Comprehensive Urology

Introduction: Lebrikizumab is a novel monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity and a slow off-rate to interleukin (IL)-13, thereby blocking the downstream effects of IL13 with high potency. ADmirable (NCT05372419) is an ongoing, open-label, Phase 3b clinical trial of lebrikizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and skin of color (SoC). These are the first primary results of any Phase 3 clinical trial studying patients with AD and SoC, a historically underrepresented patient population. Methods: At baseline and Week 2, patients received 500-mg lebrikizumab loading doses followed by 250-mg every 2 weeks through Week 16. Concomitant topical therapy was allowed. Patients receiving protocol-defined rescue therapy were discontinued. Key eligibility criteria included: ≥12 years of age, self-reported race other than White, Fitzpatrick Phototype IV-VI, and moderate-to-severe AD. This study includes new objective measures of pigment such as PDCA-Derm™. Endpoints are summarized as observed (primary analysis) and using non-responder imputation/multiple imputation (NRI/MI; supporting analysis). Results: At baseline (N=90), patients had a mean (SD) age of 40.7 (19.6) years, AD disease duration of 19.7 (16.1) years, Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) of 26.4 (12.2), and Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) of 7.0 (2.2). Forty-three percent of patients were female and 16% were adolescent. Most patients had an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) of 3 (69%). Patients self-reported their race as Black/African American (78%), Asian (11%), American Indian/Alaskan Native (7%), and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (4%). Patients had Fitzpatrick Phototypes of IV (43%), V (24%), and VI (32%). At Week 16, 69.2% (54/78) of patients achieved a 75% improvement in EASI (NRI/MI, 66.9%), 44.9% (35/78) achieved a 90% improvement in EASI (NRI/MI, 42.5%), 44.9% (35/78) achieved an IGA 0/1 with ≥2-point improvement (NRI/MI, 44.1%), and 58.1% (36/62) reported ≥4-point Pruritus NRS improvement (NRI/MI, 55.4%). Approximately 50% of patients reported itch improvement within 6 weeks. Using PDCA-Derm™, hypopigmentation and hyperpigmentation improved in 33.3% (4/12) and 63.0% (29/46) of patients, respectively (as observed). Most treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) were mild-to-moderate in severity. No TEAEs lead to discontinuation and no cases of treatment-related conjunctivitis were reported. No serious adverse events were observed. Conclusion: Lebrikizumab improved signs and symptoms of disease, including post-inflammatory pigment discoloration, in patients with AD and SoC and demonstrated a favorable safety profile.

BackgroundData are lacking to guide diagnosis and treatment in patients with skin of color and atopic dermatitis (AD), a population traditionally underrepresented in clinical trials. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab in adults and adolescents with skin of color and moderate-to-severe AD.MethodsIn the open-label ADmirable trial, 90 adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe AD, Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV–VI, and self-reported race other than White received lebrikizumab 250 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks (Q2W), following a 500-mg loading dose at baseline and Week 2, for 16 weeks. From Week 16 to Week 24, responders, defined as patients with at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI 75) and/or Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0/1 with at least a 2-point improvement from baseline, received lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W); inadequate responders continued lebrikizumab Q2W. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients achieving EASI 75 at Week 16. Secondary and exploratory efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed throughout. Data were analyzed as observed and using imputation, with Q2W and Q4W populations pooled for Weeks 16–24.ResultsMean age at baseline was 40.7 years; 43.3% were female; and 43.3%, 24.4%, and 32.2% had Fitzpatrick skin phototypes IV, V, and VI, respectively. Baseline mean EASI and Pruritus Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores were 26.4 and 7.0, respectively; 68.9% of patients had moderate disease (IGA = 3). At Week 16 (number of patients with non-missing values [Nx] = 78), EASI 75, EASI 90 (≥ 90% improvement from baseline in EASI), and IGA 0/1 (IGA response of clear or almost clear) were achieved by 69.2%, 44.9%, and 44.9% of patients, respectively; for Pruritus NRS (Nx = 62), 58.1% of patients reported ≥ 4-point improvement. At Week 24 (Nx = 74) (pooled treatment arms), EASI 75, EASI 90, and IGA 0/1 were achieved by 78.4%, 47.3%, and 54.1% of patients, respectively. EASI 75 was achieved by 62.9%, 88.2%, and 95.5% of patients with Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV (Nx = 35), V (Nx = 17), and VI (Nx = 22), respectively, at Week 24. Most patients (64.4%) with baseline PDCA-Derm™-assessed hyperpigmented areas showed reduced hyperpigmentation at Week 24. Most treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity; none were serious or led to discontinuation. One case of conjunctivitis was reported.ConclusionIn this first lebrikizumab study in patients with skin of color (Fitzpatrick skin phototype IV, V, and VI) and moderate-to-severe AD, lebrikizumab improved signs and symptoms of AD and confirmed its favorable safety profile.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05372419 (registered May 5, 2022).Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40257-025-00970-8.

Our aim was to investigate the perception and future expectations of Single-Port (SP) surgery among urology trainees in the United States. A 34-item online survey was distributed to urological residency and fellowship programs across the US, covering demographic profiles, SP training opportunities, perceived educational impact, and future perspectives. Descriptive analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to assess predictors of SP adoption. 201 surveys were completed (28.6% completion rate). Among institutions with an SP platform, about 50% have used it regularly for over 2 years, though often in less than 50% of procedures. While robotic simulators are commonly available, only 17% offer both multi-port and SP simulators, and structured pre-clinical SP training is limited. Approximately 30% of respondents expressed concerns over limited hands-on experience and a steeper learning curve with SP. Around 40% felt that their robotic surgery exposure was negatively impacted by SP's introduction. SP surgery's benefits are seen mostly in the immediate post-operative period and a significant number of respondents foresee a major role for SP in urology. However, proficiency in SP surgery is not seen as crucial for career advancement or job opportunities. Academic job aspirations, SP platform availability, and SP surgery workload are predictors of future SP implementation. Trainees increasingly recognize the clinical benefits of SP procedures but express concerns about the potential negative impact on hands-on experience. Training programs should more systematically integrate SP technology into curricula. There is a correlation between training in high-volume SP centers and future SP adoption.

BackgroundGenomic testing can add risk stratification information to clinicopathological features in prostate cancer, aiding in shared medical decision-making between the clinician and patient regarding whether active surveillance (AS) or definitive treatment (DT) is most appropriate. Here we examined initial AS selection and 3-year AS durability in patients diagnosed with localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer who underwent Prolaris testing before treatment decision-making.MethodsThis retrospective observational cohort study included 3208 patients from 10 study sites who underwent Prolaris testing at diagnosis from September 2015 to December 2018. Prolaris utilizes a combined clinical cell cycle risk score calculated at diagnostic biopsy to stratify patients by the Prolaris AS threshold (below threshold, patient recommended to AS or above threshold, patient recommended to DT). AS selection rates and 3-year AS durability were compared in patients recommended to AS or DT by Prolaris testing. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models and Cox proportional hazard models were used with molecular and clinical variables as predictors of initial treatment decision and AS durability, respectively.ResultsAS selection was ~2 times higher in patients recommended to AS by Prolaris testing than in those recommended to DT (p < 0.0001). Three-year AS durability was ~1.5 times higher in patients recommended to AS by Prolaris testing than in those recommended to DT (p < 0.0001). Prolaris treatment recommendation remained a statistically significant predictor of initial AS selection and AS durability after accounting for CAPRA or Gleason scores.ConclusionsProlaris added significant information to clinical risk stratification to aid in treatment decision making. Intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients who were recommended to AS by Prolaris were more likely to initially pursue AS and were more likely to remain on AS at 3 years post-diagnosis than patients recommended to DT.

Mittels pCLE kann das Lungenparenchym in vivo während der Bronchoskopie dargestellt und differentialdiagnostisch bei ILD genutzt werden. Dafür wurde eine semiquantitative Analyse der pCLE- Bilder anhand von 4 Kriterien (beladene Makrophagen (AM), Zerstörung, Verdichtung, Konsolidierung) vorgeschlagen 1. Wir analysierten den Nutzen der pCLE- Kriterien im Langzeitverlauf.

ObjectiveTo compare antibiotic resistance results at different time points in patients with urinary tract infections (UTIs), who were either treated based upon a combined multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) and pooled antibiotic susceptibility test (P-AST) or were not treated.MethodsThe M-PCR/P-AST test utilized here detects 30 UTI pathogens or group of pathogens, 32 antibiotic resistance (ABR) genes, and phenotypic susceptibility to 19 antibiotics. We compared the presence or absence of ABR genes and the number of resistant antibiotics, at baseline (Day 0) and 5–28 days (Day 5–28) after clinical management in the antibiotic-treated (n = 52) and untreated groups (n = 12).ResultsOur results demonstrated that higher percentage of patients had a reduction in ABR gene detection in the treated compared to the untreated group (38.5% reduction vs 0%, p = 0.01). Similarly, significantly more patients had reduced numbers of resistant antibiotics, as measured by the phenotypic P-AST component of the test, in the treated than in the untreated group (42.3% reduction vs 8.3%, p = 0.04).ConclusionOur results with both resistance gene and phenotypic antibiotic susceptibility results demonstrated that treatment based upon rapid and sensitive M-PCR/P-AST resulted in reduction rather than induction of antibiotic resistance in symptomatic patients with suspected complicated UTI (cUTI) in an urology setting, indicating this type of test is valuable in the management of these types of patients. Further studies of the causes of gene reduction, including elimination of ABR gene-carrying bacteria and loss of ABR gene(s), are warranted.

Background Randomized controlled trials found beneficial effects of inhaled triple therapy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and high risk of exacerbations. We studied whether such effects could also be detected in patients under continuous treatment in an observational, real-life setting.

Pembuatan rumah susun saat ini dipandang sebagai salah satu penyelesaian terbaik untuk masalah perumahan. khususnya kota besar, pertumbuhan penduduk apabila tidak diimbangi dengan pengadaan perumahan yang memadai akan berpengaruh buruk pada lingkungan dan menimbulkan dampak masalah sosial. Pengadaan perumahan bagi masyarakat menengah ke atas dapat mudah terselesaikan, dengan kemampuan ekonominya mereka dapat memperlengakpi kebutuhannya sendiri. Tetapi bagi golongan berpenghasilan rendah yang tidak mampu membeli rumah meskipun ' rumah sangat sederhana ' membutuhkan upaya penyelesaian khusus, salah satu adalah cara sewa dengan subsidi dari pemerintah. Rumah susun yang sekedar dibuat dengan biaya serendah mungkin tanpa memperhatikan aspek sosial dan kebutuhan mendasar calon penghuninya dapat menyebabkan kegagalan saat beroperasional. Dengan mengevaluasi lebih dahulu aspek-aspek yang berpengaruh misalnya: luas hunian yang layak diperlukan, kebutuhan ruang utama, bahan material yang dipakai, fasilitas yang perlu disediakan bagi calon penghuni sebelum melakukan perancangan akan membantu penyelesaian masalah yang akan terjadi dan merupakan kunci berhasilnya pengadaan rumah susun. Ada banyak rumah susun yang selesai dibuat tetapi calon penghuni enggan menempatinya, ini disebabkan selain harga masih belum terjangkau juga disebabkan karena tidak sesuai dengan masalah sosial calon penghuni, padahal mereka yang membutuhkan hunian jumlahnya besar. Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui kebutuhan dan faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh pada penghuni dan konsep dasar perancangan, hasil penelitian akan menjadi masukan dan sumber data realitas bagi tahapan lanjutan nantinya yaitu pengembangan disain arsitektural yang perlu dilakukan sebagai gambar kerja untuk pedoman pelaksanaan pembangunan.