Curriculum Management and Governance Structure ♦ The present structure (Figure 1) evolved since 2005. It was developed to support a comprehensive redesign of the curriculum.FIGURE 1:: Curriculum Structure♦ The Medical Curriculum Committee (MDCC), the membership of which is meant to represent the diversity of stakeholders, is responsible for approving all curriculum changes. It is the core curriculum redesign group. ♦ The group is presently organized into subdivisions (working groups) that are responsible for the redesign of the clinical curriculum (e.g., content, the learning environment, assessment, and so on). Working group leaders are members of the MDCC. Working group membership extends well beyond the MDCC roster. ♦ Separate infrastructure exists to support implementation of the preclinical curriculum, the clinical curriculum, and the Scholarly Concentrations Program. Office of Education ♦ The MDCC is responsible for the curriculum and the entire four-year educational program. It is a standing committee. There is a subcommittee for Years 1 and 2 and a subcommittee for Years 3 and 4. ♦ The Office of Curriculum Affairs is responsible for implementing, maintaining, and improving the medical educational program. ♦ There currently are several medical educators within the office of Curriculum Affairs (OCA): Director of the OCA; Director for the Preclinical Curriculum and Associate Director for the Preclinical Curriculum (Year 2); Director for the Clinical Curriculum. ♦ The OCA schedules preclinical classes, develops curriculum materials, and evaluates the effectiveness of preclinical courses and core clerkships. It also administers student peer tutoring programs involving upper-class students advising and mentoring first-year students. The OCA provides administrative support to the MDCC and to its subcommittees and working groups. Financial Management of Educational Programs ♦ Through debt restructuring, Alpert Medical School was able to redirect operating funds. This allowed the institution to absorb a reduction in endowment-derived revenue and create an additional investment in financial aid. These steps, in combination with an increase in NIH/NSF funding, have helped mitigate the impact of the current financial crisis on the operations of the medical school. ♦ Thus, we have been able to move forward with curriculum development and a new medical education building while enhancing student financial aid during this time of financial stress. Valuing Teaching ♦ Although the Medical School does not have an academy or institute for faculty, the OCA organizes faculty-development workshops and seminars. ♦ Faculty promotion along all tracks requires a demonstration of excellence in teaching. However, this is particularly true for the Teacher Scholar and Clinician Educator tracks within the medical school. ♦ The promotion of teaching among medical students is accomplished through a student teaching academy within Doctoring. Exceptional students assume a formal teaching role for their junior colleagues. Curriculum Renewal Process ♦ A comprehensive redesign of the curriculum was launched at the start of the 2005-06 academic year with the implementation of Doctoring, a Year 1–2 course that focuses on clinical skills and professionalism. A new, integrated preclinical science curriculum was implemented during the fall of 2006. In 2008, with the slightly foreshortened Year 1–2 curriculum in place, the process of redesigning the Year 3–4 curriculum began. ♦ Some key objectives for the curriculum renewal have been achieved. Those include the integration of instruction of the medical sciences among scientific disciplines and with Doctoring; development of Doctoring (http://med.brown.edu/education/doctoring.html) as a new course to prepare students for the clinical disciplines; and development of the Scholarly Concentrations Program (http://med.brown.edu/education/concentrations/index.php) as a means to promote scholarship during all phases of the medical curriculum. ♦ The current process to redesign the curriculum for Years 3–4 is working from a paradigm in which students will complete all core clerkships and nearly all core requirements during Year 3. This will allow us to individualize student learning during Year 4 through the institution of a rigorous educational plan that a student may undertake only with approval through an advisory process. Learning Outcomes/Competencies ♦ The learning outcomes that constitute goals for the ongoing curriculum redesign are articulated in a document developed by the MDCC. Our overarching goal for the redesigned curriculum is to prepare students to meet the needs of their patients, families, and communities and stand out as exceptional physician leaders at the graduate medical education level and beyond. To reach this goal, we will develop a clinical curriculum that builds on the Brown tradition of liberal education, self-directed learning, and excellence in medical education. It will provide the experiences, knowledge and skills that are deemed so important that every Brown medical student should have them prior to graduation, irrespective of their individual trajectory. It will also be flexible so as to enable students to self-direct their learning to suit their particular career goals. We have also identified qualities that we aspire to imbue in our graduates. These would include but not be restricted to: The ability to function as a self-directed life-long learner, contributing to advances in medical knowledge, therapeutics and technology, and the ability to adapt to advances in health care in the interest of their patients and communities; the capacity to be a fully informed participant in assuring high quality health care in their practices, institutions and communities; and the commitment to be ethical, socially responsible physicians and leaders in all aspect of their work. ♦ Throughout the curriculum renewal process, we have retained Brown's Nine Abilities (Table 1) as the competencies that inform our decisions and constitute the basis for assessing our students.TABLE 1: The Nine Abilities New Topics in the Curriculum Since 2000 ♦ Patient safety: Addressed in Doctoring (Years 1 and 2; written documentation, including the appropriate use of abbreviations; prescription writing; truth telling and medical errors). In addition, there is an interdisciplinary session (includes nursing and pharmacy students) in Year 2 that is focused on team building. Relevant problem-based learning sessions in the Internal Medicine core clerkship also address this issue. ♦ In addition to the session described earlier, team-based exercises are incorporated into the Ob/Gyn Core Clerkship (episiotomy workshops and group needle handling/suture workshops). Work rounds in Internal Medicine and Pediatrics include health care professionals from nursing, nutrition, physical therapy, respiratory therapy, and pharmacy. ♦ Quality improvement is a core subject in our Community Health Clerkship. New interviewing skill topics: The ethnogeriatric interview; assessment of pain; caring for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients; screening for interpersonal violence Motivational interviewing skills: Smoking cessation counseling; alcohol and drug abuse counseling; nutrition and physical activity counseling for overweight adults Writing skills: Doctoring incorporates sessions on written documentation; the broader subjects of writing in medicine (the physician as communicator) and reflective writing are also required components of Doctoring Professionalism and ethics: Learning in the clinical setting; professional boundaries; dual relationships; physicians' relationship with industry; truth telling and medical errors; informed consent; advanced directives Cultural competence: Social determinants of health; cultural humility versus cultural competence; cross-cultural communication; working with interpreters Changes in Pedagogy ♦ The school developed and implemented an integrated, coordinated interdisciplinary preclinical curriculum that incorporates all basic science subject areas and Doctoring. ♦ Doctoring replaced what had been separate and distinct courses in history taking and physical diagnosis. The new course, which is two years in duration, uses a combination of didactic sessions (brief gatherings in a lecture setting followed by small-group breakout sessions), hospital sessions, and community mentoring (described later). ♦ Basic science content delivered in lectures is presented to a very large degree by physician scientists. This shift away from graduate education (PhD)-trained basic scientists was made in order to maximize the integration of basic science and clinical content. For example, the systems-based portion of our curriculum integrates physiology, pathophysiology, pathology, pharmacology, and other relevant areas (e.g., epidemiology and nutrition). We had developed extensive problem-based learning prior to 2000. This has been retained. ♦ An Assisted Living Facility experience was introduced into our first-year Doctoring course. This is a longitudinal component that provides a robust experience in geriatrics. Small groups of two faculty and eight students are matched to one of 13 sites in Rhode Island for a year. Each student works with one resident over the entire year. The effectiveness of this curriculum addition has not yet been assessed. ♦ The effectiveness of the new curriculum is determined by student course evaluations; student focus groups; and feedback from course leaders and medical school administrators. Also analyzed are students' overall grades and USMLE Step 1 performance. ♦ The effectiveness of the Doctoring course is more specifically assessed through an analysis of student course evaluations, small-group faculty feedback, and physician-mentors' written assessments. Periodically, the clerkship directors and clerkship faculty are surveyed for their views of the beginning third-year students' level of preparation for the clerkships. Changes in Assessment ♦ Assessment of the knowledge base acquired through first-year basic science courses is carried out through integrated, noncumulative, timed, single-best-answer multiple-choice examinations given every three to four weeks. In our prior system, students took first-year basic science examinations during midterm and final examination blocks. ♦ Doctoring incorporates an OSCE at the end of each semester. These examinations assess the level of clinical competence of preclinical students. The use of field notes in Doctoring requires that students self-reflect on their clinical experiences in physician-mentors' offices. Clinical Experiences ♦ Hospital-based clinical education takes place at our seven affiliates (http://med.brown.edu/hospitals/hospitals.php). These include the Rhode Island Hospital, with 719 beds, and Women and Infants' Hospital of Rhode Island, home to the tenth largest obstetrical service in the country. ♦ Community faculty are the backbone of the “Community Mentor Program,” a component of the preclerkship Doctoring course. Students work longitudinally during the year with a community physician-mentor. Physicians in all specialties provide students with the opportunity to practice their classroom skills with real patients. Community faculty also provide for outpatient teaching in the core clerkships in internal medicine, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and family medicine. ♦ The financial pressures on our affiliated clinical institutions and community practitioners have a potential impact on the availability of teaching resources. Thus far, the relatively small size of our student body, coupled with the large clinical enterprise and clinical faculty, has protected the quality of our clinical education. However, this issue is a substantial and immediate threat. ♦ For reasons that appear to relate to the financing of health care and student indebtedness and lifestyle issues, our students are entering primary care disciplines at a relatively low rate. In addition, the majority of our students who undertake postgraduate training in primary care disciplines intend to pursue specialty training. Highlights of the Program ♦ A new integrated preclinical curriculum was launched in 2006. Students take two courses per semester for each of the first four semesters: Integrated Medical Sciences: Begins with a semester of gross anatomy, microscopic anatomy, cell biology, biochemistry, genetics, general pathology, and other basic medical sciences, all covered at the introductory level. This first semester is followed by three semesters of systems-based medical science instruction, which includes physiology, pathophysiology, pathology and relevant pharmacology, nutrition, epidemiology, and genetics. Doctoring: A four-semester course that focuses on the doctor-patient relationship, fundamental clinical skills, and professionalism. This course incorporates a “community mentor program” that affords students the opportunity to work with an individual physician through all four semesters and a strong reflective writing component. ♦ Scholarly Concentrations Program: Launched in academic year (AY) 2007 during a reform of the preclinical curriculum, the Scholarly Concentrations (SC) Program at AMS is an elective program that encourages students to undertake cross-disciplinary scholarly work across the 4 years of medical education. ♦ Approximately one third of students in each class participate in the program, which requires the submission of a scholarly product in Year IV. The SC Program offers 12 concentration areas: Advocacy and Activism; Aging; Contemplative Studies; Disaster Medicine and Response; Global Health; Informatics; Medical Education; Medical Ethics; Medical Humanities; Medical Technology and Innovation; Physician as Communicator; and Women's Reproductive Health, Freedom and Rights. The SC Program will graduate its first class of participants in AY2010. ♦ An outgrowth of the SC Program is the SC Collaborative. The Collaborative is a group of approximately 35 institutions across North America that have, or are considering implementation of, scholarly concentration-type programs. Members of the group have gathered annually at the AAMC meeting for the past three years and communicate electronically to share best practices. ♦ In 2009, members of the group facilitated two sessions at the AAMC meeting—a mini-workshop entitled “Skill Building for Scholarly Concentrations Programs” and a small-group discussion entitled “The Development of Scholarly Concentrations Programs: Strategies for Implementation and Integration into the Curriculum.” ♦ Recently, we have implemented a new series of lectures and workshops aimed at improving the ability of all medical students to accomplish scholarly work. ♦ The “Scholarship in Medicine” series, cosponsored by the SC Program and the Advising Program, has sponsored such talks as “Internal Review Board Processes,” “Poster Presentations—Tips on creating and presenting your work,” and “Oral Presentations—Tips on creating and presenting Power Point talks.” ♦ Future sessions on manuscript writing, critical reading of the literature, and mentorship are also being developed.
Read more