IDEAconsult

Abstract Firms are known to commonly imitate peers' foreign investment location choices. We shed further light on this phenomenon by exploring the role of foreign locations' cultural tightness, which refers to the prevalence of social norms in a location and the tolerance for deviance from them. Combining institutional theory with insights from research on cultural tightness, we hypothesize that firms are more strongly inclined to imitate peers' choice for a subnational foreign investment location when the location is culturally tighter. Our hypothesis receives consistent support in conditional logit analyses based on 2900 foreign investments in new manufacturing plants in US metropolitan areas over the period 2008–2019. Furthermore, the amplifying effect of a subnational location's cultural tightness on firms' propensity to imitate their peers' choice for the location seems to depend on firms' experience with cultural tightness and their home country's cultural distance from the USA. Our findings enrich international management research on location choice imitation, legitimacy risks, and cultural tightness.

Genotoxicity testing for nanomaterials remains challenging as standard testing approaches require some adaptation, and further development of nano-specific OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) and Guidance Documents (GDs) are needed. However, the field of genotoxicology continues to progress and new approach methodologies (NAMs) are being developed that could provide relevant information on the range of mechanisms of genotoxic action that may be imparted by nanomaterials. There is a recognition of the need for implementation of new and/or adapted OECD TGs, new OECD GDs, and utilization of NAMs within a genotoxicity testing framework for nanomaterials. As such, the requirements to apply new experimental approaches and data for genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials in a regulatory context is neither clear, nor used in practice. Thus, an international workshop with representatives from regulatory agencies, industry, government, and academic scientists was convened to discuss these issues. The expert discussion highlighted the current deficiencies that exist in standard testing approaches within exposure regimes, insufficient physicochemical characterization, lack of demonstration of cell or tissue uptake and internalization, and limitations in the coverage of genotoxic modes of action. Regarding the latter aspect, a consensus was reached on the importance of using NAMs to support the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials. Also highlighted was the need for close engagement between scientists and regulators to (i) provide clarity on the regulatory needs, (ii) improve the acceptance and use of NAM-generated data, and (iii) define how NAMs may be used as part of weight of evidence approaches for use in regulatory risk assessments.

Abstract Industry develops increasingly complex and advanced materials while incorporating the Safe-by-Design (SbD) concept into the R&D goals. Within HARMLESS (EU H2020), we use concepts of similarity for the risk screening during the SbD iterations. We rely predominantly on Novel Approach Methodologies (NAMs) due to ethical reasons, speed and parallel testing of several SbD versions. In general, aerosolization of nanostructured materials leading to inhalation of respirable fraction is considered one of the most important routes of exposure. Depending on the physicochemical properties of the materials, MCNM may either dissolve or persist within the lung. We selected in chimico NAMs (i.e., biodissolution in lung simulant fluids and surface reactivity assay) to understand how the properties of six different perovskites, intended to be used in the automotive catalysis sector, are connected to inhalation hazard endpoints. They all share a common concern: Co and Ni (heavy metals) in the structure. We found that the composition and surface properties play an important role in determining the particles fate upon inhalation, influencing metals bioavailability and the induced oxidative damage. At pH 7.5 and 4.5 simulant fluids, both relevant for pulmonary clearance, dissolution depended minimally on the noble metal doping but rather on the %weight of heavy metal in the structure. Furthermore, high surface reactivity was observed for all perovskites. Interestingly, the induced oxidative damage was correlating with the Ni %weight, surface thickness and Ni oxidation state. The results allowed us to rank different SbD versions against benchmarks, providing Safe-by-Design guidance on multicomponent, heavy metals-containing perovskites.

Data models for representation of chemicals are at the core of cheminformatics processing workflows. The standard triple, (structure, properties, and descriptors), traditionally formalizes a molecule and has been the dominant paradigm for several decades. While this approach is useful and widely adopted from academia, the regulatory bodies and industry have complex use cases and impose the concept of chemical substances applied for multicomponent, advanced, and nanomaterials. Chemical substance data model is an extension of the molecule representation and takes into account the practical aspects of chemical data management, emerging research challenges and discussions within academia, industry, and regulators. The substance paradigm must handle a composition of multiple components. Mandatory metadata is packed together with the experimental and theoretical data. Data model elucidation poses challenges regarding metadata, ontology utilization, and adoption of FAIR principles. We illustrate the adoption of these good practices by means of the Ambit/eNanoMapper data model, which is applied for chemical substances originating from ECHA REACH dossiers and for largest nanosafety database in Europe. The Ambit/eNanoMapper model allows development of tools for data curation, FAIRification of large collections of nanosafety data, ontology annotation, data conversion to standards such as JSON, RDF, and HDF5, and emerging linear notations for chemical substances.

Nanoscience as a key enabling technology will be fundamental to address several of the current global challenges. Developing safe and sustainable solutions requires high quality data and appropriate analysis approaches. Therefore, implementation of the Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability and Reusability (FAIR) principles within the nanosafety community is key to achieve this and the main goal of the AdvancedNano GO FAIR Implementation Network. Here we highlight the activities of the network to support the nanosafety community in achieving this goal under the overarching aim of maximizing both safe and sustainable application of nano- and advanced materials.

A substance may have one or more nanoforms, defined for regulatory purposes under EU chemicals legislation REACH based on differences in physicochemical properties such as size, shape, specific surface area and surface chemistry including coatings. To reduce the burden of testing each unique nanoform for the environmental risk assessment of nanomaterials, grouping approaches allow simultaneous assessment of multiple nanoforms. Nanoforms with initially different intrinsic properties, could still be considered similar if their environmental fate and effects can be demonstrated to be similar. One hypothesis to group nanoforms with different organic surface modifications is to use parameters linked to biodegradation of the organic surface. The hypothesis contends that nanoforms with a similar core chemistry, but different organic surface treatments may be grouped, if the surface treatment is likely to be lost through biodegradation rapidly upon entering an environmental compartment, such that it no longer modulates fate, exposure and toxicity of the nanoform.To implement grouping according to surface treatment biodegradability, a robust approach to measure the breakdown of particle surface treatments is needed. We present a tiered testing strategy to assess the biodegradation of organic surface treatments used with nanomaterials that can be implemented as part of an Integrated Approach to Testing and Assessment (IATA) for grouping based on surface treatment stability. The tiered approach consists of an initial pre-screening MT2 colorimetric carbon substrate utilisation assay, to provide a rapid assessment of coating degradation, and a second tier of testing using OECD Test Guideline 301F for assessing organic chemical biodegradability. Six common surface treatment substances are assessed using the tiered testing strategy to refine rules for escalating between tiers. Similarity assessment using absolute Euclidean distances and x-fold difference concluded that the Tier 1 assessment can be used as conservative binary screening for biodegradability (no false positive results in Tier 1), whilst for substances showing intermediate biodegradation (10–60% in OECD 301F, Tier 2), similarity assessments can be informative for grouping surface treatments not considered readily biodegradable. Further validation using higher tier tests (e.g., mesocosms) is needed to define acceptable limits of similarity between intermediately biodegradable substances, where differences in biodegradability of the surface coating lead to negligible differences in fate, behaviour and toxicity of the nanoforms, and this is critically discussed.

For a concerted action to dovetail FAIR data and services in nanosafety.

Nanotechnologies have reached maturity and market penetration that require nano-specific changes in legislation and harmonization among legislation domains, such as the amendments to REACH for nanomaterials (NMs) which came into force in 2020. Thus, an assessment of the components and regulatory boundaries of NMs risk governance is timely, alongside related methods and tools, as part of the global efforts to optimise nanosafety and integrate it into product design processes, via Safe(r)-by-Design (SbD) concepts. This paper provides an overview of the state-of-the-art regarding risk governance of NMs and lays out the theoretical basis for the development and implementation of an effective, trustworthy and transparent risk governance framework for NMs. The proposed framework enables continuous integration of the evolving state of the science, leverages best practice from contiguous disciplines and facilitates responsive re-thinking of nanosafety governance to meet future needs. To achieve and operationalise such framework, a science-based Risk Governance Council (RGC) for NMs is being developed. The framework will provide a toolkit for independent NMs' risk governance and integrates needs and views of stakeholders. An extension of this framework to relevant advanced materials and emerging technologies is also envisaged, in view of future foundations of risk research in Europe and globally.