Research Article2110.1016/j.jfs.2022.101038Liquidity and bank capital structureJul 03, 2022Journal of Financial StabilityAjay Patel + 2 more +2CiteListenSave
Research Article310.1016/j.jfs.2022.101024Financial intermediation and the supply of liquidityMay 28, 2022Journal of Financial StabilityJonathan KreamerCiteListenSave
Research Article1010.1016/j.jfs.2022.101013Corporate debt and unconventional monetary policy: The risk-taking channel with bond and loan contractsApr 21, 2022Journal of Financial StabilitySumiko Takaoka + 1 more +1CiteListenSave
Research Article3310.1016/j.jfs.2022.101008Growth-at-risk and macroprudential policy designApr 20, 2022Journal of Financial StabilityJavier SuarezCiteListenSave
Research Article1510.1016/j.jfs.2022.100971Political uncertainty and analysts’ forecasts: International evidenceJan 20, 2022Journal of Financial StabilityNarjess Boubakri + 2 more +2CiteListenSave
Research Article14010.1016/j.jfs.2021.100964When bad news is good news: Geopolitical risk and the cross-section of emerging market stock returnsDec 09, 2021Journal of Financial StabilityAdam Zaremba + 3 more +3CiteListenSave
Research Article3810.1016/j.jfs.2021.100936Economic uncertainty and corruption: Evidence from public and private firmsSep 08, 2021Journal of Financial StabilityMansoor Afzali + 2 more +2We study the influence of policy uncertainty on the moral behavior of firms. When facing uncertainty, managers perceive various socioeconomic obstacles as more severe and disruptive to their business. Using data from policy uncertainty spouts in 93 countries, we document that some firms engage in norm-deviant behavior by cheating on taxes and paying more bribes. While private firms prefer to cheat on taxes, public firms choose bribery as a favorite tool to “grease the wheels” during periods of uncertainty. Strong social capital (local trust and religiosity) breaks this link between uncertainty and corruption.Read moreCiteListenSave
Research Article1510.1016/j.jfs.2021.100932The risk implications of the business loan activity in credit unionsAug 21, 2021Journal of Financial StabilityJavier Gomez-Biscarri + 2 more +2US credit unions have been subject to a strict regulation of their commercial lending which included both requirements for enhanced organizational practices and a cap on the proportion of business loans relative to assets (imposed in 1998 by US Congress). Since 2003, however, these limitations have been steadily relaxed, a process which has resulted in an increase in credit union business lending activity. Using data from the universe of US credit unions we provide comprehensive evidence that expansion of the business loan portfolio increases the risk of the asset side of the credit union. This is the case even for credit unions which benefit from partnership with the SBA, for which we observe an initial increase in the risk of non-SBA backed loans (an overconfidence effect) which reverses over time (a learning effect). Our results suggest, furthermore, that the risk of business loans is exacerbated for credit unions which initiate their business loan activity and which do so rapidly. In the second part of our analysis we provide descriptive and quasi-experimental evidence that expansions of credit union activity into business loans are associated with lower subsequent growth rates of deposits. This result is similar to the reaction to risk indicators found in the banking literature and might give an ex-ante incentive for the CU that could work as a market-based stabilization mechanism complementary to that of explicit regulation.Read moreCiteListenSave
Front Matter10.1016/s1572-3089(21)00058-9Editorial BoardJun 01, 2021Journal of Financial StabilityCiteListenSave
Front Matter10.1016/j.jfs.2021.100905Foreword from the European CommissionJun 01, 2021Journal of Financial StabilityMariya GabrielCiteListenSave