- Research Article
- 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaf231.981
P0800 Real-world use of upadacitinib in Inflammatory Bowel Disease patients in Greece: Focus on adverse events
- Jan 01, 2026
- Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis
- A Neokleous + 7 more +7
Abstract Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is a reversible selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK 1) inhibitor indicated for the treatment of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Common adverse events (AEs) include upper respiratory tract infections, anaemia and increased blood creatine phosphokinase (CPK), whereas concern has been raised about cardiovascular events (CV). Additionally, uncommon adverse events may involve herpes zoster and acne. We present the real-world experience of UPA in patients with IBD, from two tertiary centres in Greece, focusing on safety. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of IBD patients who continue or had received UPA in our departments. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as reported AEs during UPA treatment, were documented. Severity and frequency of AEs were monitored according to standard clinical practice. Results We identified 77 patients on UPA treatment: 23 (29.9%) experienced at least 1 AE during treatment; 69.8% were male, with a mean age of 36.8 years (±11.9), 47.8% with CD, and a median disease duration of 9 years (IQR 8.5). Demographics and clinical characteristics are summarised in Table 1. A total of 30 AEs were recorded. Respiratory tract infections represented the most prevalent AE (36.3%), followed by any other infection (16.6%) and metabolic disorders (hyperlipidaemia) (13.3%) (Fig. 1). Fourteen AEs (46.7%) manifested during the induction phase of the treatment (45mg), 20% led eventually to permanent discontinuation of UPA (due to recurrent respiratory tract infections, severe acne, small bowel perforation and cutaneous staphylococcus infection), 46.6% required both temporary drug interruption and AE focused treatment and 3.33% improved after dosage adjustment. In the remaining cases, therapy withdrawal was unnecessary. Four out of 30 were documented as serious AEs. No death has been reported. Patients who experienced serious adverse events were all male, and 75% of them had previously received anti–TNFα therapy. Potential risk factors for the development of adverse events, such as smoking, age, duration of the disease and BMI, were not shown to have a statistically significant difference. No major cardiac or thrombotic events were observed, nor was any cancer case reported. At this time point, 73.1% of the patients continue UPA treatment. Conclusion Most adverse events were non-serious (86.7%) and manageable after a temporary interruption of UPA or after dosage adjustment. Most of them were consistent with the drug’s known safety profile. Further studies are warranted to validate these observations and better characterise the treatment’s safety profile. Conflict of interest: Mr. Neokleous, Antonis: No conflict of interest Pagoni, Anna: No conflict of interest Liatsos, Christos: No conflict of interest Kyriakos, Nikolaos: No conflict of interest Zacharopoulou, Eirini: No conflict of interest Tsokanta, Konstantina: No conflict of interest Aravantinoy Koytsoyvi, Artemis Stavroyla: No conflict of interest Tzouvala, Maria: No conflict of interest
Read more