- Research Article
- 10.1007/s00431-026-06887-6
Non-invasive high-frequency oscillation ventilation versus nasal CPAP as primary respiratory support in preterm neonates ≥ 30weeks with RDS: a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.
- Mar 25, 2026
- European journal of pediatrics
- Padamata Likhitha + 4 more +4
In preterm neonates of ≥ 30weeks' gestation with RDS, NHFOV delivered through NM at equivalent pressures is non-inferior to CPAP when used as primary NRS. The finding of shorter NRS duration with NHFOV needs to be proven in adequately powered trials. Use of NM interface with equivalent pressures addresses the lacunae in the current literature on NHFOV and provides a rigorous comparison between the two NRS modes. www.ctri.nic.in , id CTRI/2024/10/074939, registered on 8 October 2024. • CPAP as initial respiratory support for preterm neonates with RDS is the standard of care in LMICs. • NHFOV is more efficacious than CPAP when used as a post-extubation respiratory support modality, evidence for the same being uncertain when used as primary support. • NHFOV is non-inferior to CPAP as primary support in preterm neonates ≥ 30weeks with RDS for the outcomes of treatment failure and IMV requirement with equivalent pressures after lung recruitment and nasal mask interface. • A superiority design RCT comparing these two non-invasive respiratory support modalities in this subgroup of preterm neonates may not be feasible. The low baseline event rate of IMV necessitates an impractically large sample size to achieve adequate power.
Read more