Owen Edwards. 2021. Rote-Meto Comparative Dictionary. Asia Pacific Linguistics. Canberra: ANU Press. xii + 452 pp. ISBN 9781760464561. AUD$75, softcover. Open access: http://doi.org/10.22459/RMCD.2021.
1 Book Review 2 3 Owen Edwards. 2021. Rote-Meto Comparative Dictionary. Asia4 Pacific Linguistics. Canberra: ANU Press. xii + 452 pp. ISBN 5 9781760464561. AUD$75, softcover. Open access: http://doi. 6 org/10.22459/RMCD.2021. 7 1. Introduction.1 Edwards’ Rote-Meto Comparative Dictionary (RMCD) is 8 easily the most important comparative and historical work on Timor-Rote lan9 guages to appear since Jonker (1908). In fact, given the significant amount of 10 additional data from within the severely underdocumented region of Linguistic 11 Wallacea from both published and unpublished sources, rigorous comparisons, 12 1174 reconstructions, (with an additional 83 entries for loan distributions, 13 making 1257 entries altogether), and the accessible organization of the data 14 (including in two electronic versions), the RMCD has to be said to supersede 15 Jonker’s work. The RMCD is meticulous in its detail, impressive in the amount 16 of data laid out and the sheer volume of material that Edwards controls, and 17 transparent in providing data that do not cleanly fit the expected patterns while 18 also attempting to account for irregularities in the sound correspondences. The 19 PDF is available for free download at http://doi.org/10.22459/RMCD.2021. 20 The work is also available in ePub format. A hardcopy currently lists for 21 AUD$75.00. 22 The purpose of RMCD is to provide “an initial bottom-up reconstruction 23 of one low-level Austronesian subgroup of the linguistic area of Wallacea: the 24 Rote-Meto subgroup” (p. 1). The reconstructions are of Proto-Rote–Meto 25 (PRM) “or one of its lower branches,” which have been identified in Edwards 26 (2016, 2018a,b) and refined in chapter 3 of the RMCD. Also of significance 27 are the many “out-comparisons” scattered throughout the work, showing “puta28 tive cognates” in other Austronesian or non-Austronesian languages (explained 29 on pp. 17–18). The RMCD is data-rich—Edwards provides data from twenty30 nine Rote and Meto lects, and from forty-five additional languages that are cited 31 in four or more out-comparisons. 32 Chapter 1 explains the data sources, transcription issues, and the structure of 33 the dictionary necessary to find things and understand the various notational 1. For full disclosure, Edwards consulted with me before beginning his RMCD about how to set up the information structure in a TOOLBOX computer database for linguistic comparisons across many speech varieties, tracking glosses, and sources, for ultimately producing both a formatted print version and an interactive electronic version. He also used a number of data sources from me. But I did not see the electronic RMCD until after it had been accepted for publication and that without the introductory chapters. What Edwards did with my early suggestions far exceeded my expectations. I have worked to varying degrees with five different Rote languages and five different Meto languages, and so am probably more familiar with the material than most readers might be. Oceanic Linguistics, Volume 61, no. 2 (December 2022)© by University of Hawai‘i Press. All rights reserved. 34 conventions. Chapter 2 provides the most succinct overview of Rote and Meto 35 phonology and morphology available to date, and is necessary to understand the 36 RMCD, “as many forms included in this dictionary are only attested in morpho37 logically complex forms with no putative mono-morphemic root attested” (p. 38 40). With numerous morphophonemic processes in effect, that is a particularly 39 complex task for Meto languages, and Edwards has done an admirable job of 40 laying out the key issues. Chapter 3 provides the historical background, including 41 sound correspondences and internal subgrouping, to a large part a summary with 42 minor revisions of Edwards (2016, 2018a,b). One welcome feature in the discus43 sion of sets of sound correspondences is the inclusion of the number of attesta44 tions of each correspondence set or regular split. Chapter 3 also explores the 45 position of Rote–Meto within Timor–Babar, and provides the most thorough 46 exploration of this higher level subgroup to date, based on the historical phonol47 ogy. For the purposes of this RMCD, Edwards is “agnostic” about the validity of 48 Central-Eastern...
Read more