NSABP Foundation

While primary invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is well characterized, metastatic ILC remains understudied. Within the post-mortem tissue donation programs, UPTIDER (Belgium) and Hope for Others (USA), we first aimed to explore intra-patient heterogeneity of key prognostic and predictive markers (stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTIL), estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and KI67). Secondly, we compared detection of the metastases by pathology on autopsy samples versus pre-mortem imaging. In total, 306 metastases from 12 patients were collected at autopsy (median: 27 per patient). Both primary tumors (n = 15) and metastases (n = 232) had low sTIL levels, with a median of 2% (range: 0.67-6.67%) and 0.67% (range: 0-13.33%), respectively. Regression models showed lower ER- and PR-expression in metastases (respectively, n = 265 and n = 64) compared to primary tumors (both p < 0.01). KI67 was significantly higher in metastases (n = 262, p = 0.02). HER2-low metastases were found in all but one patient although in varying proportion of metastases (range: 7.5-100%). Central radiology and pathology review had a median concordance of 78% at organ level (range: 33.33-100%) and 71% at patient level (range: 55.88-85.29%). Our findings suggest that a single metastatic biopsy has great limitations to guide treatment and that more adequate methods are needed to detect and monitor ILC metastases.

TPS256 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (Signatera, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines v serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively, or with serial monitoring (Cohort B), will be randomized to FP+Ox v more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate v delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox v FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Current accrual (as of 9-4-2025): 967/1,912. Drs. Lieu and Dasari contributed equally to the development of this trial. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

BackgroundPatients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive early breast cancer and residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy are at high risk for recurrence.MethodsIn a phase 3, open-label, international, randomized trial, we investigated postneoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; 5.4 mg per kilogram of body weight) as compared with trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1; 3.6 mg per kilogram), the current standard treatment, in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with residual invasive disease and node-positive disease at surgery or inoperable disease at diagnosis. The primary end point was invasive disease–free survival, and the key secondary end point was disease-free survival (including survival free from noninvasive breast cancers and second primary nonbreast cancers). Other end points included overall survival, distant recurrence–free interval, brain metastasis–free interval, and safety.ResultsA total of 1635 patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive T-DXd (818 patients) or T-DM1 (817 patients). At the data-cutoff date, the median duration of follow-up was approximately 30 months in each group. Invasive-disease events or deaths were reported in 51 patients (6.2%) in the T-DXd group and 102 patients (12.5%) in the T-DM1 group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.66; P<0.001); 3-year invasive disease–free survival was 92.4% and 83.7%, respectively. Invasive-disease events, noninvasive-disease events, or deaths were reported in 52 patients (6.4%) in the T-DXd group and 103 patients (12.6%) in the T-DM1 group (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.66; P<0.001); 3-year disease-free survival was 92.3% and 83.5%, respectively. The most common adverse events were nausea (71.3% of patients), constipation (32.0%), decreased neutrophil count (31.6%), and vomiting (31.0%) with T-DXd and increased liver-enzyme levels (aspartate aminotransferase [50.2%] and alanine aminotransferase [45.3%]) and decreased platelet count (49.8%) with T-DM1. The incidence of adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease was higher with T-DXd than with T-DM1 (9.6% vs. 1.6%). Two patients with interstitial lung disease in the T-DXd group died.ConclusionsIn patients with high-risk, residual invasive HER2-positive breast cancer, postneoadjuvant T-DXd resulted in a significantly higher likelihood of invasive disease–free survival than T-DM1; toxic effects were mainly gastrointestinal and hematologic. An important identified risk of T-DXd is interstitial lung disease, which requires appropriate monitoring and management. (Funded by Daiichi Sankyo and AstraZeneca; DESTINY-Breast05 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04622319.)

BackgroundThe benefit of regional nodal irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer is well established for patients with pathologically positive axillary nodes, but whether it is also beneficial for patients whose nodes become pathologically tumor free (ypN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy remains unclear.MethodsWe evaluated whether regional nodal irradiation improves outcomes in patients with biopsy-proven, node-positive breast cancer who reach ypN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with breast cancer with a clinical stage of T1 to T3 (tumor size, ≤2 cm to >5 cm), N1, and M0 (indicating spread to one to three axillary lymph nodes but no distant metastasis) who had ypN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive regional nodal irradiation or no regional nodal irradiation. The primary end point was the interval of freedom from invasive breast cancer recurrence or death from breast cancer (invasive breast cancer recurrence–free interval). Secondary end points included the locoregional recurrence–free interval, the distant recurrence–free interval, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Safety was also assessed.ResultsA total of 1641 patients were enrolled in the trial; 1556 were included in the primary-event analysis: 772 in the irradiation group and 784 in the no-irradiation group. After a median follow-up of 59.5 months, 109 primary end-point events (50 in the irradiation group and 59 in the no-irradiation group) had occurred. Regional nodal irradiation did not significantly increase the invasive breast cancer recurrence–free interval (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 1.28; P=0.51). Point estimates of survival free from the primary end-point events were 92.7% in the irradiation group and 91.8% in the no-irradiation group. Regional nodal irradiation did not increase the locoregional recurrence–free interval, the distant recurrence–free interval, disease-free survival, or overall survival. No deaths related to the protocol-specified therapy were reported, and no unexpected adverse events were observed. Grade 4 adverse events occurred in 0.5% of patients in the irradiation group and 0.1% of those in the no-irradiation group.ConclusionsThe addition of adjuvant regional nodal irradiation did not decrease the risk of invasive breast cancer recurrence or death from breast cancer in patients who had negative axillary nodes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health; NSABP B-51–Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 1304 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01872975.)

Use of modern neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimens has markedly increased rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) in breast cancer, raising the question of whether surgical removal of the primary tumor is required for patients with pCR. For surgery to be omitted, one must be able to accurately predict pCR before surgery. To investigate if adding post-NAC core needle biopsy of the tumor bed to trimodality imaging in patients who have clinical complete response (cCR) will predict pCR (resolution of both invasive disease and ductal carcinoma in situ) in 90% or more cases. This was a phase 2, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial. Patients were enrolled from August 2017 to June 2019. This is the final analysis, which was completed in December 2023. The setting included academic and community hospital center members of NRG (ie, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group, and the Gynecologic Oncology Group) in the US and Canada. Patients with operable (T1-T3, stage I-III) invasive ductal carcinoma who completed NAC and achieved cCR and radiological complete response (rCR) or near rCR by mammography (mass ≤1 cm and no malignant microcalcifications), ultrasound (mass ≤2 cm), and magnetic resonance imaging (no mass with rapid rise or washout kinetics). Patients underwent marker-directed stereotactic multiple-core needle biopsy of the tumor bed with marker placement before breast-conservation surgery. End points were negative predictive value (NPV) and sensitivity of the biopsy. A total of 105 patients were enrolled with 101 evaluable (mean [SD] age, 52.8 [10.5] years); 77 patients (76.2%) were younger than 60 years, and all breast cancer subtypes were represented with 32 (31.7%) triple-negative breast cancer, 21 (20.8%) hormone receptor-positive/epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2; formerly HER2)-negative (ERBB2-) breast cancer, and 46 (45.5%) ERBB2-positive (ERBB2+) breast cancer. In 101 evaluable patients, 36 had residual disease at surgery (pCR = 64%). With imaging criteria, NPV of the biopsy was 78.3% (95% CI, 67.9%-86.6%), and the sensitivity of the biopsy was 50% (95% CI, 32.9%-67.1%). In an exploratory subset analysis, the NPV in patients with ERBB2+ breast cancer was 90% (95% CI, 76.3%-97.2%). On retrospective central review, 62 of 101 enrolled patients met imaging eligibility criteria. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, NPV in these patients was 86.8% (95% CI, 74.7%-94.5%). These findings do not support breast conservation treatment without surgery based on the study criteria for cCR and rCR/near rCR by trimodality imaging and negative tumor-bed biopsy. Strict adherence to imaging criteria may be required to achieve acceptable predictive values. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03188393.

Breast cancer affects 1/8 of women throughout their lifetimes, with over 90% of cancer deaths being caused by metastasis. However, metastasis poses unique challenges to research, as complex changes in the microenvironment in different metastatic sites and difficulty obtaining tissue for study hinder the ability to examine in depth the changes that occur during metastasis. Rapid autopsy programs thus fill a unique need in advancing metastasis research. Here, we describe our protocol and processes for establishing and improving the US-based Hope for OTHERS (Our Tissue Helping Enhance Research and Science) program for organ donation in metastatic breast cancer. As of August 2024, we consented 114 patients and performed 37 autopsies, from which we collected 551 unique metastatic frozen tumor samples, 1244 FFPE blocks, 90 longitudinal liquid biopsy samples and developed 14 patient-derived organoid and 8 patient-derived xenograft models. We report in-depth clinical and histopathological information and discuss extensive new research and novel findings in patient outcomes, metastatic phylogeny, and factors in successful living model development. Our results reveal key logistical and protocol improvements that are uniquely beneficial to certain programs based on identifiable features, such as working closely with patient advocates, methods to rescue RNA quality in cases where tissue quality may degrade due to time delays, as well as guidelines and future expansions of our program.

BackgroundStandard adjuvant treatment of stage III colon cancer (CC) is fluoropyrimidine with oxaliplatin. Recently, stage III was subdivided into low-risk (T1-3, N1) and high-risk (T4 and/or N2), with the benefit of adding oxaliplatin varying across these substages. In this study, we aimed to assess the impact of oxaliplatin on survival outcomes in subdividing stage III CC patients based on T and N staging.Patients and methodsA total of 4942 stage III CC patients were pooled from the three randomized pivotal trials of oxaliplatin. Kaplan–Meier curves, Cox models stratified by study, and interaction tests were used to assess the oxaliplatin effect across subgroups based on T and N stages. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).ResultsThe prevalence of tumor stages was T1-2 12.4%, T3 74.4%, and T4 13.1%; nodal stages were N1 64.7% and N2 35.3%. A significant OS benefit from oxaliplatin was seen only in T3 (5-year OS = 77.2% versus 73.0%, P < 0.001): T3N1 (hazard ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.85, P < 0.001) and T3N2 (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.69-0.95, P = 0.010). No benefit was observed for T1-2 (5-year OS = 87.8% versus 88.7%, P = 0.644) or T4 patients (5-year OS = 62.6% versus 60.2%, P = 0.648). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant interaction between T stage and the effect of oxaliplatin treatment on OS, whereas no such interaction was observed for N stage.ConclusionsOur analysis revealed that oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy offers a significant survival benefit in stage III CC patients with T3 tumors. In contrast, no survival benefit was observed for T1-2 or T4 patients. These results suggested that T stage plays a more crucial role than N stage in predicting treatment benefit, highlighting the need for tailored treatment strategies based on tumor characteristics.

Novel selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) are a promising therapeutic option under investigation for patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. The efficacy of novel SERDs in the treatment of advanced disease has prompted investigation into their use in the early disease setting, to reduce breast cancer recurrence. Here, we describe the design and rationale of the phase III, randomized, open-label CAMBRIA-1 and CAMBRIA-2 studies. CAMBRIA-1 and CAMBRIA-2 are comparing the next-generation oral SERD camizestrant versus standard-of-care endocrine therapy (aromatase inhibitors or tamoxifen) in patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative early breast cancer, who are at intermediate or high risk of disease recurrence. CAMBRIA-1 is comparing 5 years of camizestrant versus endocrine therapy in patients who have already received 2-5 years of standard endocrine therapy, with or without cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, and are without recurrence. CAMBRIA-2 is comparing 7 years of upfront adjuvant camizestrant versus endocrine therapy, with abemaciclib permitted in both treatment arms for the first 2 years. The primary endpoint for both studies is invasive breast cancer-free survival. Secondary endpoints include invasive disease-free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics, patient-reported outcomes, safety and tolerability.Tweetable abstract: CAMBRIA-1 and CAMBRIA-2 are ongoing, randomized, open-label trials of adjuvant camizestrant, either as an upfront treatment or as a treatment after standard endocrine therapy, in patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer at intermediate to high risk of disease recurrence.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05774951 (CAMBRIA-1); NCT05952557 (CAMBRIA-2).

Adjuvant ovarian function suppression (OFS) with oral endocrine therapy improves outcomes for premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer but adds adverse effects. A genomic biomarker for selecting patients most likely to benefit from OFS-based treatment is lacking. To assess the predictive and prognostic performance of the Breast Cancer Index (BCI) for OFS benefit in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. This prospective-retrospective translational study used all available tumor tissue samples from female patients from the Suppression of Ovarian Function Trial (SOFT). These individuals were randomized to receive 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen alone, tamoxifen plus OFS, or exemestane plus OFS. BCI testing was performed blinded to clinical data and outcome. The a priori hypothesis was that BCI HOXB13/IL17BR ratio (BCI[H/I])-high tumors would benefit more from OFS and high BCI portended poorer prognosis in this population. Settings spanned multiple centers internationally. Participants included premenopausal female patients with HR+ early breast cancer with specimens in the International Breast Cancer Study Group tumor repository available for RNA extraction. Data were collected from December 2003 to April 2021 and were analyzed from May 2022 to October 2022. Primary end points were breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) for the predictive analysis and distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI) for the prognostic analyses. Tumor specimens were available for 1718 of the 3047 female patients in the SOFT intention-to-treat population. The 1687 patients (98.2%) who had specimens that yielded sufficient RNA for BCI testing represented the parent trial population. The median (IQR) follow-up time was 12 (10.5-13.4) years, and 512 patients (30.3%) were younger than 40 years. Tumors were BCI(H/I)-low for 972 patients (57.6%) and BCI(H/I)-high for 715 patients (42.4%). Patients with tumors classified as BCI(H/I)-low exhibited a 12-year absolute benefit in BCFI of 11.6% from exemestane plus OFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.33-0.71]) and an absolute benefit of 7.3% from tamoxifen plus OFS (HR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.48-0.97]) relative to tamoxifen alone. In contrast, patients with BCI(H/I)-high tumors did not benefit from either exemestane plus OFS (absolute benefit, -0.4%; HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.70-1.53]; P for interaction = .006) or tamoxifen plus OFS (absolute benefit, -1.2%; HR, 1.05 [95% CI, 0.72-1.54]; P for interaction = .11) compared with tamoxifen alone. BCI continuous index was significantly prognostic in the N0 subgroup for DRFI (n = 1110; P = .004), with 12-year DRFI of 95.9%, 90.8%, and 86.3% in BCI low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk N0 cancers, respectively. In this prospective-retrospective translational study of patients enrolled in SOFT, BCI was confirmed as prognostic in premenopausal women with HR+ breast cancer. The benefit from OFS-containing adjuvant endocrine therapy was greater for patients with BCI(H/I)-low tumors than BCI(H/I)-high tumors. BCI(H/I)-low status may identify premenopausal patients who are likely to benefit from this more intensive endocrine therapy.

Abstract Background The PALLAS trial investigated the addition of palbociclib to standard adjuvant endocrine therapy reduces breast cancer recurrence. This pre-specified analysis was conducted to determine whether adjuvant palbociclib benefited patients diagnosed with lower risk stage IIA disease compared to those with higher stage disease. Methods PALLAS was an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III trial, representing a public-private partnership between Pfizer, the Austrian Breast Cancer Study Group and, the U.S. ALLIANCE Foundation. Patients diagnosed with stage II-III, hormone-receptor-positive, HER2/neu negative breast cancer who were within 12 months of diagnosis, and had completed all definitive therapy aside from endocrine therapy, which was started within 6 months prior to study entry. All patients were required to submit a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor block. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive standard adjuvant endocrine therapy (of physicians’ choice) for at least 5 years with or without 2 years of Palbociclib, administered orally at a starting dose of 125 mg daily, given for 21 days followed by a 7-day break. Results A total of 5,796 patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer (including 1,010 with stage IIA) were enrolled. Median follow-up was 50 months for stage IIA patients and 43.1 months overall. In the stage IIA cohort, four-year iDFS in the palbociclib arm was 92.9% versus 92.1% for ET alone (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.48–1.19, p = 0.23). There was no differential benefit by histologic grade, chemotherapy receipt, age, or anatomic/clinical risk. Additionally, no benefit to palbociclib was seen in this cohort in invasive breast cancer-free survival (iBCFS), locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), distant relapse-free survival (DRFS), or overall survival (OS). For the stage IIB/III patients, 4-year iDFS was 85.3% for palbociclib + ET versus 83.6% for ET alone (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.77–1.07, p = 0.24). Conclusions and Relevance: While there were substantial differences in outcome for stage IIA versus IIB/III patients at 4 years of follow-up, the addition of 2 years of palbociclib did not improve outcomes for patients, regardless of stage. Trial Registration: The study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov on July 31, 2015, and was assigned the clinical trial number (NCT02513394).