Background: Internet medical services (IMS) have been rapidly promoted across China, especially since the outbreak of COVID-19. However, a nationwide study is still lacking. Objective: To unveil the whole picture of IMS across tertiary and secondary hospitals in China, and to evaluate potential influence of the hospital general characteristics, medical staff reserve, and patient visiting capacity on IMS provision. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted, and 1,995 tertiary and 2,824 secondary hospitals completed questionnaires from 31 administrative regions in China during July 1 and October 31, 2021. Those hospitals are defined having abilities of providing IMS if at least one following service are available: (1) online appointment of diagnoses and treatments; (2) online disease consultation; (3) electronic prescription; and (4) drug delivery. The logistic regression models are used to detect the possible roles on developing IMS. Results: A majority (68.9%) of tertiary hospitals and 53.0% secondary hospitals have provided IMS (p < 0.01). Tertiary hospital also had much higher proportions than secondary hospitals in online appointment of diagnoses and treatments (62.6% vs. 46.1%), online disease consultation (47.3% vs. 16.9%), electronic prescription (33.2% vs. 9.6%), and drug delivery (27.8% vs. 4.6%). In multivariate model, IMS hospitals may be associated significantly with having more licensed doctors (≥161 vs. <161: odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 1.13-1.50; p < 0.01), having more frequency of registration appointments (≥3,356 vs. <3,356: OR, 1.77; 1.54-2.03; p < 0.01), having higher frequency of patient follow-ups (≥1,160 vs. <1,160: OR, 1.36; 1.15-1.61; p < 0.01), having laboratory test appointments (Yes vs. No: OR, 1.25; 1.06-1.48; p = 0.01), and having treatment appointments (Yes vs. No: OR, 1.27; 1.11-1.46; p < 0.01) in the past 3 months. Conclusions: The coverage of IMS is appreciable in China, but the IMS market is still greatly extended and improved. The provision of IMS depends primarily on the scales of the hospitals, including medical staff reserve and patient visiting capacity.

Introduction: The objective of this study was to understand whether use of audio-only telemedicine visits differed by individual- and neighborhood-level patient characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of telemedicine encounter data from a large academic health system. The primary outcome was rate of audio-only versus video visits. The exposures of interest were individual- (age, race, insurance, preferred language) and neighborhood-level (Social Deprivation Index [SDI]) patient characteristics. Results: Our study included 1,054,465 patient encounters from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021, of which 18.33% were completed via audio-only. Encounters among adults 75 years or older, Black patients, Spanish-speakers, and those with public insurance were more frequently conducted by audio-only (p < 0.001). Overall, populations showed decreasing rates of audio-only visits over time. We also observed an increase in the rate of audio-only encounters as SDI scores increased. Discussion: We found that audio-only disparities exist in telemedicine utilization by individual and zip code level characteristics. Though these disparities have improved over time as seen by our temporal analysis, marginalized and minority groups still showed the lowest rates of video utilization. In conclusion, access to audio-only care is a critical component to ensure that telemedicine is accessible to all populations. State and federal policy should support continued reimbursement of audio-only care to ensure equitable access to care while the implications of different care modalities are further studied.

Introduction: Nurses have proven to be fundamental for the expansion and consolidation of primary health care (PHC), as well as the development of digital health strategies. We explored the results of a synchronous telephone teleconsultations service between professionals for nurses in Brazil. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study. We retrieved data from teleconsultations registry. All teleconsultations answered by the team of nurses between September 2018 and July 2021 were analyzed regarding the reasons (according to International Classification of Primary Care, 2nd edition-ICPC-2) and decisions of the teleconsultation. Results: There were 9,273 phone teleconsultations registered in the period, requested by 3,125 nurses from all states throughout the country, of which 56.9% called once and 15.9% used the teleconsultations at least 4 times. We found 362 different reasons for solicitations, which were classified according to the ICPC-2 chapters. The most frequent codes were respiratory (25.9%), general and unspecified (21.2%), and skin (21.2%), which corresponded to 68% of the total sample. Most teleconsultations (66.9%) had as outcome the maintenance of the case at PHC. Conclusion: Teleconsultations are widely used and address a broad number of situations. This service may improve the quality of Brazilian PHC and promote the development of clinical reasoning and critical thinking by nurses.

Background: Even before coronavirus disease 2019, integrating telemedicine into routine health care has become increasingly attractive. Evidence regarding the benefits of telemedicine in prenatal care is still inconclusive. As one of the largest sectors of preventive medicine with a relative paucity of specialists in maternal-fetal medicine (MFM), the implementation of telemedicine solutions into prenatal care is promising. Our objective aimed at establishing a telemedicine network of specialists in MFM for interprofessional exchange regarding high-risk pregnancies. Furthermore, the aims were to evaluate the providers' attitude toward the telemedicine solutions and to quantify the number of inpatient appointments that were avoided through interprofessional video consultations. Methods: This prospective trial was part of a larger telemedicine project funded by the European Regional Development Fund. MFM experts were brought together using the ELVI software. A questionnaire was designed for the evaluation of video consultations. The responses were analyzed by the exact McNemar-Bowker test to compare planned procedures before and after video consultation. Results: An interprofessional network of specialists in prenatal ultrasound was established with a total of 140 evaluations for statistical analysis. Interprofessional video communication was viewed favorably by providers. Overall, 47% (33/70) of the scheduled visits were avoided after video consultation. The providers' tendency to refrain from sending their patients to the University Hospital Münster was statistically noticeable (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Interprofessional exchange through video consultation holds great potential in the context of prenatal care. More prospective research is needed to clearly establish the most beneficial standard of care for both patients and providers. Clinical trial registration number: 2019-683-f-S.

Background: Virtual consultation has been one of the most prevalent direct-to-consumer telemedicine services in China. However, little is known about patients' virtual consultation use of different sponsorship types of telemedicine platforms. This study aimed to examine Chinese patients' virtual consultation use and identify the factors that affect consultation use of different sponsorship types of platforms. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey on 1,653 participants in tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3 hospitals in 3 cities with different income levels, in Zhejiang Province, in May and June 2019. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors that affect patients' virtual consultation use of different sponsorship types of platforms. Results: The most frequently used consultation platform was digital health company-sponsored platforms (36.60%), hospital-sponsored platforms (34.57%), doctors' personal social media (11.09%), other company-sponsored platforms (9.24%), and medical e-commerce company-sponsored platforms (8.50%). The patients' virtual consultation use of different sponsorship types of platforms was determined by education levels, monthly income levels, perceived health status, internet use, and city income levels. Conclusions: Chinese patients' virtual consultation service use varied by platform sponsorship type. Digital health company-sponsored platforms owned advantages over other platform types in high-end consumers with higher education levels, higher income levels, living in high-income cities, and active in internet use. This study implied that different sponsorship types of direct-to-consumer telemedicine platforms in China differ from each other in online health care resource allocation, business model, and competitive advantage.

Background: Adults with chronic medical conditions complicated by food insecurity or physical limitations may have higher barriers to accessing telehealth implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. Objective: To examine the relationships of self-reported food insecurity and physical limitations with changes in health care utilization and medication adherence comparing the year before (March 2019-February 2020) and the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020-March 2021) among patients with chronic conditions insured by Medicaid or Medicare Advantage. Methods: A prospective cohort study of 10,452 Kaiser Permanente Northern California members insured by Medicaid and 52,890 Kaiser Permanente Colorado members insured by Medicare Advantage was conducted. Difference-in-differences (DID) between the pre-COVID and COVID years in telehealth versus in-person health care utilization and adherence to chronic disease medicines by food insecurity and by physical limitation status were measured. Results: Food insecurity and physical limitations were each associated with small but significantly greater shifts from in-person to telehealth. Medicare Advantage members with physical limitations also had significantly greater decline in adherence to chronic medications from year to year compared with those without physical limitations (DID from pre-COVID year to COVID year ranged from 0.7% to 3.6% greater decline by medication class, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Food insecurity and physical limitations did not present significant barriers to the transition to telehealth during the COVID pandemic. The greater decrease in medication adherence among older patients with physical limitations suggests that care systems must further address the needs of this high-risk population.

Introduction: The Society of Critical Care Medicine Tele-Critical Care (TCC) Committee has identified the need for rigorous comparative research of different TCC delivery models to support the development of best practices for staffing, application, and approaches to workflow. Our objective was to describe and compare outcomes between two TCC delivery models, TCC with 24/7 Bedside Intensivist (BI) compared with TCC with Private Daytime Attending Intensivist (PI) in relation to intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital mortality, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), cost, and complications across the spectrum of routine ICU standards of care. Methods: Observational cohort study at large health care system in 12 ICUs and included patients, ≥18, with Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IVa scores and predictions (October 2016-June 2019). Results: Of the 19,519 ICU patients, 71.7% (n = 13,993) received TCC with 24/7 BI while 28.3% (n = 5,526) received TCC with PI. ICU and Hospital mortality (4.8% vs. 3.1%, p < 0.0001; 12.6% vs. 8.1%, p < 0.001); and ICU and Hospital LOS (3.2 vs. 2.4 days, p < 0.001; 9.8 vs. 7.2 days, p < 0.001) were significantly higher among 24/7 BI compared with PI. The APACHE observed/expected ratios (odds ratio [OR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]) for ICU mortality (0.62; 0.58-0.67) vs. (0.53; 0.46-0.61) and Hospital mortality (0.95; 0.57-1.48) vs. (0.77; 0.70-0.84) were significantly different for 24/7 BI compared with PI. Multivariate mixed models that adjusted for confounders demonstrated significantly greater odds of (OR; 95% CI) ICU mortality (1.58; 1.28-1.93), Hospital mortality (1.52; 1.33-1.73), complications (1.55; 1.18-2.04), ICU LOS [3.14 vs. 2.59 (1.25; 1.19-1.51)], and Hospital LOS [9.05 vs. 7.31 (1.23; 1.21-1.25)] among 24/7 BI when compared with PI. Sensitivity analyses adjusting for ICU admission within 24 h of hospital admission, receiving active ICU treatments, nighttime admission, sepsis, and highest third acute physiology score indicated significantly higher odds for 24/7 BI compared with PI. Conclusion: Our comparison demonstrated that TCC delivery model with PI provided high-quality care with significant positive effects on outcomes. This suggests that TCC delivery models have broad-ranging applicability and benefits in routine critical care, thus necessitating progressive research in this direction.