Under the dual pressures of global climate change and accelerating urbanization, landscape design has been tasked with the critical mission of enhancing urban environmental resilience and ecological livability. However, conventional design practices often struggle to efficiently integrate complex sustainability norms with aesthetic creativity, leading to a disconnect between form and function. To address this issue, this study proposes and validates an AI-enabled sustainability decision-support framework. The framework is based on a “Generative-Critical” multi-agent workflow that enables “Self-Correcting” iterative optimization of design schemes through a built-in expert knowledge base and a quantitative scorecard. The framework’s effectiveness was validated through a cultural park case study and a blind evaluation by 10 experts. It guided a design from an initial concept with only aesthetic forms and lacking effective stormwater management, to an ecologically integrated scheme that strategically incorporated bioretention ponds at key nodes and converted hard plazas into permeable pavements. This transformation significantly elevated the scheme’s sustainability score from 59.3 to 88.0 (p < 0.001), while the framework itself achieved a high system usability scale (SUS) score of 85.5. These results confirm that the proposed “Generative-Critical” mechanism can effectively guide AIGC to adhere to ecological-technical norms and constraints while pursuing aesthetic innovation, thereby achieving a scientific integration of aesthetic form and ecological function at the early conceptual design stage. This study offers a scalable methodology for AI-assisted sustainable design and provides a novel intelligent tool for creating resilient urban landscapes that possess both environmental performance and aesthetic value.

Universal accessibility remains a critical challenge for effective public transport and urban equity. This study addresses the need for operational prioritisation tools by proposing a robust hybrid methodology to rank interventions at urban mobility nodes. The approach combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for integrating expert and participatory criteria weighting with four Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) techniques (TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and ARAS) to ensure solution reliability. Empirical validation, conducted on 30 bus stops in Segovia, Spain, confirmed the methodological soundness, evidenced by near-perfect correlations (ρ = 0.99) among the compromise and additive ratio models (TOPSIS–VIKOR and COPRAS–ARAS) and stability across over 85% of sensitivity simulations. The findings validate that the methodology effectively guides resource allocation towards interventions yielding maximum social impact and demonstrate its transferability to complex urban supply chain contexts, such as logistics microhubs. Ultimately, this replicable and adaptable model supports the transition towards more equitable, resilient urban systems, aligning directly with Sustainable Development Goal 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities).

Mozambique’s rapidly urbanizing landscape presents both opportunities and challenges for achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 7 and 11, which aim to ensure access to clean energy and sustainable cities. This study employs the HESPECT analytical framework—emphasizing Historical, Economic, Social, Political, Ecological, Cultural, and Technological dimensions of the energy context—to examine the factors shaping renewable energy transitions in Mozambican cities. The analysis reveals a dual dynamic: facilitating factors such as abundant solar and wind potential, expanding urban energy demand, and growing policy support; and inhibiting factors including deforestation-driven ecological stress, poverty, infrastructural deficits, and uneven access to technology and education. By linking renewable energy development to urban planning, service delivery, and social inclusion, the study underscores how energy systems shape the sustainability and livability of Mozambique’s cities. The paper concludes that advancing Mozambique’s renewable energy agenda requires targeted interventions to mitigate constraints while leveraging enabling factors to strengthen institutional capacity, enhance social inclusion, and accelerate progress toward guaranteeing clean and affordable energy to all (SDG 7) and livable, sustainable cities (SDG 11).

This study examines the relationship between lung and bronchus cancer mortality, vertical urban density, and smoking prevalence across 48 U.S. states from 1999 to 2022. Using 2034 state-year observations, skyscraper counts are employed as a proxy for vertical urban density, together with sex-specific, age-adjusted mortality and smoking data. A fully interacted empirical model identifies a non-linear, inverted U-shaped relationship between vertical density and lung cancer mortality for both men and women: mortality initially increases with greater vertical density but declines at higher levels, consistent with offsetting effects of environmental exposure and improved access to healthcare in highly dense urban environments. Importantly, the shape and magnitude of this relationship differ by gender. While smoking prevalence is strongly associated with lung cancer mortality for both sexes, mortality rates are consistently higher among males, and the marginal effect of smoking on mortality is more pronounced for men than for women. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for both non-linearity and gender heterogeneity when assessing the public health implications of urban form.

This exploratory study addresses the problem of limited research on quality assessments of newly emerging multi-use market formats that function as social hubs and their management as privately managed public spaces. Using Āgenskalns Market, a revitalised multi-use market hall in Riga, as a case study, the authors apply an assessment framework based on Yuri Impens’ study on covered food halls, incorporating quality criteria from Vikas Mehta’s Public Space Index and the UN-Habitat’s Site-Specific assessment methodology. Leclercq et al.’s works on privatisation of public spaces are integrated in the analysis of “publicness”. This framework evaluates user and observer perceptions across four dimensions: environmental quality and comfort, accessibility and amenities, social experience, and market offer. Data comprised an online survey of 318 respondents and 21 structured observations conducted during summer in 2024 and 2025. The preliminary results suggest users perceive the market as a well-maintained, aesthetically pleasing, accessible space, while identifying room for improvement regarding restroom facilities, indoor thermal regulation, noise mitigation, outdoor weather protection and parking arrangements. As for meaningful use and promoting sociability, findings highlight that flexible seating areas that allow high degrees of temporary personalisation and appropriation, alongside tailored programming and diverse activities beyond retail and dining, play an important role in attracting and retaining diverse audiences. While pricing concerns were noted for specific product groups, exclusionary effects appear to be counterbalanced by openness and inclusivity of cultural programmes and free events. The findings contribute to broader urban scholarship discussions calling for new typologies that better capture the changing character of public space use. This research suggests that private-public partnerships involving multiple stakeholders can enhance “publicness” by promoting inclusivity and social life through accessible infrastructure, diverse activities and free events, as well as enabling opportunities for temporary appropriation by users.

Amidst Portugal’s ongoing housing crisis, particularly pronounced in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area, thousands of residential units remain vacant. This article investigates why property owners often refrain from placing these homes on the rental market, despite high demand and rising prices. Drawing on empirical data from successive editions of the ALP (Lisbon Landlords Association) Barometer and framed by the literature on housing financialization, institutional trust, and patrimonial ownership cultures, the study shows that vacancy is not merely a result of speculation or neglect. Rather, it emerges as a rational response to a complex interplay of regulatory instability, legal mistrust, and deeply rooted socio-cultural norms. Landlords act not only as economic agents but also as custodians of family heritage, navigating uncertainty in a legal and symbolic environment increasingly perceived as hostile. The article argues that mobilizing Lisbon’s empty housing stock requires more than tax incentives or coercive measures. It demands rebuilding trust, ensuring legal predictability, and acknowledging the cultural meanings that shape property decisions. Policy recommendations include stabilizing rental legislation and designing culturally sensitive engagement strategies for small landlords.

(1) Background: As social infrastructures, cemeteries have always played a central role in various human cultures. The changing function of cemeteries and the recognition of their potential as green spaces have resulted in the fact that cemeteries are a subject of considerable urban planning research. However, there still is a knowledge gap for the case of Vienna. In this study, from the perspective of urban planning and the city of Vienna as an operator of interdenominational cemeteries on the one hand, and of operators of denominational cemeteries on the other hand, consideration of cemeteries in strategic urban planning is discussed, and prospects for the future are outlined. (2) Methods: A qualitative content analysis of relevant strategic planning documents and a qualitative theme-centred stakeholder survey using guideline interviews were conducted. The results were put into the context of the international literature. (3) Results: Cemeteries are an integral part of urban morphology and fabric. Interdenominational cemeteries serve multiple purposes, for example, as places of remembrance, leisure and recreation. In addition, the growing importance of interdenominational cemeteries in particular as green infrastructure for the public is evident. (4) Conclusions: Despite population growth and the associated pressure on land and densification, no changes such as the decommissioning of cemeteries are to be expected in the medium term.

From an ecological perspective, sustainable lighting in urban marine areas requires striking a balance between meeting human needs and protecting marine ecosystems from the harmful effects of disrupting natural light regimes. While managing artificial lighting is crucial, we argue that preventing obstructions to light penetration into the water is as important, as many marine organisms depend on the euphotic zone. This study intends to review the key factors for the implementation of wildlife-friendly lighting design in the urban marine environment, as the subject is explored in ecological studies but scarcely discussed in urban studies. An integrative literature review and cases are employed to synthesise evidence about changes to the light regime in urban marine areas from four perspectives: light reach, intensity, spectrum, and duration. The cases present measures implemented to benefit marine species affected by alterations to the light regime following urbanisation in a way that they could still thrive in a modified built environment. In discussion, it is acknowledged that achieving sustainable lighting in urban marine areas is a multifaceted challenge involving concurrent influencing factors, including a shared agency between humans and non-humans, which may require comprehensive lighting designs that are tailored to specific goals and target species.

This study investigates the impact of a self-built architectural intervention implemented in three areas, two intervention sites and one control site of a university campus, focusing on how such interventions can influence the use and care of open spaces. Surveys were administered before and after the intervention to a purposive sample of 54 habitual campus users, recruited through peer referrals and contacted via informal channels such as in-person interactions, phone calls, and shared student groups. The surveys were completed anonymously using Google Forms. Data were analyzed using mixed-effects models to evaluate changes over time, across sites, and time x site interaction. Results showed a significant increase over time in participants’ intention to care for the whole campus. Intentions to spend time in outdoor areas varied significantly across sites but did not change over time, and no time × site interaction was detected, indicating that observed changes were not confined to intervention sites. These findings highlight the potential of user-centered design interventions to enhance the quality, accessibility, and usability of open areas by providing empirical insights relevant to urban planning and the management of public spaces. Overall, this research suggests that self-build initiatives within university campuses can serve as scalable models for fostering sustainable urban environments, promoting citizen engagement, and improving urban well-being.

Identifying the environmental and social factors that influence crime is crucial for effective crime prevention and for building safer cities. Boundary areas are often neglected, despite being hotspots for criminal activity. However, previous studies have primarily focused on physical boundaries, with insufficient attention paid to social boundaries shaped by factors such as population composition and socioeconomic disparities. Additionally, existing research methods remain limited in scope, with models that struggle to capture the nonlinear and complex nature of these relationships. This study proposes a comprehensive approach by measuring both multidimensional physical and social boundaries within urban environments. Using machine learning models, we present three main findings: urban boundaries are strong predictors of crime; boundary variables show stronger correlations with crime than intra-area variables; and both social and physical boundaries warrant equal attention. These findings suggest that governments should enhance problem-oriented policing at boundary hotspots in urban boundary areas while also promoting social integration to address the root causes of crime.