Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis has emerged as a promising adjunct to human ECG interpretation in suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). To expand knowledge in this evolving field, the authors retrospectively analyzed the performance of a novel AI-ECG model in patients with cardiac catheterization laboratory activation for suspected STEMI. Consecutive patients were gathered from a multicenter U.S. STEMI registry (2018-2022) and categorized into 3 clinical cohorts based on the presence or absence of angiographic culprit and troponin elevation: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with culprit, AMI without culprit, and no-AMI. Cardiac catheterization laboratory-activating ECGs were analyzed using an AI-ECG model trained to identify acute coronary occlusion and classified as occlusion myocardial infarction, OMI(+) or not, OMI(-). The study included 2,523 patients, 68.3% male, with a median age of 63 years. AMI with culprit was present in 2076 (82.3%), AMI without culprit in 314 (12.4%), and no-AMI in 133 (5.3%). Among AMI with culprit patients, the model correctly identified 93.8% as OMI(+). Sensitivity for TIMI flow 0/1, 2, and 3 was 96.3%, 93.1%, and 86.9% respectively; P < 0.001. The model correctly identified 79.7% of no-AMI patients as OMI(-). The AUCROC was 0.952 (95% CI: 0.924-0.966). The AMI without culprit cohort included takotsubo syndrome OMI(+) = 78%, MI with nonobstructive coronary arteries OMI(+) = 61%, and myopericarditis OMI(+) = 67%. In suspected STEMI, this AI-ECG model correctly identified nearly all patients with acute coronary obstruction and most of those without AMI. If prospectively validated, this approach could improve management of patients with suspected AMI.

Heart failure (HF) due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains a major clinical challenge, particularly among patients with chronic total occlusions (CTO). CTO are present in up to 30% of patients with LVSD undergoing coronary angiography and are independently associated with worse outcomes. Although advances in interventional techniques have increased success rates of CTO percutaneous coronary intervention (CTO-PCI), high-quality evidence supporting this procedure in patients with LVSD remains limited. Observational studies report potential benefits, including improved survival, alleviation of HF symptoms, and recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have largely excluded patients with LVEF <35% and those with advanced, complex coronary artery disease (CAD), including CTO, thereby restricting generalizability. Assessment of myocardial viability remains central to patient select for CTO-PCI, its prognostic value for hard clinical endpoints has not been definitively established. The use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) during high-risk CTO-PCI is increasing, particularly in patients with reduced LVEF and complex coronary anatomy; available data provides inconsistent evidence regarding its impact on clinical outcomes and appears to be largely influenced by individual patient characteristics. Finally, in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), the effect of CTO revascularization on clinical endpoints and arrhythmic risk is unclear, with conflicting observational data. Future research should prioritize this underrepresented high-risk cohort and be conducted in experienced centers within an integrated multidisciplinary care framework.

Mounting evidence suggests that renin-independent aldosteronism is common and often underrecognized. Yet, whether aldosteronism across this broader spectrum is associated with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) has not, to the authors' knowledge, been comprehensively evaluated. To determine whether aldosterone measures are associated with incident CVD events in community-dwelling older adults. This prospective cohort analysis included participants from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study with serum aldosterone and renin levels measured in 2011 to 2013. Longitudinal analyses were conducted in March to September 2025 using Cox regression to assess associations between aldosterone parameters and incident CVD among participants free of heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and potassium-sparing diuretic use at ARIC visit 5 (2011-2013). Serum aldosterone level and aldosterone-renin ratio (ARR). Incident HF hospitalization, atrial fibrillation (AF), ischemic stroke, MI, and a composite of these events plus all-cause death. Among 3477 individuals free of baseline CVD (mean [SD] age, 74.8 [4.9] years; 2139 female [61.5%]), the median (IQR) aldosterone level was 5.1 (3.0-8.3) ng/dL (to convert to picomoles per liter, multiply by 27.74), renin activity was 0.78 (0.41-1.90) ng/mL per hour, and ARR was 5.9 (2.2-12.3) ng/dL per ng/mL/h. Over 9 years of follow-up, higher ARR was associated with the composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08 per doubling), stroke (aHR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02-1.26), and AF (aHR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) but not with incident HF hospitalization (aHR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.07) or MI (aHR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.92-1.12). The findings of this cohort study underscore a spectrum of primary aldosteronism, in which higher ARR was independently associated with increased risks of AF and ischemic stroke among older adults, supporting the aldosterone pathway as a potential target for CVD prevention.

In the PROACTIVE-HF trial, remote heart failure (HF) management using comprehensive vital signs and seated mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) was safe and resulted in a low reported rate of HF hospitalization (HFH) and all-cause mortality (HFH/D) through 12 months. In this report, we extend the results from the PROACTIVE-HF study through 2 years, stratified by ejection fraction (EF). PROACTIVE-HF was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of patient management using the Cordella PA pressure sensor system in patients with New York Heart Association class III symptoms, regardless of EF. In the first 24 months, the incidence of HF events (HFE)/D was 0.89 (95% CI 0.81-0.99) events per patient, driven by HFH. Patients with HF with reduced EF had greater HFE/D rates than those with HF with preserved EF (1.0 vs 0.8 events per patient, P = .048). For patients with HF experiencing moderate-to-severe symptoms, management using the Cordella PA sensor system was associated with low event rates and improved health status at 2 years, regardless of EF. Comprehensive remote monitoring of vital signs, seated PAP, and patient-reported symptoms via a digital platform supports sustained benefit for high-risk patients with HF.

Drug-coated balloons are the preferred treatment for in-stent restenosis (ISR), avoiding the need for a second metallic layer. While both paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) and limus-coated balloons (LCB, typically sirolimus or biolimus) are used, direct comparative evidence is limited, particularly regarding their long-term angiographic efficacy and clinical safety. We conducted a systematic review and study-level meta-analyzis of studies comparing LCB with PCB for coronary ISR. A comprehensive search was performed across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of science for randomized controlled trials. Outcomes were compared using risk ratios (RR) for categorical data and mean differences for continuous data in a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. Six randomized controlled trials involving 1,038 patients were included (552 in the LCB group and 481 in the PCB group). Compared with PCB, LCB were associated with a significantly higher risk of clinically driven target lesion revascularization (RR: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.02 to 2.14; p = 0.04; I2 = 0%) and target lesion failure (RR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.62; p = 0.27; I2 = 0%). In contrast, both platforms demonstrated no differences in all-cause mortality (RR: 0.98; p = 0.96), myocardial infarction (RR: 0.73; p = 0.46), stent thrombosis (RR: 0.66; p = 0.57), or MACE (RR: 1.09; p = 0.58). Angiographic outcomes were comparable, including late lumen loss (mean differences: -0.00 mm; p = 0.65; I2 = 74.7%) and minimal lumen diameter (mean differences: -0.12 mm; p = 0.07). In patients with ISR, PCB reduced repeat revascularization compared with LCB. These data suggest a modest advantage for PCB in preventing restenosis following drug-coated balloon angioplasty for ISR.