Harlem United

BackgroundAs part of an initiative to increase COVID-19 testing uptake among underserved populations, we conducted focus groups to explore experiences and attitudes related to testing in two understudied groups—young adults and socially-isolated older adults—recruited from residents living in New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) public housing developments.Materials and methodsIn June through November 2022, we conducted eight virtual focus groups with 21 young adults and 11 older adults living in NYCHA (n = 32 total). To identify themes, we conducted a rapid qualitative analysis approach.ResultsResidents discussed four overarching themes: (1) trusted COVID-19 information sources; (2) reasons for testing; (3) barriers to testing, and (4) strategies to increase testing uptake. Findings were similar across the two age groups; both cited multiple sources of information, including major media outlets, government or public health officials, and doctors. Young adults were more likely to access information from social media despite concerns about misinformation. Participants identified several barriers to testing, such as long lines, insurance coverage, and cost. Young adults reported that at-home COVID testing was more convenient, while older adults expressed concern about accuracy and administering the tests themselves. Recommendations for improving testing emphasized easier access via a central well-known location, in-home visits, free or low-cost tests, and increased outreach.ConclusionMainstream media, doctors and public agencies remain the most trusted sources of information among younger and older residents alike. Many resident recommendations involved leveraging NYCHA infrastructure, highlighting the continuing role public housing authorities can play in COVID-19 and other health initiatives.

This study examined the prevalence of mental health concerns and its association with COVID-19, selected social determinants of health, and psychosocial risk factors in a predominantly racial/ethnic minoritized neighborhood in New York City. Adult Harlem residents (N = 393) completed an online cross-sectional survey from April to September 2021. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-4) and the Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PC-PTSD) were used to evaluate mental health concerns. Poisson regression with robust variance quantified the associations of interests via prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Two-thirds (66.4%) of theresidents reported experiencing mental health concerns, including PTSD (25.7%), depression (41.2%), and anxiety (48.1%). Residents with low-income housing status (PR = 1.16; 95% CI 1.01, 1.34), alcohol misuse (PR = 1.68; 95% CI 1.40, 2.01), food insecurity (PR = 1.23; 95% CI 1.07, 1.42), exposure to interpersonal violence (PR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.08, 2.65), and experience of discrimination (PR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.23-1.92) were more likely to report mental health concerns. Better community perception of the police (PR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95, 0.99) was associated with fewer mental health concerns. No associations were observed for employment insecurity, housing insecurity, or household COVID-19 positivity with mental health concerns. This study showed a high prevalence of mental health concerns in a low-income racial/ethnic minoritized community, where COVID-19 and social risk factors compounded these concerns. Harlem residents face mental health risks including increased financial precarity, interpersonal violence, and discrimination exposure. Interventions are needed to address these concurrent mental health and psychosocial risk factors, particularly in racial/ethnic minoritized residents.

With 1 in 3 women affected, accounting for one billion women worldwide, Violence Against Women (VAW) constitutes one of the widest reaching human rights violations globally. Although the forms they take may vary, these abuses are not confined to a single social class, geographic region, or culture. Existing studies have yet to describe the full burden of abuse that asylum-seeking women endure throughout their lifetimes. We describe a novel coding tool that classifies types of abuse, identifies abuse perpetrators, and estimates how long and how often each abuse was experienced. The authors used this tool to describe and categorize the abuses endured by 85 cisgender, adult women seeking asylum in the United States who presented to the Weill Cornell Center for Human Rights for forensic medical evaluations from 2013 to 2017. We reviewed a total of 180 legal and forensic medical affidavits that were written in support of the applicants’ asylum claims. Using the coding tool, we identified each abuse, classified every perpetrator, and, whenever possible, estimated how long and how frequently each abuse was endured. Interpretations of the raw data contained in this article and a discussion of their significance can be found in our associated publication: “Gender-Based Violence experienced by Women Seeking Asylum in the United State: A Lifetime of Multiple Traumas Inflicted by Multiple Perpetrators” [1]. The coding instrument described herein characterizes VAW by classifying the narrative data that are included in interviews, focus groups, medical records, and the like. Our coding instrument is the first of its kind to describe all types and severities of violence endured by women, classify the perpetrators of that violence, and delineate the timeline of violence over each individual's life. We hope that this holistic approach to classifying and describing VAW will enable other research groups to examine untested or unrealized associations between victims, perpetrators, and abuses. Ultimately, obtaining more complete data will empower us to advocate more effectively and to design more comprehensive care for victims of VAW.

Background: Unit-Specific influences may determine the amount of sedation given to patients and lead to deviations in patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes due to vague guidelines (4). This study aims to compare medication utilization, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction in order to determine safety and efficacy of nurse administrated conscious sedation. Methods: Data from outpatient procedures in Cardiac Catherization Lab (Cath Lab) and Interventional Radiology (IR) departments were collected including comorbidities, labs, procedural characteristics, clinical outcomes, and post-sedation questionnaires. Results: Mean age was 63 ± 14 years and 124 (54.9%) were males. Cath Lab n=132 and IR n=94. Procedure duration(min) was found to be longer in the Cath Lab 55 (37,81), than in IR 24 (16,45), p-value of <0.001. The American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores of Cath Lab 26(21%), IR 29(30.9%), p-value (0.1). Total amount of versed (mg) given in the Cath Lab 2 (1,2), significantly less than IR 3 (1,4.5) with a p-value of <0.01. Total amount of fentanyl (mcg) for Cath Lab 50(50,100), and IR 100 (50,100) with a p-value of <0.01. Median time between 1 st and 2 nd dose of versed in Cath Lab 0 (0,1), IR 9 (5, 16). Median time between 2 nd and 3 rd dose of versed for Cath Lab 0 (0,0), IR 6 (0,13.5) with a p-value <0.001. Median time between 1 st and 2 nd dose of fentanyl in Cath Lab 1 (0,14.8), IR 12.5 (6.8, 24) with a p-value <0.001. Median time between 2 nd and 3 rd dose of fentanyl for Cath Lab 0 (0,0), IR 0,(0,15), p-value <0.001. Median second dose of versed in Cath Lab 0 (0,1), IR 1 (1,1). Median second dose of fentanyl in Cath Lab 25 0 (0,25), IR 25 (25,50), p-value <0.001. Post-Sedation Questionnaire completed by 57 patients, Cath Lab n=30, IR n=27. Patients that felt uncomfortable during their procedure in Cath Lab 11(36.7%), compared to IR 1 (3.7%). The choice of sedation that patient would choose if undergoing a similar procedure again if under general anesthesia Cath Lab 6(20%), IR 0(0%), p-value 0.03. Patients stated that they would recommend conscious sedation to others based on their previous experience, Cath Lab 24 (80%), IR 27(100%). Conclusion: Patients receiving conscious sedation while undergoing procedures in both the Cath Lab and IR were found to have no adverse outcomes and were considered safe. The procedural duration of catheterization procedures was significantly longer than IR with no adverse outcomes, but patients in the Cath lab received less sedation medication and were found to be less satisfied with their procedure. Patients from Cath Lab received less initial sedation medication and rarely received an additional dose. Cath Lab patients were more likely to not recommended conscious sedation to others (20%), and 6 (20%) stated they would rather undergo a similar procedure under general anesthesia; 36.7% of Cath Lab patients stated that they were uncomfortable during the procedure.

Atrial myxoma is one of the most common primary cardiac tumors reported in the literature. In very rare instances, stroke has been the sequelae after a myxomatous tumor resection. We report this unique case of late ischemic cerebral event in a 46-year-old female some days after resection of a left atrial myxoma.