Previous studies have shown a correlation between surgeons with high annual volume and better outcomes after various surgical procedures. However, the preexisting literature regarding groin hernia repair and annual surgeon volume is limited. The aim was to investigate how annual surgeon volume affected the reoperation rates for recurrence after primary groin hernia repair. This nationwide cohort study was based on data from the Danish Hernia Database and the Danish Patient Safety Authority's Online Register. Patients ≥ 18years undergoing laparoscopic or Lichtenstein primary groin hernia repair between November 2011 and January 2020 were included. Annual surgeon volume was divided into five categories: ≤ 10, 11-25, 26-50, 51-100, and > 100 cases/year. We included 25,262 groin hernia repairs performed in 23,088 patients. The risk of reoperation for recurrence after Lichtenstein repair was significantly higher for the volume categories of ≤ 10 (HR 4.02), 11-25 (HR 3.64), 26-50 (HR 3.93), or 51-100 (HR 4.30), compared with the > 100 category. The risk of reoperation for recurrence after laparoscopic repair was significantly increased for the volume categories of ≤ 10 (HR 1.89), 11-25 (HR 2.08), 26-50 (HR 1.80), and 51-100 (HR 1.58) compared with the > 100 category. The risk of reoperation for recurrence was significantly higher after Lichtenstein and laparoscopic repairs performed by surgeons with < 100 cases/year compared with > 100 cases/year. This indicates that higher surgeon volume minimizes the risk of reoperation for recurrence after groin hernia repair.

To compare two cohorts of patients; those with isolated ventral hernias (VH) and those with VH and enterocutaneous fistulas (ECF). Risk factors for surgical complications (including recurrent ECF) and outcomes during single-stage VH with ECF surgical reconstruction were analyzed. A retrospective review was performed from 2008 to 2019. We compared two cohorts of patients with single-stage VH repairs: (1) ventral hernia repair alone (hernia alone), and (2) combined VH repair and ECF repair (hernia plus ECF). Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 18years of age with pre-operative VH either with or without an ECF, who underwent open hernia repair and ECF repair in a single-stage operation, with a minimum follow-up of 12months. Patient risk factors, operative characteristics, outcomes and surgical-site complications were compared using univariate and multivariate analyses. We included 442 patients (hernia alone = 401; hernia plus ECF = 41) with a median follow-up of 22months (12-96). Hernia plus ECF patients were more likely to have inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)(OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.1-17.5, p = 0.037), a history of abdominal wound infections (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.5-7.9, p = 0.004), reoperations (OR 4.9, 95% CI 1.6-15.4, p = 0.006), superficial soft tissue infections (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.1-6.1, p = 0.044) and hematomas (OR 8.4, 95% CI 1.2-58.8, p = 0.031), compared to hernia alone patients. ECF recurrence was associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 8, 73% vs. n = 6, 20%; p = 0.003) and surgical-site complications (n = 10, 91% vs. n = 16, 53%; p = 0.048), compared to ECF resolution. Risk factors for developing ECF were IBD and history of abdominal wound infections. Single-staged combined ECF reconstruction was associated with reoperations, soft tissue infections and hematomas. DM and surgical-site complications were associated with ECF recurrence.

Patients who present with symptomatic, clinically occult, radiologically evident (SCORE) inguinal hernia represent diagnostic and therapeutic challenge with a wide differential diagnosis of groin pain. Often, diagnosis leads to surgical intervention despite the lack of evidence supporting this practice. This study evaluates patient-reported outcomes following surgical or conservative management of SCORE inguinal hernia. Single-centre retrospective review of radiology database and general surgery outpatient booking system between 2017 and 2018 to identify SCORE hernia patients. Notes review to identify surgical and conservative management groups. Patient-reported outcomes determined using the validated EuraHS-QOL tool. Surveys sent to patients via post with follow-up telephone conversations between October 2019 and June 2020. Replies from the conservative and operative cohorts were compared. Total of 76 patients identified. 63 (83%) replies received and analysed (10 did not answer, 2 declined, 1 deceased). 32 in the surgical cohort and 31 in conservative management cohort. No statistically significant difference was there between cohorts in age, BMI, ASA, Charlson Comorbidity Index. No statistically significant difference was there in pain at the site of hernia (p = 0.535); restrictions of activities (p = 0.406); cosmetic discomfort (p = 0.289) in patient-reported outcomes between surgical and conservative cohorts. There is no difference in pain, restriction to function or cosmesis in symptomatic clinically occult, radiologically evident inguinal hernia patients following either surgical or conservative management. A clear definition and further studies are essential to deliver better care for this population of patients.

IntroductionAmong many other techniques for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (AWR), posterior component separation with Transversus Abdominis Release (TAR), continues to gain popularity and it is increasingly used with promising long-term results. Our goal was to evaluate the influence of TAR with mesh retromuscular reinforcement on the intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and respiratory function in a series of patients with complex incisional hernias (IH).MethodsSince November 2014 through February 2019, patients with TAR were identified in the Clinical Department of Surgery database and were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome measures include: demographics, pre- and perioperative details, preoperative and postoperative IAP and plateau pressure (PP).ResultsOne-hundred-and-one consecutive TAR procedures (19.7% from all incisional hernia repairs) were analyzed. Mean age was 63 years with a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 31.85 kg/m2 (25–51). Diabetes and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) were the main major comorbidities. Mean hernia defect area was 247 cm2 (104–528 cm2).ConclusionTAR is a safe and sound procedure with acceptable modifications of the IAP morbidity and recurrence rate when correctly performed on the right patient.

PurposeDiastasis recti abdominis (DRA) or rectus diastasis is an acquired condition in which the rectus muscles are separated by an abnormal distance along their length, but with no fascia defect.To data there is no consensus about risk factors for DRA. The aim of this article is to critically review the literature about prevalence and risk factor of DRA.MethodA total of 13 papers were identified.ResultsThe real prevalence of DRA is unknown because the prevalence rate varies with measurement method, measurement site and judgment criteria, but it is certainly an extremely frequent condition. Numbers of parity, BMI, diabetes are the most plausible risk factors.We identified a new anatomical variation in cadaveric dissection and in abdominal CT image evaluation: along the semilunar line the internal oblique aponeurosis could join the rectus sheath with only a posterior layer, so without a double layer (anterior and posterior) as usually described. We conducted a retrospective review of abdominal CT images and the presence of the posterior insertion only could be considered as a risk factor for DRA.ConclusionFurther studies with large sample size, including nulliparous, primiparous, pluriparous and men too, are necessary for identify the real prevalence

The original article can be found online.

To present a novel technique for the repair of parastomal hernias. A total of 15 patients underwent parastomal hernia repair. A robotic Sugarbaker technique was utilized for repair. The fascial defect was closed prior to robotic intraperitoneal placement of the mesh. Baseline demographics of the patients were obtained, and intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were tracked. The etiology of the ostomies was oncologic in all but three patients. Five of the stomas were urostomies (33.3%). Patient characteristics were as follows: age 64.9.1 ± 9.3years, BMI 30.1 ± 4.7kg/m2, smoking history 60.0%, and diabetes 6.7%. The mean size of the hernia defect was 46.0 ± 40.1 cm2 with a mesh size of 372.0 ± 101.2 cm2. The mean operative time was 182.0 ± 51.9min. In seven patients, an inferolateral preperitoneal flap was created for mesh placement. Intraoperatively, only one enterotomy was made during dissection, which was repaired without complication. The mean length of stay was 4.2 ± 1.9days. There was only one hernia recurrence (6.7%). There were no wound complications, surgical site infections, or mesh infections. A mean follow-up time of 14.2 ± 9.4months was achieved. Robotic Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair is a safe and effective technique. The results demonstrate the feasibility of fascial closure with this technique and a low recurrence rate. The authors propose this technique should be widely considered for parastomal hernia repair.

To quantitatively assess the use of patient-reported outcome measures in studies involving patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. We performed a systematic literature search in Medline and EMBASE. We included all studies published between 2000 and 2019 that involved > 5 patients receiving inguinal hernia repair and evaluated a postoperative patient-reported outcome measure. Studies were stratified in 5-year intervals. We extracted data on which patient-reported outcome measure was used, its time of administration, study design, and the size and composition of the study population. Data were presented using descriptive statistics. We included 929 studies that covered 81 different patient-reported outcome measures. Of these, the Short-Form 36 was the most commonly used generic instrument (14%), the Carolinas Comfort Scale was the most commonly used hernia-specific instrument (5%), and the Visual Analogue Scale was the most commonly used domain-specific instrument (70%). There was a proportional decrease in the use of generic instruments, from 24% of studies in 2000-2004 to only 14% of studies in 2015-2019. Conversely, there was an increase in the use of hernia-specific instruments, from 0% in 2000-2004 to 18% in 2015-2019. There is heterogeneity in the use of patient-reported outcome measures in the field of inguinal hernia research. The use of hernia-specific instruments is increasing, the use of generic instruments is decreasing, and the use of domain-specific instruments remains consistently high. This study serves as a repository of all available patient-reported outcome measures relevant to patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

PurposeResults of the most commonly used inguinal hernia repair techniques often originate from expert centers or from randomized controlled studies. In this study, we portray daily-practice results of a high-volume, regional surgical group in the Netherlands, comparing TREPP (open (posterior) transrectus sheath pre-peritoneal) with Lichtenstein (open anterior) and TEP (endoscopic (posterior) totally extraperitoneal). We hypothesize that the TREPP shows more favorable outcome compared to the current gold standard procedures: TEP and Lichtenstein.MethodsBetween January 2016 and December 2018, 3285 consecutive patients underwent surgical treatment and were included for analysis. The outcome measures were postoperative pain, recurrence rate and other surgical complications. Propensity-score matching was used to address potential selection bias.ResultsAfter propensity-score matching, there was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain in the TREPP group compared to the Lichtenstein group (TREPP 7.3% versus Lichtenstein 6.3%; p = 0.67) nor in TREPP compared to TEP (TREPP 7.4% versus TEP 4.1%; p = 0.064). There was no statistically significant difference in recurrences in the TREPP group compared to Lichtenstein (3.8% vs 2.5%; p = 0.42), nor in the TREPP versus TEP comparison (3.9% vs 2.8%; p = 0.55)ConclusionThis study compares TREPP with Lichtenstein and TEP in the presence of postoperative pain, recurrences and other adverse outcomes. After propensity-score matching, no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain or recurrences remained between either TREPP compared to Lichtenstein, or TREPP compared to TEP. Based on these results, TREPP, Lichtenstein and TEP showed comparable results in postoperative pain, recurrences and other surgical site complications.