Abbott (Netherlands)

ABSTRACT Background This study was conducted to compare the immunogenicity and safety profile of two quadrivalent influenza vaccines (QIVs) in healthy adults (18–60 years) and elderly (>61 years) participants. Method This phase III study was conducted from March 2018 to April 2018 across 12 sites in India. In this randomized, observer-blind, active-controlled study, 480 participants were randomized to receive a single dose of test vaccine (subunit, inactivated influenza vaccine; Influvac® Tetra, Abbott) (n = 240) or reference vaccine (split virion, inactivated influenza vaccine; VaxiFlu-4, Zydus Cadilla Healthcare) (n = 240). The primary objective was to describe and compare the immunogenicity of each vaccination group based on hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay seroprotection and seroconversion rates, and geometric mean fold increase (GMFI) against four vaccine strains in two age groups. Safety and reactogenicity were also compared for the vaccines in both the age groups. Results The pre- and post-vaccination HI titers for both the vaccines were comparable. The GMFI varied from 4.3 – 22.7 in the test and 3.7–21.6 in the reference vaccine group. The seroprotection rates were >90% for the A-strains and ranged between >43% and <60% for B-strains for both the vaccines. Seroconversion rates varied between 41.4% and 78.8%. Overall, the reported adverse events (AEs) for both the vaccines were <1% and comparable. Reported local and systemic reactions were comparable. Conclusion Influvac® Tetra elicited an adequate immune response with a favorable safety profile which was comparable with the reference vaccine. (Clinical trial registry number: CTRI/2018/02/012222)

Traditional methods to increase depth of focus result in the reduction of distance vision and increased side-effects. We present how the combination of different technologies can significantly improve depth of focus and visual performance.

Crystal City V meeting on Quantitative Bioanalytical Method Validation and Implementation: 2013 Revised US FDA Guidance 3-5 December 2013, Hilton Baltimore, MD, USA The meeting provided an opportunity for Industry and regulators from the US FDA to discuss the recently published revised draft FDA Guidance for Industry on Bioanalytical Methods Validation during the 90 day review period. Key perspective and philosophical positions were shared leading to a healthy exchange of views and ideas on topics in the revised document. Discussions covered all aspects of bioanalytical method validation and method utilization. However, the main dialogue was focused on chromatographic methods, ligand-binding assay methods and biomarker analysis. The resulting open debate led to greater understanding of the document, but also provided clear feedback, including the request on harmonization with approved Bioanalytical Methods Validation guidance's release from other health authorities, as well as the consensus view between industry and the FDA. Members of the European Bioanalysis Forum summarized prospective discussions during the meeting in Baltimore; however, this Report is not intended to constitute the official proceedings from the meeting, which are expected to be published later this year.

The 4th Open Symposium of the European Bioanalytical Forum entitled 'Less is More' was held on 16-18 November 2011 at the Hesperia Tower Hotel, Barcelona, Spain. More than 50 interesting presentations were delivered covering areas with interest for the small- and large-molecule community - biomarker validation; regulations, including an update on new and emerging guidelines and on Global harmonization; technology updates; incurred sample stability; microdosing; dried blood spots and microsampling; challenges of 'free' and 'total' macromolecule quantification; stability issues in ligand binding assays or anomalous results. In excess of 450 delegates from more than 170 institutes and companies (industry, regulators and academia) from all global regions participated in the open and stimulating discussions. This manuscript provides an overview of the highlights discussed at the meeting.