Idorsia (Switzerland)

Introduction of complement (C) inhibition into clinical practice has revolutionized the treatment of patients with complement-mediated atypical hemolytic syndrome (aHUS). Our C3D1115N mouse model, engineered around a gain of function point mutation in C3, is associated with complement mediated aHUS in man, allowing us to study the clinical disease in a preclinical model. Backcrossing our model onto C7 deficient and C5aR1 deficient mice enabled further determination of the roles of the C5a-C5aR1 axis and C5b-9 (the membrane attack complex) on kidney disease. C7 deficiency completely abolished both clinical and histological evidence of disease. Removing C5aR1 (CD88) attenuated the risk of developing clinical disease, but mice still developed thrombotic microangiopathy. Therapeutic inhibition strengthened our genetic findings showing both anti-C7 therapy and an oral C5aR1 antagonist, when used before evidence of significant kidney injury, prevented mice from succumbing to disease. However, there was ongoing histological disease within mice treated with the C5aR1 antagonist. Our data suggest that both C5aR1 and C7 play a role in the development of the conditions required for thrombotic microangiopathy of the kidney. While disrupting the C5a-C5aR1 axis is beneficial, our genetic and therapeutic studies showed that thrombotic microangiopathy of the kidney can still develop and ultimately our data confirm that the membrane attack complex is required to develop thrombotic microangiopathy of the kidney. Overall, our study shows that in addition to requiring alternative pathway dysregulation, local generation of membrane attack complex within the kidney is also critical to drive disease pathology in complement-mediated aHUS.

The assessment and control of potential mutagenic impurities (PMIs) within pharmaceutical products are managed in accordance with the ICH M7 guideline “Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk”. This guidance highlights four control options that can be used to give assurance of control of PMIs to below a level of toxicological concern for the intended use. These control options range from testing to confirm that impurity levels within the active pharmaceutical ingredient or product are below an acceptable limit (ICH M7 Option 1 Control) to a control strategy that relies on process controls and scientific principles (e.g., purging) to demonstrate impurity presence to below a level of concern in lieu of analytical testing (option 4). While ICH M7 control option 4 is an established approach to justify that levels of a potential mutagenic impurity are below an acceptable limit, there have been health authority challenges that the use of ICH M7 control option 4 rationales is not appropriate for N-nitrosamines without included confirmatory analytical testing data to confirm absence. The reasons behind this lack of acceptance for ICH M7 control option 4 alone may include (i) a higher perceived potency for nitrosamines over other mutagenic impurities as they alert as part of the cohort of concern and (ii) inappropriate application of purge rationales such that, in some instances, confirmatory testing data highlighted higher levels for the impurity than had been predicted to be present. Through the inclusion of industry relevant case studies, this publication outlines that, while some nitrosamines may require control to lower levels than the ICH M7 threshold of toxicological concern, the concept of the ICH M7 option 4 control is scientifically justified when the properties for the nitrosamine are considered and an appropriate conservative purge rationale is applied.

Introduction Chronic insomnia disorder (CID) is considered a significant worldwide public health concern; however, its exact burden is unknown. We estimate its prevalence across France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom, and assess the economic and humanistic burden for a broader insomnia population. Methods This retrospective, cross-sectional, observational study used 2020 National Health and Wellness Survey (NHWS) data. Patients reporting insomnia were characterized to define CID. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL), work productivity, and healthcare resource use (HCRU) outcomes were assessed in four cohorts according to insomnia diagnosis and treatment status and examined using multivariable analyses according to Insomnia Severity Index categories. Results Among 62,319 respondents, 9,035 (21.2%) reported experiencing insomnia over the previous 12 months. CID prevalence rates were 5.5% to 6.7% across the five countries and 6.0% overall. HRQoL outcomes were persistently poorer in cohorts of patients diagnosed with insomnia than those with undiagnosed insomnia. Undiagnosed and treated insomnia patients reported the highest work presenteeism and total work productivity impairment and the highest number of emergency room and hospitalization visits than patients with insomnia (either treated or untreated). After adjusting for covariates, patients with severe insomnia reported significantly worse EQ-5D-5L utility scores, higher absenteeism and presenteeism rates, and more healthcare provider visits over the past 6 months than patients without insomnia (all p < 0.01). Conclusions Our prevalence rates for CID align with published literature. A diagnosis of insomnia, use of sleep medications, and severity of insomnia are associated with poor quality of life, loss of work productivity, and higher HCRU, confirming the high unmet need and substantial humanistic and economic burden of CID.

The purpose of this overview was to perform an exploratory analysis of in-house drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies conducted with investigational drugs and oral midazolam to assess the value of measuring 1-OH-midazolam (1-OHM) in such studies. The perpetrator effect of the investigational drugs on cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) was assessed by analyzing both midazolam and 1-OHM in plasma and evaluating their pharmacokinetic parameters. Given the almost exclusive metabolism of the parent drug by CYP3A to the main metabolite 1-OHM, an increase in midazolam and a decrease in 1-OHM exposure in the case of CYP3A inhibition caused by a perpetrator drug would be expected. The opposite would be anticipated in the case of CYP3A induction. For this analysis, the perpetrator potential of eight different investigational drugs was incorporated. Among the 10 studies included, the identified CYP3A inhibitors (n = 4) and inducers (n = 1) were classified based on the data generated with midazolam per se, with 1-OHM levels not contributing to the interpretation of the data as they did not corroborate the findings of the parent compound. Therefore, it was concluded that continued analysis of 1-OHM in plasma may be questionable as it does not add value to the interpretation of the results when performing CYP3A DDI studies with an investigational drug as a perpetrator.

ABSTRACT Objectives Appraise the evidence for daridorexant 50 mg and 25 mg versus placebo when treating chronic insomnia disorder in terms of number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH). Methods NNT, NNH, and LHH were calculated from a 3-month pivotal Phase 3 study (N = 930; randomized 1:1:1 to daridorexant 50 mg, daridorexant 25 mg, or placebo once nightly). Wakefulness after sleep onset, latency to persistent sleep, self-reported total sleep time, Insomnia Daytime Symptoms and Impacts Questionnaire (IDSIQ), and Insomnia Severity Index were used for the NNT efficacy analysis. NNH safety analysis was performed using rates of adverse events (AEs) occurring in >1% of the participants in any arm. LHH was assessed for all NNT estimates, contrasting them with NNH estimates for somnolence, headache, and fatigue AEs. Results NNT estimates for daridorexant 50 mg versus placebo were <10 for clinically meaningful thresholds across all outcomes. NNT estimates for daridorexant 25 mg versus placebo were not as robust as those observed for daridorexant 50 mg, with many values exceeding 10. NNH estimates for daridorexant 50 mg and 25 mg versus placebo did not show a statistically significant treatment difference except for falls, where NNH was negative for the daridorexant 50 mg group (−44 [95% CI −328; −21]; rate of falls was greater with placebo than for daridorexant 50 mg). All LHH ratios at Months 1 and 3 were >1 (except for daridorexant 25 mg for the IDSIQ alert/cognition domain), indicating that patients were more likely to respond to daridorexant 50 mg and 25 mg than to experience an AE of somnolence, headache, or fatigue. Conclusion Daridorexant 50 mg and 25 mg have a favorable benefit–risk ratio over 3 months. Daridorexant 50 mg demonstrated more robust (lower) NNT estimates versus placebo than daridorexant 25 mg.

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is one of the leading causes of healthcare-associated infections worldwide. The increasing incidence of strains resistant to currently available therapies highlights the need for alternative treatment options with a novel mode of action. Oxazolidinones that are connected to a quinolone moiety with a pyrrolidine linker, such as compound 1, are reported to exhibit potent broadspectrum antibacterial activity. In an effort to optimize this class of compounds for the treatment of C. difficile infection (CDI), we have identified cadazolid (9), a first-in-class quinoxolidinone antibiotic, which is a potent inhibitor of C. difficile protein synthesis. In order to achieve narrow-spectrum coverage of clinically most relevant strains without affecting the gut microbiota, an emphasis was placed on abolishing activity against commensals of the intestinal microbiome while retaining good coverage of pathogenic C. difficile, including hypervirulent and epidemic strains.