Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2026.103932Spread too thin: The impact of lean inventoriesMar 26, 2026Journal of Monetary EconomicsJulio L OrtizCiteListenSave
Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2026.103902Firm dynamics and random search over the business cycleMar 01, 2026Journal of Monetary EconomicsRichard AudolyCiteListenSave
Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2026.103919Explicit consumption functions with borrowing constraints: A continuous-time approachMar 01, 2026Journal of Monetary EconomicsJordan Roulleau-PasdeloupCiteListenSave
Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103870Dissecting the great retirement boomJan 01, 2026Journal of Monetary EconomicsSerdar Birinci + 2 more +2CiteListenSave
Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103873Bridging micro and macro production functions: The fiscal multiplier of infrastructure investmentJan 01, 2026Journal of Monetary EconomicsMinsu Chang + 1 more +1CiteListenSave
Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103848Oil price fluctuations, US banks, and macroprudential policyDec 01, 2025Journal of Monetary EconomicsPaolo Gelain + 1 more +1CiteListenSave
Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103839Overconfidence in private information explains biases in professional forecastsNov 01, 2025Journal of Monetary EconomicsKlaus Adam + 2 more +2We observe a rich set of public information signals available to participants in the Survey of Professional Forecasters (SPF) and decompose individual forecast revisions into those due to public information and a remainder due to residual information. We find that SPF forecasters overreact to residual information at almost all forecast horizons and for almost all forecast variables. In addition, forecasts are overly anchored to prior beliefs for all variables at all forecast horizons. We show analytically that overconfidence in private information qualitatively generates both of these features. It also implies that forecast errors correlate positively with past forecast revisions at the consensus level, but negatively at the individual level, as documented previously in the literature. Estimating Bayesian updating models on SPF data, we show that overconfidence in private information also replicates the observed patterns quantitatively. All estimated models display strong and statistically significant overconfidence in private information.Read moreCiteListenSave
Research Article210.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103812What’s driving the decline in entrepreneurship?Sep 01, 2025Journal of Monetary EconomicsNicholas KozeniauskasCiteListenSave
Research Article10.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103842“Information frictions in macroeconomics: The legacy of Robert E. Lucas, Jr.”Sep 01, 2025Journal of Monetary EconomicsRobert M TownsendCiteListenSave
Research Article110.1016/j.jmoneco.2025.103808Tokenomics: Optimal monetary and fee policiesJul 01, 2025Journal of Monetary EconomicsUrban Jermann + 1 more +1We document properties of crypto monetary policies based on a large sample of tokens. We present a dynamic model to determine the optimal issuance and fee policies for issuers. Committing to low future money growth and fees increases profits, and the degree of commitment matters for equilibrium existence. A Ramsey issuer who maximizes profits, after the initial period, makes choices that maximize the utility value of all tokens. We present a model with probabilistic commitment, solve for the steady state in closed form, and show that empirically relevant long-run money growth rates align with very high levels of commitment. • Average money growth rates decline with age and stabilize at about 0.25% per month. • We derive optimal monetary issuance and fees for a crypto issuer. • Commitment significantly influences optimal policies and achievable market capitalization. • Empirically relevant money growth rates align with very high issuer commitment.Read moreCiteListenSave