CanSino (China)

Background: Pneumococcal diseases remain a global threat due to the serotype-specific limitations of polysaccharide vaccines. This study evaluated a recombinant protein-based pneumococcal vaccine (PBPV) combining three PspA variants (PRX1/Family1Clade2, P3296/Family2/Clade3, P5668/Family2/Clade4) and detoxified pneumolysin (PlyLD). PspA targets conserved surface epitopes to block immune evasion and achieve broad coverage, while PlyLD neutralizes pore-forming toxins and enhances adaptive immunity. Methods: We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the PBPV in animal models. Acute toxicity studies were conducted by administering a single intramuscular injection to ICR mice, whereas chronic toxicity and immunogenicity studies were performed in cynomolgus monkeys via repeated intramuscular injections, with an equal number of male and female animals in both groups. Immune responses were assessed using ELISA, multiplexed opsonophagocytic killing assays (MOPAs), and neutralizing antibody assays. Results: Acute toxicity studies in ICR mice showed no signs of abnormal toxicity or irritation at one-dose levels. In the chronic toxicity study, cynomolgus monkeys received repeated intramuscular injections once every 3 weeks for a total of four administrations, at doses of one dose/monkey and five doses/monkey, followed by a 4-week recovery period. No significant systemic toxic reactions were observed, and the safe dose was determined to be five doses/monkey. In the immunogenicity study of monkey serum, both low-dose and high-dose groups demonstrated significant increases in antigen-specific IgG titers against each component; opsonophagocytic killing activity against pneumococcal strains from Clades 2, 3, and 4 from PspA Families 1 and 2; and neutralization antibody titers against pneumolysin post-vaccination. Conclusions: The recombinant protein-based pneumococcal vaccine exhibited a favorable safety profile and potent immunogenicity in animal models, indicating promise for broad protection against pneumococcal disease. These findings support the further development of PBPVs as a viable alternative to conventional polysaccharide-based vaccines.

Background/Objectives: Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) causes herpes zoster (HZ/shingles), particularly in older adults with weakened cell-mediated immunity (CMI), which is essential for controlling VZV reactivation and reducing HZ severity. Currently vaccines, like recombinant subunit or live-attenuated vaccine, showed shortcomings in eliciting CD8+ T-cell responses. Addressing this, we utilized the novel replication-defective chimpanzee adenovirus vector ChAdOx1 to construct the ChAdOx1-VZV (CVE) vaccine, using full-length glycoprotein E (gE) as antigen. This study evaluated the immunogenicity of a heterologous intramuscular (IM) prime/intranasal (IN) boost regimen with the aim of developing a novel VZV vaccine candidate. Methods: BALB/c mice were immunized with CVE using homologous or heterologous prime-boost regimens via IM or IN. And cynomolgus macaques were immunized intramuscularly with three doses of CVE. Cellular responses were assessed by intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) and IFN-γ ELISpot using splenocytes and PBMCs. Humoral responses were evaluated by serum gE-IgG ELISA and bone-marrow LLPC ELISpot. Memory subsets and tissue-resident T cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Results: Heterologous IM prime/IN boost CVE regimen markedly enhanced both cellular and humoral responses, especially CD8+ T-cell responses. The induced LLPC and memory T cell responses indicate the potential for long-term protection against herpes zoster. In cynomolgus macaques, CVE induced robust serum gE-specific IgG responses and strong IFN-γ secreting T-cell activity, supporting the immunogenicity of CVE in a genetically distinct primate model and enhancing its clinical translational potential. Conclusions: CVE induces potent cellular and humoral immunogenicity, with IM prime/IN boost vaccination. Cross species immunogenicity observed in nonhuman primates further strengthens the translational relevance of this platform. These findings support CVE as a promising herpes zoster vaccine candidate and provide a rationale for continued evaluation in human-relevant systems.

Background: Pre-existing adenovirus immunity restricts the utilization of adenovirus-vectored vaccines. The current study aims to conduct a pooled analysis of eight clinical trials to evaluate the influence of pre-existing Ad5 neutralizing antibodies on immunogenicity of Ad5-nCoV. Methods: The primary outcome indicator of this pooled analysis is the geometric mean titers (GMTs) of live SARS-CoV-2 NAbs against the wild-type strain on day 28 post-vaccination. Participants were divided into two cohorts: an adolescent cohort comprising individuals aged 6-17 years and an adult cohort with individuals aged 18 years and older. Within each cohort, individuals were further categorized into three subgroups based on their Ad5-nCoV vaccination schedules: one subgroup received a single intramuscular dose as the primary regimen (Ad5-IM-prime), another received an intramuscular dose as the heterologous prime-boost regimen (Ad5-IM-boost), and the last subgroup received an aerosolized dose as the heterologous prime-boost regimen (Ad5-IH-boost). Results: A total of 3512 participants were included in this pooled analysis. In the Ad5-IM-prime subgroup, there were 1001 adolescents and 1450 adults; in the Ad5-IM-boost subgroup, there were 65 adolescents and 396 adults; and in the Ad5-IH-boost subgroup, there were 207 adolescents and 393 adults. In the adult cohort, the GMTs of NAbs against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 on day 28 post-vaccination for the Ad5-IM-prime, Ad5-IM-boost, and Ad5-IH-boost subgroups were 35.6 (95% CI: 32.0, 39.7), 358.3 (95% CI: 267.6, 479.6), and 2414.1 (95% CI: 2006.9, 2904.0), respectively, with negative (less than 1:12) pre-existing NAb titers compared to 10.7 (95% CI: 9.1, 12.6), 116.9 (95% CI: 84.9, 161.1), and 762.7 (95% CI: 596.2, 975.8), respectively, with high (greater than 1:1000) pre-existing NAb titers. A similar trend was observed in the adolescent cohort, where pre-existing immunity was found to reduce the peak of live SARS-CoV-2 Nabs post-vaccination. Conclusions: Regardless of whether Ad5-nCoV is administered as a primary vaccination regimen or as a heterologous prime-boost strategy, a negative impact on immunogenicity can still be observed in the presence of high pre-existing immunity. However, when primary immunization is achieved with inactivated COVID-19 vaccines, aerosol inhalation can significantly enhance the immunogenicity of Ad5-nCoV compared to intramuscular injections of Ad5-nCoV as a booster.

SummaryBackgroundDespite higher risk of poorer outcomes and potential sub-optimal vaccine effectiveness, people living with HIV (PLWH) are underrepresented in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine trials. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine (CanSino Biologics Inc./The Beijing Institute of Biotechnology) in PLWH.MethodsIn this single arm, open-label Phase 2b trial, PLWH were enrolled in Argentina. Participants received two doses of Ad5-nCoV vaccine (intramuscular, dosage 5×1010viral particles) at days 0 and 56. The primary outcomes were safety as serious adverse events [SAE], solicited and unsolicited local and systemic adverse events, impact on HIV viral load and CD4 counts and immunogenicity measured by S-RBD IgG and pseudo-virus neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) up to 52 weeks (ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT05005156).FindingsBetween June 2021-January 2022, 140 PLWH received at least one dose of Ad5-nCoV vaccine. At baseline, the majority were on antiretroviral therapy (99.3%), virologically suppressed (93.6%), with a median (IQR) CD4-cell count:736 (531-946) cells/ul. At baseline, 38 (27%) participants were seropositive for S-RBD antibodies, and 40 (28%) for nAbs. There were no SAEs related to the vaccine. Solicited AE within 7 days after first and second dose occurred in 93 (69%) and 75 (60%) participants, mostly grade 1, included pain, drowsiness and headache. The incidence of unsolicited AE within 28 days of vaccination was 10.7%. There were no significant changes in plasma viral load, CD4, CD4/CD8 ratio and no new AIDS-defining illnesses were reported. There were significant increases in the geometric mean titers (GMT) of S-RBD and nAbs between baseline to week 52. Seroconversion rates 28 days after the first and second doses (day 84) were 80% and 94% for S-RBD, and 35% and 78% for nAbs.InterpretationTwo doses of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine were safe and induced an adequate immune response in virologically suppressed PLWH, maintaining high antibody titers at least during the first year post-vaccination.FundingCanSino Biologics Inc, Tianjin, China

IntroductionThe SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has become the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant and exhibits immune escape to current COVID-19 vaccines, the further boosting strategies are required.MethodsWe have conducted a non-randomized, open-label and parallel-controlled phase 4 trial to evaluate the magnitude and longevity of immune responses to booster vaccination with intramuscular adenovirus vectored vaccine (Ad5-nCoV), aerosolized Ad5-nCoV, a recombinant protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) or homologous inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) in those who received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines. ResultsThe aerosolized Ad5-nCoV induced the most robust and long-lasting neutralizing activity against Omicron variant and IFNg T-cell response among all the boosters, with a distinct mucosal immune response. SARS-CoV-2-specific mucosal IgA response was substantially generated in subjects boosted with the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV at day 14 post-vaccination. At month 6, participants boosted with the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV had remarkably higher median titer and seroconversion of the Omicron BA.4/5-specific neutralizing antibody than those who received other boosters. DiscussionOur findings suggest that aerosolized Ad5-nCoV may provide an efficient alternative in response to the spread of the Omicron BA.4/5 variant.Clinical trial registrationhttps://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=152729, identifier ChiCTR2200057278.

ABSTRACT Antibody persistence and safety up to 12 months of heterologous orally administered adenovirus type-5 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine (Ad5-nCoV) in individuals who were primed with two-dose inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) previously, has not been reported yet. This randomized, open-label, single-centre trial included Chinese adults who have received two-dose CoronaVac randomized to low-dose or high-dose aerosolised Ad5-nCoV group, or CoronaVac group. In this report, we mainly evaluated the geometric mean titres (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus and omicron BA.4/5 pseudovirus at 12 months after the booster dose and the incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) till month 12. Of 419 participants, all were included in the safety analysis and 120 (28.64%) were included in the immunogenicity analysis. Serum NAb GMT against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 was 204.36 (95% CI 152.91, 273.14) in the low-dose group and 171.38 (95% CI 121.27, 242.19) in the high-dose group at month 12, significantly higher than the GMT in the CoronaVac group (8.00 [95% CI 4.22, 15.17], p < 0.0001). Serum NAb GMT against omicron BA.4/5 pseudovirus was 40.97 (95% CI 30.15, 55.67) in the low-dose group and 35.08 (95% CI 26.31, 46.77) in the high-dose group at month 12, whereas the GMT in the CoronaVac group was below the lower limit of detection. No vaccine-related SAEs were observed. Orally administered aerosolised Ad5-nCoV following two-dose CoronaVac priming has a good safety profile and is persistently more immunogenic than three-dose CoronaVac within 12 months after the booster dose. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05043259..

ABSTRACTCertain vaccines are more effective than others against microbial infections, but the molecular mechanisms separating the two types of vaccines are largely undefined. Here, by comparing two vaccines ofStreptococcus pneumoniaewith identical antigens but different efficacies (pneumococcal conjugate vaccine – PCV13 and pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine – PPV23), we reveal that superior vaccine protection against blood-borne bacteria is primarily achieved by activating pathogen capture of the sinusoidal endothelial cells (ECs) in the liver. Consistent with its superior protection in humans, PCV13 confers a more potent protection than PPV23 against pneumococcal infection in mice.In vivoreal-time imaging and genetic mutagenesis revealed that PCV13 activates both liver ECs and resident macrophages Kupffer cells (KCs) to capture IgG-coated bacteria via IgG Fc gamma receptor (FcγR). In particular, the FcγRIIB-mediated capture by ECs is responsible for PCV13-induced superior protection. In contrast, PPV23 only activates KCs (but not ECs) to achieve a less effective pathogen capture and protection through complement receptor-mediated recognition of IgM- and C3-coated bacteria. These liver-based vaccine protection mechanisms are also found with the vaccines ofNeisseria meningitidisandKlebsiella pneumoniae, another two important invasive human pathogens. Our findings have uncovered a novel EC- and FcγRIIB-mediated mechanism in the liver for more efficacious vaccine protection. These findings can serve asin vivofunctional readouts to evaluate vaccine efficacy and guide the future vaccine development.One Sentence SummaryVaccine efficacy is defined by FcγRIIB-mediated capture of antibody-coated bacteria via liver sinusoidal endothelial cells.

Abstract The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has become the dominant SARS-CoV-2 variant around the world and exhibits immune escape to current COVID-19 vaccines to some extent due to its numerous spike mutations. Here, we evaluated the immune responses to booster vaccination with intramuscular adenovirus-vectored vaccine (Ad5-nCoV), aerosolized Ad5-nCoV, a recombinant protein subunit vaccine (ZF2001) or homologous inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac) in those who received two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines 6 months prior. We found that the Ad5-nCoV booster induced potent neutralizing activity against the wild-type virus and Omicron variant, while aerosolized Ad5-nCoV generated the greatest neutralizing antibody responses against the Omicron variant at day 28 after booster vaccination, at 14.1-fold that of CoronaVac, 5.6-fold that of ZF2001 and 2.0-fold that of intramuscular Ad5-nCoV. Similarly, the aerosolized Ad5-nCoV booster produced the greatest IFNγ T-cell response at day 14 after booster vaccination. The IFNγ T-cell response to aerosolized Ad5-nCoV was 12.8-fold for CoronaVac, 16.5-fold for ZF2001, and 5.0-fold for intramuscular Ad5-nCoV. Aerosolized Ad5-nCoV booster also produced the greatest spike-specific B cell response. Our findings suggest that inactivated vaccine recipients should consider adenovirus-vectored vaccine boosters in China and that aerosolized Ad5-nCoV may provide a more efficient alternative in response to the spread of the Omicron variant.

The emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants and the waning of vaccine-elicited neutralizing antibodies suggests that additional coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine doses may be needed for individuals who initially received CoronaVac. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant adenovirus type 5 (AD5)-vectored COVID-19 vaccine Convidecia as a heterologous booster versus those of CoronaVac as homologous booster in adults previously vaccinated with CoronaVac in an ongoing, randomized, observer-blinded, parallel-controlled phase 4 trial (NCT04892459). Adults who had received two doses of CoronaVac in the past 3–6 months were vaccinated with Convidecia (n = 96) or CoronaVac (n = 102). Adults who had received one dose of CoronaVac in the past 1–3 months were also vaccinated with Convidecia (n = 51) or CoronaVac (n = 50). The co-primary endpoints were the occurrence of adverse reactions within 28 d after vaccination and geometric mean titers (GMTs) of neutralizing antibodies against live wild-type SARS-CoV-2 virus at 14 d after booster vaccination. Adverse reactions after vaccination were significantly more frequent in Convidecia recipients but were generally mild to moderate in all treatment groups. Heterologous boosting with Convidecia elicited significantly increased GMTs of neutralizing antibody against SARS-CoV-2 than homologous boosting with CoronaVac in participants who had previously received one or two doses of CoronaVac. These data suggest that heterologous boosting with Convidecia following initial vaccination with CoronaVac is safe and more immunogenic than homologous boosting.