1 ture as NLCV, 6 while it is termed as MDCV in cases with previous SV history. 7,8V is not a mystery for most gastroenterologists and surgeons due to its relatively high incidence.However, NLCV or MDCV is a quite rare clinical entity, which gained currency in recent years. 6,7An electronic data search under the head of "neo-left colon volvulus or metachronous descending colon volvulus" of the last 80 years' literature (from 1945 to date) in Web of Science 9 and PubMed 10 databases revealed limited availability of publications on this subject.The detailed research of above-mentioned reports demonstrated 6 cases in association with NLCV or MDCV following sigmoidectomy.Among them, primary pathology was SV in 4 cases, 7,8,11,12 while colonic carcinoma in the remaining 2 cases. 6,13However, easy and early diagnosis of SV and colonic malignancies due to advanced endoscopic or radiological diagnostic procedures and improved prognosis arising from laparoscopic colon surgery may cause an increase in number of such cases in the near future. [13][14]][15] Characteristics obtained from 6 patients presented in the literature are summarized in Table 1.A medical history of a previous left colon surgery is an important mnemonic in the diagnosis of NLCV or MDCV.Most likely, due to previous SV in most cases, these clinical entities generally occur in elderly men. [6][7][8][11]11][12][13] Abdominal pain/tenderness, distention, and inability to pass stool or gas are the main clinical features similar to primary SV, while vomiting, empty rectum in digital examination, and hyperkinetic bowel sounds are other symptoms and signs. 7,8,11,12Erect abdominal X-ray radiographs show distend-

Filgotinib is an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). This study aimed to assess symptomatic response with filgotinib 200 mg (FIL200) according to disease severity using baseline partial Mayo Clinic Score (pMCS). In the phase 2b/3 SELECTION study (NCT02914522), adults with moderate-to-severe UC were randomized to receive FIL200, filgotinib 100 mg, or placebo for 11 weeks in induction studies A (biologic-naive) and B (biologic-experienced). In this post hoc analysis, symptomatic remission (Mayo rectal bleeding subscore of 0 and stool frequency subscore ≤ 1) rates were assessed daily from baseline to day 15 and fortnightly from week 2 to week 10 by baseline pMCS (pMCS ≥ 7, pMCS < 7) in patients who received induction FIL200. Of those who received FIL200 in induction studies A and B, 90 and 148 patients had a pMCS ≥ 7, and 155 and 114 had a pMCS < 7, respectively. Symptomatic remission rates were generally significantly higher in the pMCS < 7 than ≥ 7 group from day 2-15 (day 2: 8.4% vs. 1.1%, P= 0.009 [induction study A]; 8.8% vs. 0.7%, P= 0.004 [induction study B]). However, by week 10, there was no longer a significant difference in the rates between the pMCS ≥ 7 and < 7 groups (43.3% vs. 54.8%, P= 0.124 [induction study A]; 26.4% vs. 39.5%, P= 0.099 [induction study B]). Symptomatic response to FIL200 occurred more rapidly in the less severe disease groups than in the more severe disease groups; however, regardless of disease severity, both groups benefited from continued FIL200 treatment.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) was once considered rare in Korea, with the first reported case documented in 1961. Since then, its incidence and prevalence have increased markedly, accompanied by significant progress in clinical care and research. This narrative review traces the historical evolution of IBD in Korea, dividing the timeline into 4 periods: 1960-1979, 1980-1999, 2000-2019, and 2020-2039. For each period, major developments in the research environment and trends, diagnostic process, patient population and characteristics, and treatment are outlined. Over the past 6 decades, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in Korea have advanced markedly, transitioning from limited diagnostic capacity and symptom-based management to practices that align with global standards. Notably, Korean patients with IBD exhibit distinctive clinical features compared with Western counterparts, including a markedly higher proportion of proctitis and a lower long-term risk of colectomy in ulcerative colitis, and a substantially higher prevalence of perianal fistulas in Crohn's disease, highlighting the need for population- specific strategies to advance personalized medicine. In parallel, the research landscape has evolved through multicenter collaborations, expanded research capacity, and growing international engagement, positioning Korea as an increasingly active contributor to the global IBD research community. Looking ahead, the future of IBD research in Korea is expected to be shaped by innovation-driven research, including advances in artificial intelligence, large-scale data integration, and deeper international collaboration. By tracing the clinical and research trajectory of IBD in Korea, this review offers insight into how the country has adapted to global trends and is preparing to meet future challenges.

Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its efficacy, safety, and the appropriate dosage have not been extensively investigated in the Japanese population. This phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging, 12-week trial was carried out among Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive etrasimod 1 mg once daily (QD), etrasimod 2 mg QD, or placebo. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving clinical remission at week 12. Secondary efficacy endpoints and treatmentemergent adverse events (TEAEs) were also investigated. Efficacy endpoints were presented as proportions of patients achieving each outcome. Overall, 17, 19, and 18 patients received etrasimod 1 mg QD, etrasimod 2 mg QD, and placebo, respectively. One patient receiving etrasimod 1 mg (6.7%), 5 patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg (26.3%), and no patients receiving placebo (0%) achieved clinical remission. More patients receiving etrasimod versus placebo achieved secondary endpoints, except endoscopic normalization, at week 12. TEAEs were experienced by 9 patients receiving etrasimod 1 mg (52.9%), 13 patients receiving etrasimod 2 mg (68.4%), and 10 patients receiving placebo (55.6%). None of the TEAEs were serious and none experienced by patients receiving etrasimod led to treatment discontinuation. Overall, etrasimod 2 mg QD for up to 12 weeks appeared efficacious and safe in these Japanese patients with moderately to severely active UC. All TEAEs were mild to moderate in severity. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05061446).

Tofacitinib and upadacitinib are small-molecule compounds that inhibit the Janus kinase pathway for the treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis. Only a few reports have compared the efficacy and safety of these 2 drugs in real-world practice. We aimed to show our real-world evidence of these drugs and compare the efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of ulcerative colitis. This study is a single-center retrospective analysis. Patients treated with tofacitinib or upadacitinib at our hospital between June 2018 and January 2024 who were monitored for 24 weeks were included. The primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were response and remission rates at each time point, time series changes in partial Mayo scores and laboratory results, treatment survival at 24 weeks, and the incidence of adverse events. A total of 68 patients treated with tofacitinib and 34 patients treated with upadacitinib were included. Steroid-free clinical remission rate at 24 weeks was significantly higher in upadacitinib-treated patients than in tofacitinibtreated patients (64.7% vs. 38.2%). The response rates in upadacitinib-treated patients exceeded 60% after 8 weeks of treatment through to 24 weeks, and the rates were higher than those in tofacitinib-treated patients. The incidences of adverse events were 79.4% in upadacitinib-treated patients and 38.2% in tofacitinib-treated patients. The most common adverse event was acne for upadacitinib. Upadacitinib was more effective than tofacitinib in inducing remission in ulcerative colitis patients. The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher with upadacitinib than tofacitinib.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing across the globe, more so in populous countries like India. We aimed to study the disease burden and epidemiological trends of IBD in India and look closer into the disease pattern across the country from 1990 to 2019. The burden of IBD was estimated in India using the data from the Global Burden of Disease estimate for 2019, which is a comprehensive worldwide project. The analysis included various parameters like incidence, prevalence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years, years lived with disability, and years of life lost as age-adjusted rates (per 100,000 population). Using modeling, the prediction was also made for 2050 in India. The age-standardized incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability rates of IBD in India for 2019 were 2.34, 20.34, 0.40, and 13.04, respectively. These are lower than the global incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability rates of 4.97, 59.25, 0.54, and 20.15, respectively. The annual rates of change in incidence, prevalence, mortality, and disability rates in India from 1990 to 2019 were 0.05, -0.02, -0.36, and -0.35, respectively. The annual rates of change in incidence and prevalence are higher than the global rate of -0.18 and -0.19, while the annual rates of change in mortality and disability are lower than the global rate of -0.19 and -0.26. The incidence and prevalence of IBD in India are lower compared to the global population but are increasing at a faster rate than the global population.

Data from Asia regarding the short-term and long-term outcomes for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) are limited. We assessed the outcomes of ASUC, identified the risk factors for colectomy, and compared colectomy rates between the pre-biologics and post-biologics eras in Taiwan. The patients with an ASUC diagnosis between January 2013 and March 2022 at 5 tertiary medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. In total, 98 patients were enrolled, with 68.4% diagnosed in the post-biologics era. In 78.6% of the ASUC patients initially received intravenous steroid therapy, for which the success rate was 74.1%. As for rescue therapy, 15 patients (93.8%) received biologics and 1 (6.3%) received cyclosporin. Biologics rescue therapy had a 93.3% success rate. One (1%) mortality due to septic shock occurred. The colectomy rate for index ASUC admission was 11.2%. Patients receiving colectomy were predominantly male (P= 0.012) and at older age (P= 0.016). Higher C-reactive protein (P= 0.035), lower albumin (P= 0.017), and hemoglobin (P= 0.023) levels were associated with colectomy risk. During a median follow-up of 24 months, 13 patients (15.1%) had recurrent ASUC and 23.1% of patients received colectomy. The accumulated colectomy rate at 3 years did not differ between the pre- and post-biologics eras (16.1% vs. 13.4%, P= 0.270). This is the first Asian study on ASUC to compare colectomy rates between the prebiologics and post-biologics eras, revealing no significant difference. The recurrent ASUC had a higher colectomy rate than the index ASUC.

Serum leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) is a potential biomarker of Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of LRG in predicting clinical relapse in patients in remission with CD. This retrospective observational study assessed the relationships among patient-reported outcome (PRO2), LRG, and other blood markers. The influence of LRG on clinical relapse was assessed in patients in remission with CD. Data of 94 patients tested for LRG between January 2021 and May 2023 were collected. LRG level did not correlate with PRO2 score (ρ = 0.06); however, it strongly correlated with C-reactive protein (CRP) level (r=0.79) and serum albumin level (r=-0.70). Among 69 patients in clinical remission, relapse occurred in 22 patients (31.9%). In the context of predicting relapse, LRG showed the highest area under the curve, followed by CRP level, platelet count, and albumin level. Multivariate analysis revealed that only LRG (P= 0.02) was an independent factor for predicting clinical remission. The cumulative non-relapse rate was significantly higher in patients with LRG < 13.8 μg/mL than in patients in remission with LRG ≥ 13.8 μg/mL and normal CRP level (P= 0.002) or normal albumin level (P= 0.001). Cumulative non-relapse rate was also higher in patients with LRG < 13.8 μg/mL compared to those with LRG ≥ 13.8 μg/mL in patients with L3 or B2+B3 of Montreal calcification. LRG is useful in predicting clinical relapse in patients with CD during biological remission. LRG is a useful biomarker for predicting prognosis, even in patients with intestinal stenosis, or previous/present fistulas.

The efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for the treatment of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC) has been demonstrated in clinical trials. Although, a series of reports with real-world evidence of its short-term efficacy and safety profiles have already been published, reports of long-term real-world data have been limited. We aimed to show our 3-year evidence on the clinical use of tofacitinib for the treatment of UC, focusing on its efficacy and safety profiles. A retrospective observational study was conducted on patients who started tofacitinib for active refractory UC at our hospital. The primary outcome was the retention rate until 156 weeks after initiating tofacitinib. The secondary outcomes were short-term efficacy at 4, 8, and 12 weeks; long-term efficacy at 52, 104, and 156 weeks; prognostic factors related to the cumulative retention rate; loss of response; and safety profile, including adverse events. Forty-six patients who were able to be monitored for up to 156 weeks after tofacitinib initiation, were enrolled in this study. Continuation of tofacitinib was possible until 156 weeks in 54.3%, with > 50% response rates and > 40% remission rates. Among patients in whom response or remission was achieved and tofacitinib was deescalated after 8 weeks of induction treatment, 54.3% experienced relapse but were successfully rescued by and retained on reinduction treatment, except for 1 patient. No serious AEs were observed in the study. Tofacitinib is effective and safe as long-term treatment in a refractory cohort of UC patients in real-world clinical practice.