- Research Article
- 10.1007/s12325-026-03553-z
Use of Aflibercept 8mg for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Italy: A Cost-Minimisation Analysis Based on an Indirect Treatment Comparison.
- Mar 28, 2026
- Advances in therapy
- Paolo A Cortesi + 6 more +6
Despite the availability of various anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapies for diabetic macular edema (DME), high treatment burden remains a significant issue in many European countries, including Italy. This burden impacts healthcare costs, clinic capacities, and patient adherence. Aflibercept 8mg was developed to reduce treatment burden by requiring only three monthly injections before allowing extended dosing intervals up to 6months, without compromising efficacy and safety. This analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and treatment burden of aflibercept 8mg regimens compared to other anti-VEGF options (aflibercept 2mg, ranibizumab 0.5mg, faricimab 6mg, brolucizumab 6mg, and bevacizumab 1.25mg) in Italy. A systematic literature review identified randomised controlled trials of anti-VEGF therapies for DME with a 2-year follow-up. This informed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) assessing efficacy, safety, and treatment burden. A cost-minimisation analysis (CMA) was conducted from the perspective of the Italian National Health System over a 2-year horizon. The NMA, involving nine studies, showed no significant differences in best-corrected visual acuity, anatomical outcomes, and safety between aflibercept 8mg and the other anti-VEGF agents. Aflibercept 8mg required fewer injections than the comparators, with a mean of 9.3 injections over 2years for T&E (Q12) and 8.4 for T&E (Q16) regimens. Economically, aflibercept 8mg was the least costly licensed and reimbursed anti-VEGF in Italy. Aflibercept 8mg may be the most advantageous anti-VEGF option for reducing treatment burden in Italian patients with DME, benefiting healthcare providers, clinics, and the healthcare system. Aflibercept 8mg offers comparable efficacy and safety to other anti-VEGF therapies, with fewer injections and potentially lower overall costs.
Read more