Hormonal contraception (HC) is a well-recognized protection against endometrial cancer (EC) in the general population. It has not been established if this is also applicable to women with Lynch syndrome (LS), a condition associated with a up to 50% lifetime risk of developing EC. The objective of this study was to evaluate if the use of HC influences the incidence of endometrial hyperplasia and EC in women with LS by comparing the histology of annual endometrial biopsies obtained in patients with LS who are using HC versus non-users. This is a retrospective cohort study conducted with endometrial biopsies obtained in women 30 to 50 years of age with LS. The Pearson Chi-square test was performed to compare the prevalence of cancer and hyperplasia in the HC users and in the non-HC users groups. A total of 164 endometrial biopsies obtained among 75 women were suitable for analysis. Among the 86 biopsies obtained in the non-HC group, 81.4% (70/86) were normal. Two cases of endometrial carcinoma (2.3%) and 6 endometrial hyperplasia without atypia were found (7.0%). Among the 78 biopsies performed in patients using HC, 78.2% (61/78) were normal. Three endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (3.8%) and three cases of EC were diagnosed (3.8%). This study suggests that, in women of 30 to 50 years of age with LS, the use of hormonal contraception does not seem to decrease the occurrence of endometrial hyperplasia/carcinoma on annual endometrial histology.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a deadly disease that is the result of an accumulation of sequential genetic alterations. These genetic alterations can either be inherited, such as pathogenic germline variants that are associated with an increased risk of cancer, or acquired, such as somatic mutations that occur during the lifetime of an individual. Understanding the genetic basis of inherited risk of PDAC is essential to advancing patient care and outcomes through improved clinical surveillance, early detection initiatives, and targeted therapies. In this review we discuss factors associated with an increased risk of PDAC, the prevalence of genetic variants associated with an increased risk in patients with PDAC, estimates of PDAC risk in carriers of pathogenic germline variants in genes associated with an increased risk of PDAC. The role of common variants in pancreatic cancer risk will also be discussed.

Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

CHEK2 is a well-established breast cancer susceptibility gene. The most frequent pathogenic CHEK2 variant is 1100delC, a loss-of-function mutation conferring 2-fold risk for breast cancer. This gene also harbors other rare variants encountered in the clinical gene panels for hereditary cancer. One of these is CHEK2 c.1312 G > T, p.(Asp438Tyr) in the kinase domain of the protein, but due to its rarity its clinical significance for breast cancer predisposition has remained unclear. Here, we tested the prevalence of CHEK2 p.(Asp438Tyr) allele showing enrichment in the Northern Finnish population, in a total of 2284 breast cancer patients from this geographical region. Genotyping was performed for DNA samples extracted from peripheral blood using high-resolution melt analysis. Fourteen CHEK2 p.(Asp438Tyr) carriers were identified (14/2284, 0.6%, P = 0.67): two in the cohort of breast cancer cases with the indication of inherited disease susceptibility (2/281, 0.7%, P = 1.00) and twelve in the breast cancer cohort unselected for the family history of disease and age at disease onset (12/2003, 0.6%, P = 0.66). This frequency did not differ from the frequency in the general population (10/1299, 0.8%). No CHEK2 p.(Asp438Tyr) homozygotes were identified. Our results indicate that CHEK2 p.(Asp438Tyr) carriers do not have an increased risk for breast cancer and the classification of the CHEK2 p.(Asp438Tyr) variant can be changed from the variant of uncertain significance (VUS) to likely benign for breast cancer.

Variants in hereditary cancer risk genes are frequently identified following tumor-based DNA sequencing and represent an opportunity to diagnose hereditary cancer. We implemented an automated hereditary cancer screening program in a large HMO for all patients who underwent tumor-based DNA sequencing to identify patients with hereditary cancer and determine if this approach augmented existing genetic counseling approaches driven by personal/family history criteria. Regular automated searches of a centralized tumor DNA variant database were performed for ATM, BRCA1, BRCA2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PALB2, and/or PMS2 variants, and germline hereditary cancer gene panel testing was offered to patients with tumor variants who had never undergone germline testing. Patients completing germline testing due to their tumor DNA test results were considered part of the tumor DNA safety net. Patients previously completing germline testing via traditional genetic counseling and tumor DNA safety net were compared for demographics, tumor type, presence of germline pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variant, and whether NCCN criteria were met for hereditary cancer genetic testing. Germline P/LP variants were common in both groups. Patients who received germline testing through traditional genetic counseling were more likely to have cardinal hereditary tumors than the tumor DNA safety net group. Patients identified with hereditary cancer through traditional genetic counseling were more likely to meet NCCN personal/family history criteria for germline testing than the tumor DNA safety net group (99% versus 34%). A universal tumor DNA safety net screen is an important diagnostic strategy which augments traditional genetic counseling approaches based on personal/family history.

This study aimed to identify determinants of adherence to lifestyle and body weight recommendations for cancer prevention among Lynch Syndrome (LS) patients. Cross-sectional baseline data of LS patients participating in the Lifestyle & Lynch (LiLy) study was used to assess determinants of adherence to the World Cancer Research Fund cancer prevention recommendations on body weight, physical activity, and red and processed meat intake. Adherence and potential determinants of adherence were assessed using questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify determinants of adherence. Of the 211 participants, 50.2% adhered to the body weight recommendation, 78.7% adhered to the physical activity recommendation, and 33.6% adhered to the red and processed meat recommendation. Being younger and having a higher level of education were associated with adherence to the recommendation on body weight. Having knowledge about the recommendation was associated with adherence to the recommendations on physical activity and red and processed meat. Results confirm that knowledge about recommendations for cancer prevention is an important determinant for adherence and suggest that strategies to increase knowledge should be included in lifestyle promotion targeted at LS patients, along with behavior change techniques influencing other modifiable determinants.

Individuals with genetic disease face unique challenges related to navigating dating relationships. While previous studies have explored the impact of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome on dating, research investigating psychosocial implications for young adults with early-onset multi-organ tumor predisposition syndromes such as von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL) is scarce. This study assessed young adults' attitudes towards dating and decisions related to disclosing a diagnosis of VHL to a dating partner. Twenty-six young adults with VHL participated in semi-structured interviews exploring this issue, using a guide informed by the literature in consultation with providers and an individual with VHL. Interviews were coded with a primarily deductive approach using codes derived from the literature, with inductive coding employed for perspectives unique to VHL. Our results support previous findings that genetic disease contributes to fear of rejection due to decreased desirability. However, participants report that partners' reactions to VHL uniquely exacerbate this concern due to unfamiliarity with VHL and a perception that it is exceptionally serious, leading to different strategies in disclosure. While many cited negative reactions from partners, participants also described how disclosure can strengthen relationships by deepening trust. Participants discussed a desire for healthcare providers to offer support in this context and described the benefit of speaking with peers about their dating experiences and approaches to disclosure. Our findings provide insight into the diverse needs of young adults with VHL as they approach romantic relationships and decision-making regarding disclosure and highlight the importance of patient-centered support from providers and patient organizations.

Germline genetic testing is recommended for all patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) but uptake rates are low. We implemented a mainstreaming program in oncology clinics to increase testing for PC patients. Genetic counselors trained oncology providers to offer a standardized multigene panel and obtain informed consent using an educational video. Pre-test genetic counseling was available upon request. Otherwise, patients with identified pathogenic variants, strong family history, or questions regarding their results were referred for post-test genetic counseling. We measured rates of testing and genetic counseling visits. From September 2019 to April 2021, 245 patients with PC underwent genetic testing. This represents a 6.5-fold increase in germline testing volume (95% confidence interval 5.2–8.1) compared to previous years. At least one pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (PV/LPV) was found in 34 (13.9%) patients, including 17 (6.9%) PV/LPVs in high or moderate risk genes and 18 (7.3%) in low risk or recessive genes. Five (2.0%) PVs had implications on treatment selection. 22 of the positive patients (64.7%) and an additional 8 PC patients (1 negative, 3 VUS, and 4 pre-test) underwent genetic counseling during the study period. Genetic counselors saw 2.0 PC patients/month prior to this project, 1.6 PC patients/month during this project, and would have seen 2.2 PC patients/month if all patients with pathogenic variants attended post-test counseling. Conclusions Mainstreaming genetic testing expands access for PC patients without overwhelming genetic counseling resources.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10689-022-00300-5.

Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes increase the risk for various cancers including breast, ovarian, prostate, pancreas and melanoma. Identifying BRCA1/2 mutation carriers enables risk assessment, surveillance, early detection and risk reduction. In certain Israeli sub-populations recurring and founder mutations have been identified and for these, testing for founder mutations is simple, efficient and cost-effective. Founder mutations in the Jewish Ethiopian population have not been described. We report here the identification of a recurring BRCA2 mutation in the Ethiopian Jewish population; c.5159C>A; p.Ser1720Ter, which has only been described once before in this population. In addition, in another family of the same origin we found the BRCA2 c.7579delG; p.Val2527Ter mutation that has been previously described in two different Jewish Ethiopian families. In Israel genetic testing is performed in a sequential stepwise manner, first testing a panel of predominant mutations and if negative further testing by gene sequencing is offered. Recently it has been decided to expand the founder mutation panel to include mutations which have been found in two or more separate families. This new panel will include the BRCA2 c.7579delG; p.Val2527Ter mutation, and we recommend that the BRCA2 c.5159C>A; p.Ser1720Ter mutation should also be added to the new predominant mutation panel.

Inversions, i.e. a change in orientation of a segment of DNA, are a recognized cause of human diseases which remain overlooked due to their balanced nature. Inversions can have severe or more subtle impacts on gene expression. We describe two families that exemplify these aspects and underline the need for inversion detection in routine diagnosis. The first family (F1) displayed a sibship with two constitutional mismatch repair deficiency patients and a family history of colon cancer in the paternal branch. The second family (F2) displayed a severe history of Lynch syndrome. These families were analyzed using a whole gene panel (WGP) strategy i.e. including colon cancer genes with their intronic and flanking genomic regions. In F1, a PMS2 inversion encompassing the promoter region to intron 1 and a PMS2 splice variant were found in the maternal and paternal branch, respectively. In F2, we described the first MSH6 inversion, involving the 5' part of MSH6 and the 3' part of the nearby gene ANXA4. Inversion detection mandates genomic sequencing, but makes a valuable contribution to the diagnostic rate. WGP is an attractive strategy as it maximizes the detection power on validated genes and keeps sufficient depth to detect de novo events.