of evidence was assessed by the evidence grading system developed by the GRADE collaboration as described in the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The search identified 283 results. 269articles were excluded based on their title and abstract after evaluation against the inclusion criteria. 14 articles were assessed in full text. Finally, 7 papers were included in the qualitative analysis. The included studies were 5 cohort studies and 2 randomized clinical studies. 332 patients were examined in the included studies. There were 195 females and 137 males. 191 patients were treated using clear aligner therapy (CAT) while 122 patients were treated using labial fixed appliances and 19 patients were treated using lingual orthodontic treatment. Out of the 191 patients who were treated using CAT, 179 patients were treated using Invisalign (Santa Clara, CA, USA) while 12 patients were treated using Smile Align (Mumbai, India). All seven selected studies examined speech dysfunction. The speech difficulty was assessed through two tools - semiobjective assessment by speech pathologists and professionals and subjective evaluations by the patients themselves through a patient questionnaire that assess the effects of aligners on speech. The risk of bias assessment revealed that two studies had moderate risk of bias while five articles had serious risk of bias. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the high heterogeneity of the included studies. The level of evidence was assessed as low due to the methodological insufficiencies and risk of bias in the included studies. The results showed that both CAT and fixed appliances (FA) resulted in speech difficulties in terms of clarity and delivery of speech that include speech alteration, slurring of words, lisping, and nasality. Some patients who were treated using CAT reported impairment in the lingual space that affected their speech. Lingual FA resulted in more speech difficulty when compared to labial FA and CAT. Aligners caused errors in the articulation of /s/,/z/,/zh/,/sh/,/th/,/ch/. Acoustic analysis revealed /s/ sound appeared most affected. Aligners had an effect on speech while reading, with patients slowing down to their speed to better articulate. The above-mentioned speech difficulties were transient. The included patients normalized their speech within 7-14 days from start of treatment while few patients took 30-60 days to recover. Although the likelihood of speech difficulties would be high with CAT, the current evidence states that speech difficulties shown with CAT are similar to those found with FA. However, the patients who were treated using CAT adapt quickly and speech recovers within afew weeks. Time to recovery varied greatly, ranging from a week to two months in certain cases.

To identify, qualify and synthesize all studies that assessed if low serum level of 25(OH)D (<50 nmol/L) is associated with dental developmental defects (DDD) in primary teeth. Observational studies or clinical trials were included if measured 25(OH)D serum levels in pregnant women and/or in their children (up to 3 years old) and evaluated the occurrence of DDD in the primary dentition of offspring associated with the low 25(OH)D levels. Literature reviews, case reports, laboratory and/or animals' studies, conference abstracts, letters to the editor, book chapters and clinical protocols were excluded. Searches were carried out in 6 electronic databases and in the gray literature until March 2023, without restrictions. The study quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the certainty of the evidence by GRADE. Data were descriptively synthesized considering the association between DDD and 25(OH)D levels. Seven studies were included. Only developmental enamel defects (DED) were observed after examination of 6651 children. The incidence of DED ranged from 8.9% to 66%. Six studies found no association between low levels of 25(OH)D and DED. However, one reported correlation between hypomineralization of the primary second molar (HSMD) and low levels of 25(OH)D at birth. Methodological flaws were observed in all studies and the certainty of the evidence was very low. Although HSMD was the only DDD associated with low levels of 25(OH)D in children, the available evidence is still not conclusive. More robust studies are needed to endorse the biological plausibility of DDD in primary teeth due to low serum levels of 25(OH)D in pregnant women or in their children. FAPERJ financed this study, which was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022357511).

The research is a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of self-adhesive flowable composite resins (SAFCs) versus conventional flowable composite resins (FCs) used in occlusal cavity restorations in permanent teeth. This research included a search for RCTs. Multiple databases were systematically searched for RCTs with a minimum 1-year follow-up comparing SAFCs to FCs. Outcomes evaluated were retention, secondary caries, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, and postoperative sensitivity based on modified USPHS criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane RoB 2 tool. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted where applicable. Certainty of evidence was rated using GRADE approach. Five RCTs (four parallel and one split mouth) comprising 138 patients were included. During 1- and 2-year recalls, there were generally no significant differences in clinical performance between SAFCs and FCs. However, FCs applied using the etch-and-rinse technique demonstrated statistically better marginal adaptation at 2 years (3 studies, RR 3.21, 95% CI 1.50-6.83) and marginal discoloration (4 studies, RR 3.40, 95% CI 1.10-10.48). The overall quality of evidence ranged from low to moderate. SAFCs showed comparable short-term outcomes to FCs in treating occlusal cavities. Further high-quality RCTs with longer follow-up are warranted to confirm long-term performance of SAFCs. Use of separate enamel etching may improve marginal adaptation and discoloration with FCs.