Budgetary Health Care Institution of the Omsk Region "Clinical Oncology Center"

Background. Adjuvant targeted therapy (ATT) with a combination of dabrafenib and trametinib after radical surgical treatment in patients with stage III skin melanoma (SM) with a BRAF V600 mutation reduces the risk of disease recurrence. The effectiveness of this approach has been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials, and also confirmed in several large non-Russian real-world (RW) studies. Aim. To evaluate, in RW settings, the effectiveness of ATT with a combination of dabrafenib and trametinib after definitive surgical treatment in patients with BRAF V600-positive SM in Russia. Materials and methods. The RATIONALE study is a prospective, non-interventional, multicenter RW study. The follow-up duration for the study was 1 year. Patients with SM older than 18 years who had previously started dabrafenib and trametinib therapy no more than 8 weeks prior to Visit 1 were included in the study. The paper presents results from the analysis of Cohort 1 only (patients who received dabrafenib and trametinib in the adjuvant setting). Results. The cohort included 214 patients with BRAF V600-mutated SM of stages IIIA–D and IV resectable. At the time of therapy initiation, the majority of patients were stage IIIc (54.7%) or IIIb (22.0%). The most common mutation – BRAF V600E – occurred in 66.3% of cases, while the second most common variant – BRAF V600 not otherwise specified – was detected in 31.3%. One-year overall survival for all included patients was 94%, one-year relapse-free survival was 84%, and one-year distant metastasis-free survival was 86%. No previously listed adverse events were reported. Adverse events led to therapy discontinuation in only 11.7% of cases. ATT did not reduce patients' quality of life. In the subgroup analysis, the effectiveness of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib after removal of distant metastases (equivalent to stage IV resectable) was found, in particular, the one-year relapse-free survival rate was 83%, and the one-year overall survival rate was 100%, which is comparable to these indicators for stage IIIB-D (72–86 and 78–100%, respectively). Conclusion. The effectiveness and favorable safety profile of the combination of dabrafenib and trametinib in ATT after radical surgical treatment was confirmed in a population of Russian patients with SM in the RW settings.

Objective RATIONALE-305 (NCT03777657) demonstrated that tislelizumab plus chemotherapy statistically improved overall survival versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). This analysis examined patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at final analysis. Methods Adults with previously untreated, unresectable, or metastatic GC/GEJC were randomized (1:1) to tislelizumab or placebo intravenously once every 3 weeks plus chemotherapy. PROs assessed health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-STO22. A mixed model for repeated measures was used for PRO endpoints at treatment cycles 4 and 6, and time to deterioration was analyzed. Results Tislelizumab arm had improved outcomes over placebo arm in least-squares (LS) mean change from baseline to cycle 6 for QLQ-C30 global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL) (LS mean difference, 2.52 [95% CI: 0.29–4.74]), physical functioning (2.46 [0.49–4.43]), fatigue (–3.01 [–5.78 to −0.24]), and STO22 index score (–1.62 [–3.12 to −0.12]) as well as maintenance of upper gastrointestinal symptoms (–1.74 [–3.55–0.06]) and pain/discomfort (–1.88 [–4.03–0.27]). Patients receiving tislelizumab plus chemotherapy had a lower risk for deterioration of GHS/QoL (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI: 0.60–0.98]), physical functioning (0.72 [0.57–0.92]), STO22 index score (0.64 [0.45–0.92]), pain/discomfort (0.74 [0.58–0.96]), and upper gastrointestinal symptoms (0.73 [0.56–0.95]). Conclusions Advanced GC/GEJC patients treated with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy in first-line had sustained and improved HRQoL. These results, along with previous efficacy and safety data, support tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment option for GC/GEJC. Trial registration The RATIONALE-305 trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03777657).ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03777657.

Abstract Background: BCD-217-2/OCTAVA (NCT05732805) is an international, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study conducted to access the efficacy and safety of prolgolimab+nurulimab (BCD-217) combination therapy with continued prolgolimab therapy compared to prolgolimab monotherapy as 1st line treatment for patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (un/mM). BCD-217 is a fixed-dose combination of nurulimab (aCTLA-4, 5 mg/ml) and prolgolimab (aPD-1, 15 mg/ml) was recently approved as the 1st line treatment for un/mM in Russia. Here we present the primary analysis of the study. Methods: Pts with unresectable or metastatic cutaneous melanoma (IIIC-IVM1a-c) with treatment- naïve for unresectable/metastatic disease were randomized in 2 treatment arms: combination drug containing nurulimab (1 mg/kg) and prolgolimab (3 mg/kg) at a dose of 0.2 ml/kg Q3W during the first four blinded infusions (nuru+prolgo arm) and prolgo arm received prolgolimab monotherapy at a dose of 3 mg/kg Q3W during the first four blinded infusions. Then both arms received prolgolimab maintenance up to two years. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 271 pts were randomized to nuru+prolgo (n=135) or prolgo monotherapy (n=136) arms. After the median of 15.8 mo follow-up the median PFS (mPFS) was 15.4 (10.3; ND) mo in the nuru+prolgo group and 10.8 (4.7; ND) mo in the prolgo monotherapy group (95% CI, HR 0.68 (0.482; 0.957), iRECIST). The mPFS benefit of nuru+prolgo arm compared to prolgo arm are maintained in RECIST 1.1 assessment: 9.9 mo vs 2.8 mo, respectively. ORR and DCR were also higher in NURU+PROLGO arm. mOS was not reached in both groups (95% CI, HR 0,88, (0.50; 1.55)). 12-mos OS was 84% in each arm. Grade 3-4 treatment-related AE were reported in 16.3% of pts in nuru+prolgo arm compared to 14.0% - prolgo arm. Immune-related AEs (irAE) of all grades were reported in 52.6% of cases in nuru+prolgo arm and 32.4% of cases - in prolgo arm (p 0.0007). Majority of them were mild. The proportion of gr.≥3 irAEs was 13.3% vs 5.9% in nuru+prolgo arm and prolgo arm, respectively (p 0.04). Treatment discontinuation due to AE was reported in 9.6% of cases for nuru+prolgo vs 4.4% of cases for prolgo arm. Conclusions: OCTAVA trial resuts demonstrated that the fixed-dose combination of nurulimab + prolgolimab is significantly more effective than aPD-1 monotherapy without a serious deterioration of the safety profile in patients with metastatic or unresectable cutaneous melanoma as 1st line therapy. Citation Format: Lev Demidov, Igor Samoylenko, Galina Kharkevich, Kristina Orlova, Vladimir Moiseenko, Igor Utyashev, Daniil Stroyakovskiy, Vadim Kozlov, Anastasia Mochalova, Svetlana Demidova, Marina Lyadova, Andrey Kutkovich, Pavel Skopin, Nadezhda Kovalenko, Sufia Safina, Vitaliy Volkov, Yulia Semiletova, Vera Vaschenko, Nikolaiy Kislov, Artem Poltoratsky, Irina Shumskaya, Sergey Kolomiets, Alexander Sobolev, Igor Belogortsev, Svetlana Odintsova, Sameer Rastogi, Timur Andabekov, Anastasia Zimina, Konstantin Penkov, Anna Semenova, Alexey Obukhov, Vasiliy Belyakovsky, Oleg Gladkov, Rakesh Neve, Natalia Falaleeva, Elena Poddubskaya, Amale Vaibhav, Dmitriy Kirtbaya, Yana Chapko, Maria Smagina, Irina Sorokina, Yulia Linkova, Arina Zinkina-Orikhan, Fedor Kriukov, Anton Lutsky, Evgenia Mikhailova. Proved clinical benefit of low-dose anti-CTLA4 + anti-PD-1 immunotherapy versus mono anti-PD-1 therapy in patients unresectable or metastatic melanoma: Phase III OCTAVA trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 653.

The aim of the work was to compare the salivary cytokine profile of breast cancer patients with the clinicopathological characteristics of the tumor. The study included 113 patients with breast cancer (main group, mean age 54.1 years) and 111 patients with breast fibroadenomas (control group, mean age 56.7 years). Before treatment, saliva samples were collected from all patients and the content of cytokines (IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-18, MCP-1, and TNF-α) was determined. The content of cytokines in saliva correlates well with the clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer. The level of all salivary cytokines increases at advanced stages of breast cancer and at a low degree of tumor differentiation. The exception is MCP-1, for which there is an extremely high content for well-differentiated breast cancer. A statistically significant increase in the content of MCP-1, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-4, and IL-10 was found in triple-negative breast cancer. For the first time, the correlation of salivary levels of TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 with HER2 status, MCP-1, IL-1β, IL-2, and IL-4 with the hormonal status of the tumor was shown. The relationship between the level of IL-2, IL-10, and IL-18 in saliva with the level of Ki-67 expression has been established.

9527 Background: Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy may produce durable and deep response in a higher proportion of pts with BRAF V600–mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma. A recent report from the randomized, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled Part 3 of the Phase 3 COMBI-i trial (NCT02967692) failed to show a statistically significant progression-free survival (PFS) benefit (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.66‒1.03, p=.042)). Here, we report 3-year OS data from COMBI-i part 3. Methods: Eligible pts were randomized 1:1 to receive either S+D+T (n = 267; S 400 mg IV Q4W + D 150 mg orally BID + T 2 mg orally QD) or PBO+D+T (n = 265), until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Although the primary endpoint of PFS was not met, exploratory OS and safety analyses were performed. OS was summarized descriptively using Kaplan–Meier methods and HR was estimated using a stratified cox regression model. Results: As of October 19, 2021 (median follow-up, 42.8 months), the median OS was not reached in S+D+T arm and was 40.4 months with PBO+D+T (HR 0.796; 95% CI, 0.615‒1.029). There were 113 (42.3%) deaths in the S+D+T and 126 (47.5%) in the PBO+D+T. Estimated 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 67.7% (95% CI 61.6‒73.1) and 60.1% (95% CI 53.8‒65.8) with S+D+T vs 61.9% (95% CI 55.6‒67.5) and 52.9% (95% CI 46.6‒58.9) with PBO+D+T, respectively. An OS benefit was observed with S+D+T in these prespecified subgroups – Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 1 (HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.32‒0.8), age ≥65 years (HR 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36‒0.94), PD-L1 negative ( < 1%) (HR 0.62; 95% CI, 0.42‒0.91), sum of lesion diameters ≥ 66 mm at baseline (HR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.43‒0.91) and metastatic sites ≥ 3 (HR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47‒0.94). Adverse events (AEs) irrespective of study treatment relationship were observed in 99.3% of pts in S+D+T vs 97.3% in PBO+D+T. The most common AEs (in > 30%; all grades) were pyrexia, diarrhea, and nausea. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) occurred in 56.9% vs 35.2% of pts treated with S+D+T vs PBO+D+T, respectively. Dose reductions of D and T due to AEs were more frequent in the S+D+T arm than PBO+D+T arm (47.2% vs 25.4% and 45.7% vs 25.4%, respectively), contributing to a lower relative dose intensity; the TRAEs leading to discontinuation of all 3 study drugs occurred in 13.5% vs 8% of pts, respectively. Conclusions: Results from this landmark 3-year OS analysis from COMBI-i- part 3 was consistent with the primary analysis, while the PBO+D+T showed a higher OS rate than previously observed for D+T alone in COMBI D/V studies, with a longer median follow-up. Subgroup analyses showed that ECOG PS 1, age ≥65 years, negative PD-L1 status and high tumor burden were associated with better OS in S+D+T in terms of HR. Clinical trial information: NCT02967692.

PURPOSEPreclinical data suggest the combination of an anti–programmed death receptor 1 antibody plus dabrafenib and trametinib to have superior antitumor activity compared with dabrafenib plus trametinib alone. These observations are supported by translational evidence suggesting that immune checkpoint inhibitors plus targeted therapy may improve treatment outcomes in patients with BRAF V600–mutant metastatic melanoma. COMBI-i is a phase III trial evaluating spartalizumab, an anti–programmed death receptor 1 antibody, in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib (sparta-DabTram), versus placebo plus dabrafenib and trametinib (placebo-DabTram) in patients with BRAF V600–mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma.METHODSPatients received spartalizumab 400 mg intravenously every 4 weeks plus dabrafenib 150 mg orally twice daily and trametinib 2 mg orally once daily or placebo-DabTram. Participants were age ≥ 18 years with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600–mutant melanoma. The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival. Overall survival was a key secondary end point (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02967692).RESULTSAt data cutoff (July 1, 2020), the median progression-free survival was 16.2 months (95% CI, 12.7 to 23.9 months) in the sparta-DabTram arm versus 12.0 months (95% CI, 10.2 to 15.4 months) in the placebo-DabTram arm (hazard ratio, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.66 to 1.03]; P = .042 [one-sided; nonsignificant]). The objective response rates were 69% (183 of 267 patients) versus 64% (170 of 265 patients), respectively. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 55% (146 of 267) of patients in the sparta-DabTram arm and 33% (88 of 264) in the placebo-DabTram arm.CONCLUSIONThe study did not meet its primary end point; broad first-line use of sparta-DabTram is not supported by these results. Further biomarker-driven investigation may identify patient subpopulations who could benefit from checkpoint inhibitor plus targeted therapy combinations.

Abstract Introduction: Rituximab (R)-based therapies are standard for patients (pts) with relapsed advanced iNHL. Copanlisib (C) is a PI3K inhibitor approved as monotherapy for relapsed follicular lymphoma (FL) in pts who have had ≥2 prior systemic therapies. We report primary data from the Phase III CHRONOS-3 study of treatment with C+R vs placebo (P)+R in relapsed iNHL (NCT02367040). Methods: Pts with relapsed iNHL who were progression-free and treatment-free for ≥12 months (mo) after last R-based therapy or unwilling/unfit to receive chemotherapy were randomized 2:1 to receive C+R or P+R. C 60 mg/P was given i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 (28-day cycle); R 375 mg/m2 was given i.v. on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 during cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 3, 5, 7, and 9. Primary endpoint: centrally assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints: objective response rate (ORR), duration of response, complete response rate (CRR), overall survival (OS), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). The data cut-off date was August 31, 2020. Results: 307 pts were randomized to C+R and 151 to P+R. FL was the most common lymphoma histology subtype (60.0%), followed by marginal zone (MZL, 20.7%), small lymphocytic (SLL, 10.9%), and lymphoplasmacytic/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM, 8.3%). Median age was 63 years (range 28-91). With a median follow-up of 19.2 mo, the primary study endpoint was met: C+R significantly reduced the risk of disease progression/death vs P+R (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52 [95% CI 0.39, 0.69]; 1-sided p=0.000002); median PFS was 21.5 mo (95% CI 17.8, 33.0) vs 13.8 mo (95% CI 10.2, 17.5), respectively. Reductions in risk of progression/death were seen across all histology subtypes (HR [95% CI]): FL 0.580 [0.404, 0.833]; MZL 0.475 [0.245, 0.923]; SLL 0.243 [0.111, 0.530]; LPL/WM 0.443 [0.160, 1.231]. ORRs were 80.8% (CRR 33.9%) for C+R and 47.7% (CRR 14.6%) for P+R. Higher ORRs and CRRs were seen across all iNHL subtypes with C+R treatment. Median OS was not estimable. Most common TEAEs (all grades [G]/G3+) in pts receiving C+R were hyperglycemia (69.4%/56.4%), hypertension (49.2%/39.7% [all G3]), and diarrhea (33.6%/4.9% [all G3]). For pts receiving P+R, hyperglycemia (23.3%/8.2% [all G3]), hypertension (19.2%/8.9% [all G3]), neutropenia (16.4%/12.3%), and upper respiratory tract infection (16.4%/0%) were the most common TEAEs. Serious adverse events were higher with C+R (47.2%) vs P+R (18.5%). G5 TEAEs occurred in 6 pts (2.0%) receiving C+R (1 [0.3%] deemed treatment-related; pneumonitis) and 1 (0.7%) receiving P+R. Conclusions: C+R demonstrated broad and superior efficacy vs P+R in pts with relapsed iNHL. The safety profile of C+R was manageable and consistent with C and R as monotherapy. Copanlisib is the first PI3K inhibitor to be safely combined with R in relapsed iNHL, representing a potential new therapy option for relapsed iNHL across all subtypes. Citation Format: Matthew J. Matasar, Marcelo Capra, Muhit Özcan, Fangfang Lv, Wei Li, Eduardo Yañez, Katya Sapunarova, Tongyu Lin, Jie Jin, Wojciech Jurczak, Aryan Hamed, Ming-Chung Wang, Ross Baker, Igor Bondarenko, Qingyuan Zhang, Jifeng Feng, Klaus Geissler, Mihaela Lazaroiu, Guray Saydam, Árpád Szomor, Krimo Bouabdallah, Rinat Galiulin, Toshiki Uchida, Lidia Mongay Soler, Anjun Cao, Florian Hiemeyer, Aruna Mehra, Barrett H. Childs, Yuankai Shi, Pier Luigi Zinzani. CHRONOS-3: Randomized Phase III study of copanlisib plus rituximab vs rituximab/placebo in relapsed indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT001.