Research Article610.1016/j.soisec.2024.100170Medium-term economic impacts of cover crop adoption in MarylandSep 28, 2024Soil SecurityYifei Zhang + 10 more +10CiteListenSave
Research Article210.1016/j.soisec.2024.100166Short building blocks to devise adaptable soil definitionsAug 10, 2024Soil SecurityAnne C Richer-De-Forges + 2 more +2CiteListenSave
Research Article210.1016/j.soisec.2024.100163Identification of high-performing soil groups in grazing lands using a multivariate analysis methodAug 03, 2024Soil SecurityI.p Senanayake + 4 more +4Understanding and quantifying the complex relationships between soil properties and vegetation health is important for sustainable land management and optimising agricultural productivity. This study tested a spatial data-driven framework to identify the soil groups associated with pasture health using publicly available gridded soil attribute layers from Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (SLGA) over two adjacent southeast Australian river catchments. Principal component analysis (PCA) followed by isocluster unsupervised classification was applied to seventeen SLGA soil attribute layers to identify dominant soil patterns, which showed good spatial agreement with the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) data derived from Landsat-8 imagery. The soil class demonstrating the highest EVI values (HVR class) and the lowest EVI values (LVR class) were determined. A comparison of these classes with soil types defined in the New South Wales Soil Landscape maps confirmed that the HVR class is predominated by agriculturally productive, basalt-derived 'Ant Hill' soils. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) ranging from ∼10 to 20 meq/100 g, clay content ranging from 20 % to 30 %, pHc (pH in calcium chloride solution) between 5 and 6, pHw (pH in water) between 5.5 and 6.5 and SOC between 2.5 % to 4 % were associated with higher EVI values in the HVR soil class within the study area. This study demonstrated an effective framework for identifying key soil attributes that affect agricultural productivity and pinpointing critical locations for grazing land productivity.Read moreCiteListenSave
Research Article410.1016/j.soisec.2024.100156Soil footprint: A simple indicator to communicate and quantify soil securityJul 08, 2024Soil SecurityV García-Gamero + 2 more +2CiteListenSave
Research Article1010.1016/j.soisec.2024.100153Soil carbon tonne-year accounting: Crediting the additional time-integrated amount of carbon captured in soilJun 01, 2024Soil SecurityBudiman Minasny + 1 more +1CiteListenSave
Research Article210.1016/j.soisec.2024.100145Subsetting reduces the error of MIR spectroscopy models for soil organic carbon prediction in the U.S. Great PlainsMay 13, 2024Soil SecurityMinerva J Dorantes + 2 more +2CiteListenSave
Research Article410.1016/j.soisec.2024.100140Keystone rhizospheric diazotrophs may promote the pioneer plant growth in mine tailingsApr 03, 2024Soil SecurityYongbin Li + 9 more +9CiteListenSave
Research Article210.1016/j.soisec.2024.100131Institutional arrangements to decarbonise rural land in AustraliaJan 23, 2024Soil SecurityIan HannamCiteListenSave
Research Article710.1016/j.soisec.2023.100121Ethnopedology, its evolution and perspectives in soil security: A reviewNov 22, 2023Soil SecurityGeorgina Pérez-Rodríguez + 2 more +2CiteListenSave
Research Article2910.1016/j.soisec.2023.100119Importance of soil fertility for climate-resilient cropping systems: The farmer's perspectiveNov 08, 2023Soil SecurityMelanie Katrin Wolf + 2 more +2CiteListenSave