The article is devoted to study of the patterns of development of potential for the reproduction of the population of Russian regions, considering the socio-economic situation in them. The purpose of the work is to identify the factors of socio-economic development of Russian regions that have the greatest impact on the level of population reproduction and to analyze the sensitivity of this characteristic to changes in the state of socio-economic situation in Russian regions. To achieve this goal, the key characteristics of the population reproduction potential were analyzed the marginal rate of population reproduction and standardized birth rates for five-year age groups of mothers for the period from 1990 to 2020.The results presented in the article were obtained in the course of studying the dynamics of population reproduction and interdependencies with the main socio-economic indicators of the regions, assessed by the methods of correlation analysis and machine learning, on the results of testing of which the most informative factors were identified that have a significant impact on the process of reproduction of the country and its regions with the account of the age structure of mothers. In particular, it was found that with an increase in the age of mother, the influence of factors characterizing economic well-being increases when deciding to have a child, while in younger age groups the indicators of social well-being become more important. On the basis of these models, estimates of the sensitivity of indicators of population reproduction and birth rates in each of the studied age groups of mothers were obtained in case of changes in the socio-economic factors. Based on the analysis, there were drawn conclusions about the impact of the socio-economic situation in the country and regions on the birth rates in different age groups of mothers, as well as on the reproductive potential in general.

One of the characteristics of labor potential is the ability to work among its carriers indiv i duals, groups and the population, by which are also studied other characteristics (demography, health, social and economic activity, professional competencies, etc.). On the basis of working capacity is determined the most general indicator of the labor potential of population, namely, labor resources. This indicator is structured according to a number of qualitative parameters. They make it possible to identify labor resources used in public production, as well as unused reserves. Their involvement in labor is becoming relevant in the context of the modern need to increase the self-sufficiency of the economy, and hence, to increase these resources. However, their growth is limited for demographic reasons. To assess the available reserves, labor resources are ranked according to the characteristics of economic activity. In descending order, the categories are distinguished according to their relation to the labor force: the real labor force (employed and unemployed), potential labor force (not employed, but willing to work) and not included in the labor force (not willing to work). Calculations for these categories showed that in 2021, the real labor force dominated in the labor force (85.6%). The potential contingent accounted for a miserable amount (slightly more than one percent), and for those who did not want to work — a little more than 10%. But among those not included in the labor force, more than two thirds of this category were those who had objective reasons for being unemployed, as well as those employed in unpaid but useful domestic work. Factors influencing the structure of labor resources are considered by regions of the Russian Federation. They showed dependence of this structure on the birth rate, aging of the population, internal migration, and, above all, on the parameters of employment and unemployment, which play a leading role among the factors for improving this structure.

Le dénombrement de la population, dénominateur de nombreux indicateurs statistiques, est crucial pour les politiques publiques d’un pays. Il est du ressort des instituts nationaux de statistique d’en organiser la collecte, le plus souvent par le biais d’un recensement. Que se passe-t-il lorsqu’une partie du territoire n’est pas accessible aux agents recenseurs ? Actuellement, les données spatiales, telles qu’extraites de l’imagerie satellite, offrent une information géographique complète et de haute résolution, qui représente, lorsque combinée à un dénombrement partiel de la population, une opportunité sans précédent pour estimer les effectifs des territoires manquants. Leur précision spatiale rend également possible une estimation carroyée de la population en haute résolution, un format de données innovant à la croisée de la géographie et de la démographie. À partir du cas du Burkina Faso, cet article analyse comment le découpage du pays en carreaux de 100m sur 100m permet dans un premier temps de développer un modèle pour estimer, par le biais d’une approche hiérarchique bayésienne, la population des zones caractérisées par des problèmes sécuritaires n’ayant pas pu être dénombrées lors du dernier recensement de 2019. Ce découpage permet dans un second temps de désagréger les effectifs obtenus, par le biais d’un modèle d’apprentissage statistique pour obtenir une précision spatiale d’estimation de la population inégalée.

International audience

niveau recherche, publiés ou non, émanant des établissements d'enseignement et de recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires publics ou privés.

The transition to a market economy implied the creation of opportunities for individuals to realize entrepreneurial talent. Over the past thirty years, the interest of young people in doing business has noticeably decreased. At the same time, in the conditions of the labor market compression caused by the crisis, increasing competition for available vacancies, the idea of starting own business may be attractive. The article is based on the results of a large-scale sociological study, which included a mass survey of students of the Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, a series of semi-structured interviews with experts and focus group interviews with students. It shows how students feel about entrepreneurship, how right they are, according to experts, in their expectations, and how the discovered ideas and attitudes can affect the development of the economy. According to the survey results, a third of students think about their own business as a way to achieve financial well-being. Young people mostly do not see their relatives and friends as their business partners, since they prefer to conduct business on a formal basis, which they see as a certain guarantee against unfair actions of partners. At the same time, the results suggest that the protection of private property and, first of all, business, is clearly insufficient for young people. This corresponds to their ideas about the disinterest of key economic actors in fair market competition, demonopolization of the economy, reduction of corruption in the public administration system, judicial and law enforcement agencies. Experts express skepticism about the possibility of the majority of young people to open and keep afloat their business, and attribute this to a shortage of material and educational resources, and most importantly — of the social capital that corresponds to the specifics of the current economic system.

Based on the data of the Russian Longitudinal Monitoring Survey of the Higher School of Economics, the main factors characterizing health in dynamics on the basis of respondents' self-assessments from 1994 to 2020 are considered. According to the 2020 data, no significant changes in health have been revealed, that might allow us to talk about an obvious impact of the pandemic. About a half of men and a third of women considered themselves healthy, 45.8% of men and 52.0% of women define their health as average. The negative assessments by residents of various settlements have almost become equal, and by 2020, urban residents have already assessed their health as worse than residents of villages. Villagers are half as likely to rate their health as poor. The main factors that can make a negative contribution to the pandemic situation have been identified: (1) 8.5% of men and 13.2% of women consider their health to be bad and very bad; during the past 30 days in 2020, a fifth of men and a third of women had health problems; (2) 22.6% are not satisfied with their lives in general, the well-being of men and women practically does not differ; (3) 56.3% are not satisfied with their financial situation; 29.7% reported that their financial situation has worsened; (4) 6.7% are not satisfied with their work; (5) 16.6% do not see prospects and believe that they will live worse in the near future; (6) 63.4% of people are very worried or a little worried about the threat of losing their job; (7) 77.4% lead a passive lifestyle, do not exercise; (8) 43.9% of men and 13.1% of women smoke.

The article is devoted to the contribution of the great Russian scholar economist N. M. Rimashevskaya to development of gender economic studies in the USSR and in Russia. N. M. Rimashevskaya found a scientific school of gender studies in the USSR, then developed it in Russia, amid the changing economic and socio-political order. The authors consider the scientific and socio-political path of N. M. Rimashevskaya and the directions of her work in the field of gender economic studies in the Soviet, transitional periods and in the new Millennium. The article shows the role of N. M. Rimashevskaya in institutionalization of gender studies in the USSR and Russia, in particular, in creation of the Moscow Center for Gender Studies, academic journal "Population", in conducting the Taganrog project, which is unique in terms of duration and its socio-economic and gender analysis' depth. Ahead of the spread of the gender agenda among international organizations such as the UN, as early as in the 1960s and 1970s, N. M. Rimashevskaya conducted gender comparison of the daily time-use and its distribution to paid and unpaid work based on the data collected in Taganrog, predetermining one of the most relevant areas for development of gender economic analysis and gender budgeting, as well as economic analysis in general. The article also pays attention to the research and development of strategic concepts concerning the country's socio-economic policy and the programs carried out by the Moscow Center for Gender Studies. The impact of the scientific school of gender studies in Moscow on the formation and institutionalization of women's social and political movements in the newly formed democracy in the early 1990s also deserves a special attention. And finally, the key areas of economic research on gender inequality conducted under the leadership of N. M. Rimashevskaya are structured and described. Keywords: gender inequality, gender economic studies, N. M. Rimashevskaya, Moscow school of gender studies, gender economic theory.