- Research Article
- 10.1080/02665433.2025.2553274
Ambivalent republican and Roman models for Washington D.C.
- Sep 12, 2025
- Planning Perspectives
- Samuli Simelius
ABSTRACT Although Washington D.C. is one of the best known capitals of democracies in the world, this article demonstrates that the representation of republican and democratic values in its architectural and city planning were largely dismissed in its earliest design phase, whereas ancient Roman – usually Imperial – examples were valued instead. The discussion focuses on two aspects: the grandeur of the space and the initial absence of a location for the Supreme Court. The planning process is mainly reconstructed through letters and visual representations describing the earliest plans, focusing on the main characters in the process: Pierre L’Enfant and Thomas Jefferson. L’Enfant is often seen to be advocating for designs based on authoritarian examples, whereas Jefferson is seen to be a flag-bearer for designs that represent more republican values. The article demonstrates, however, that neither man actually considered republican elements to be important for the city-planning or architecture of the new capital; instead, ancient Rome can be seen as a model behind the plan, as Rome ambiguously suggested both Imperial grandeur and republicanism.
Read more