Rhodoliths composed of crustose coralline algae (CCA) are marine calcifiers of global significance. Here, we investigate how floridean starch storage patterns of Arctic rhodoliths from Svalbard are affected by environmental conditions. Quantifying the amount of starch in photomosaic scans of rhodolith slabs via amylopectin–iodine complex formation, we found that shallow water rhodoliths contain significantly higher starch percentages compared to the deeper-water dwellers. We conclude that the observed starch patterns are mainly controlled by water depth because light and rhodolith turnover frequency both decrease in deeper waters. Regarding rhodolith turnover, the occasional burial of turned rhodoliths in deeper waters can result in a dieback of the outer CCA thallus areas, which contain important starch supplies. As rhodoliths are both calcifiers and photoautotrophs, we highlight their relevance in potentially contributing to global blue carbon, that is, their role as a marine carbon sink. In this context, our quantification approach of floridean starch patterns in rhodoliths provides a straightforward basis for further studies on this topic.

Western countries responded to the full-scale Russian attack on Ukraine on 24 February 2022 by imposing strong sanctions to isolate Russia. Norway has adhered to this policy, with exceptions for cooperation on border control, search and rescue, and fisheries research and management in the Barents Sea. Bilateral cooperation within polar science is on ice but has not broken off completely as some scientist-to-scientist contact has been maintained. This Perspective article outlines how these sanctions have greatly reduced cooperation between Norwegian research entities (especially the Institute of Marine Research and the Norwegian Polar Institute) and Russian institutes and scientists in various fields of marine and polar science. Some scientist-to-scientist contact remains, but the nature of these communications has become scantier during the course of the last three years. Maintaining some form of contact is vital for the sustainable management of the living marine resources that Russia and Norway share.

Garbage may cause substantial environmental perturbations, in part because of its consumption by wildlife. Such consumption may have direct health implications for animals and may also influence trophic relationships. Even in pristine Arctic ecosystems, wildlife feeding in marine environments consume garbage in the form of plastic debris transported by ocean currents. We show that Arctic wildlife in pristine terrestrial environments may also ingest garbage or food items derived from abandoned camp sites. We found the remains of a chocolate wrapper and a milk powder bag in two Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) scats and a piece of cloth in an Arctic wolf (Canis lupus arctos) scat collected near Nares Strait, northern Greenland, one of the most pristine terrestrial wilderness regions on Earth. Found on Washington Land and associated with long-abandoned camp sites, these three scats were among 657 Arctic fox scats and 92 wolf scats collected as part of a larger study. Our study demonstrates that these two highly opportunistic predators managed to consume garbage despite the almost complete lack of human activity in this High-Arctic region. Our results highlight that abandoned anthropogenic material in the High Arctic may function as a source of garbage for local terrestrial wildlife over extended time periods, and that garbage consumption may become a potential issue if human activity in remote Arctic regions increases.

Rapid Arctic warming and sea ice loss have led to an intensification of the Arctic hydrological cycle, which is characterized by increased local evaporation and precipitation. Stable water isotopes as environmental tracers can provide useful insights into the Arctic hydrological cycle. However, the paucity of isotopic observations in the Arctic has limited our understanding of the hydrological changes. Here, we use an isotope-enabled atmospheric general circulation model (IsoGSM) combined with the Global Network of Isotopes in Precipitation (GNIP) observations to investigate the relationship between sea ice changes and Arctic precipitation d18O (d18Op), and reveal the relative influence of local air temperature and evaporation on Arctic summer and winter d18Op. We find that the Arctic d18Op is negatively correlated with sea ice concentration, but positively with air temperature. Sea ice loss leads to enriched Arctic d18Op through enhanced local evaporation and warming, but the relative importance of these processes varies between seasons. During summer, both local evaporation and warming contribute equally to d18Op changes. In contrast, winter δ18O is predominantly driven by air temperature. This work improves our understanding of how Arctic precipitation isotopes respond to sea ice changes and has implications for the Arctic hydrological cycle and paleotemperature reconstructions.

To determine the present-day community composition of siliceous Rhizaria (Radiolaria and Phaeodaria) in Norwegian fjords, plankton tows were conducted in south-western and northern Norwegian fjords in September 2016. The mean total abundance of radiolarians was 306 m–3 in the Sognefjord complex, which was the southern research site, and, in the north, 945 m–3 in Malangen and 89 m–3 in Balsfjord, both above the Arctic Circle. Sticholonche zanclea was the most abundant radiolarian in the Sognefjord complex and Malangen, accounting for 78–100% (mean 89%) of radiolarian abundance. The mean total abundance of phaeodarians was 1554 m–3 in the Sognefjord complex, 51 m–3 in Malangen and 11 m–3 in Balsfjord. Medusetta arcifera was the most abundant phaeodaria in the Sognefjord complex, accounting for >99% of phaeodarian abundance, but was absent in Malangen and Balsfjord, where Protocystis tridens accounted for >96% of phaeodarian abundance. The carbon biomass of S. zanclea and M. arcifera was 188 and 438 µg C m–3, respectively, which is similar to and 8.6 times higher than, respectively, that of phaeodarians >1 mm in the western North Pacific, suggesting that M. arcifera contributes to organic carbon transport in the Sognefjord complex. Amphimelissa setosa (Nassellaria, Radiolaria), which was a dominant species in the study area in 1982–83, was absent in the present study in all sampled fjords. This could have been caused by the approximately 2 °C increase in water temperature that has occurred since 1990 and can be taken as evidence of a climate-change-associated local temperature rise linked to the warming of advected Atlantic Water.

Bowhead whales (Baleana mysticetus) are usually away from west Greenland waters during summer. Reported here is an observation of at least six bowhead whales in July 2022 in the Uummannaq Fjord system of west Greenland.

The aim of the second Scientific Expedition Edgeøya Spitsbergen (SEES), which took place from 13 to 22 July 2022, was to study the consequences of climate warming in the High Arctic, building on ecological data gathered by the Dutch Arctic Station on Edgeøya between 1968 and 1987 and the first SEES expedition in 2015. In this Perspective essay, I ponder the actual purpose of SEES 2022, in which I participated as an early-career research scientist. The research activities were very limited and climate change was named as the restricting factor. Fifty researchers were accompanied by 50 tourists, journalists and policymakers. The choice made by the expedition leaders and funders to go for a tourist vessel was mostly financial, and the difference in media output versus expected research output substantial, which points to paradoxes related to research, publicity, politics and tourism in the Arctic.

Many areas in the Arctic are vulnerable to the impacts of climate change. We observe large-scale effects on physical, biological, economic and social parameters, including ice cover, species distributions, economic activity and regional governance frameworks. Arctic living marine resources are affected in various ways. A holistic understanding of these effects requires a multidisciplinary enterprise. We synthesize relevant research, from oceanography and ecology, via economics, to political science and international law. We find that multidisciplinary research can enhance our understanding and promote new questions and issues relating to impacts and outcomes of climate change in the Arctic. Such issues include recent insights on changing spawning migrations of the North-east Arctic cod stock that necessitates revisions of socioeconomic estimates of ecosystem wealth in the Barents Sea, better integrated prediction systems that require increased cooperation between experts on climate prediction and ecosystem modelling, and institutional complexities of Arctic governance that require enhanced coordination.

Journals dedicated to the polar sciences have been outliers. Within both the history of science and the history of media, they stand out in several ways, including their comparatively late establishment of peer-review. It was not until the second half of the 20th century, that polar sciences journals began to carry predominantly peer-reviewed original research rather than synopses of research published elsewhere. This Perspective piece uses the 40th anniversary of Polar Research as an opportunity to look at the past of polar sciences periodicals—and invites reflection on their future.