- Research Article
1
- 10.1097/sla.0000000000006976
The CONVERSION Study: Open Conversion Risk in Robotic vs Laparoscopic Surgery-A 20-Year Meta-analysis.
- Nov 14, 2025
- Annals of surgery
- Antonio Gangemi + 8 more +8
To compare the rate of conversion to open surgery (OC) between robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) and laparoscopy (LAP) across 15 abdominal procedures. OC worsens outcomes and costs; a cross-disciplinary estimate of OC risk in RAS versus LAP across general surgery and subspecialties has been lacking. PRISMA-guided systematic review (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus; 2000-2023). Primary endpoint: pooled random-effects odds ratio (OR) for OC (RAS vs LAP) with 95% CIs; heterogeneity quantified by I² and τ². Meta-regression tested age, BMI, and sex. 360 studies (14 RCTs, 36 prospective, 310 retrospective; 211,078 RAS and 1,358,201 LAP) from 30 countries met inclusion. RAS had lower pooled odds of OC than LAP across procedures and study types. Meta-regression showed no significant effect of age, BMI, or sex on OC. Heterogeneity was moderate-to-high overall and varied by procedure (full metrics and forest plots in SDC, http://links.lww.com/SLA/F670). Across diverse abdominal procedures, RAS is associated with lower OC risk. Findings support multi-specialty decision-making, while acknowledging heterogeneity, learning-curve effects, and procedure-specific evidence gaps.
Read more