Indefinite Terms? Social Groups in Early Ancient China (ca. 1300–771 BC) and “Strong Asymmetrical Dependency”
In this paper, 1 I am going to explore the question whether social relations of "strong asymmetrical dependency" can be identified during the earliest historical periods of ancient China: the late Shng (ca. 1300-ca. 1045 BC) and Western Zhu (ca. 1045-771 BC). Although many cultural, social, paleographic, and linguistic features of later "China" originate in them, and important social and political processes beginning under the Western Zhu eventually led to the formation of the Chinese empire in 221 BC, society in these periods differs to some extent from that of later periods. I will therefore look for examples of "strong asymmetrical dependency" in epigraphic sources, paying particular attention to designations of social groups. This entails, in a first step, a re-evaluation of previous scholarship regarding the presumed existence of "slaves" in early Chinese antiquity, because ancient China often has been regarded as a so-called "slave society" in certain historical stages, thus problematizing the usage of later social terminology for far earlier social phenomena. 2 In a second step, I am going to look at possible cases of "strong asymmetrical dependency" in ancient inscribed texts: How can they be identified? And finally, I shall consider alternative I am very grateful to Maxim Korolkov for valuable comments on this paper that helped to improve it, and to Chai Jianhong, John Gillingham, Matthias Richter, Anne Sapich, Christian Schwer-
Read more