Southern California Orthopedic Institute

Introducción: El campo de la neuroestimulación para el tratamiento del dolor crónico es un área de la medicina en rápido desarrollo. Aunque las terapias de neuroestimulación han avanzado significativamente como resultado de las mejoras tecnológicas; la planificación quirúrgica, la colocación del dispositivo y la atención posoperatoria son de igual importancia para optimizar los resultados. Este proyecto del Comité de Consenso sobre la Adecuación de la Neuroestimulación (NACC, por sus siglas en inglés) pretende proporcionar orientación basada en la evidencia que a menudo se pasa por alto para estas áreas de la práctica de la neuroestimulación.Materiales y métodos: Los autores se eligieron en función de su experiencia clínica, familiaridad con la literatura revisada por pares, productividad de la investigación y contribuciones a la literatura sobre neuromodulación. Los líderes de sección supervisaron las búsquedas bibliográficas en MEDLINE, BioMed Central, Current Contents Connect, Embase, Internatio-nal Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of Science, Google Scholar y PubMed desde la última publicación de NACC en 2017 hasta el presente. Los estudios identificados se calificaron utilizando los criterios del Grupo de trabajo de servicios preventivos de los Estados Unidos para la evidencia y la certeza del beneficio neto. Las recomendaciones se basan en la solidez de la evidencia y el consenso cuando la evidencia era escasa.Resultados: Este proyecto NACC brinda orientación sobre la evaluación preoperatoria, las técnicas intraoperatorias y el manejo posoperatorio en forma de puntos de consenso con apoyo en la evidencia. Estos resultados se basan en el grado de evidencia, la fuerza del consenso y la opinión de expertos.Conclusiones: El NACC ha brindado orientación para un plan quirúrgico que abarca la atención del paciente desde la etapa de planificación hasta la experiencia quirúrgica y la atención posoperatoria. Las recomendaciones generales están diseñadas para mejorar la eficacia y la seguridad de estos procedimientos de neuromodulación a los que se someten los pacientes y están destinadas a aplicarse en toda la comunidad internacional.

Background:Despite marked improvements in stability after lateral ankle ligament repair, many patients do not return to their preinjury activity level. There are few studies addressing athletes’ assessment of their ability to return to play after lateral ankle ligament reconstruction for recurrent instability.Purpose:To determine the rate of return to the preinjury activity level among physically active patients after the modified Broström procedure (MBP) for recurrent lateral ankle instability.Study Design:Case series; Level of evidence, 4.Methods:Included were patients who had undergone a primary MBP by a single surgeon over a 6-year period and had a minimum 24 months of follow-up. A telephone questionnaire was conducted to ascertain the patient’s ability to return to sport and/or work activity at final follow-up. Activity levels were evaluated utilizing the Tegner activity score. Outcome scores and other measured variables were compared between patients who returned to their preinjury level and those who did not. The reasons for failing to return were also documented.Results:Of the 59 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 41 (69%; 20 men and 21 women) participated in the telephone interview. Results indicated that 22 (54%) returned to their prior level of activity (returners). The mean age of returners was 27.2 years; for nonreturners, the mean age was 27.1 years. Most patients (36/41; 88%) were satisfied with surgery and the overall outcome. Of the 19 nonreturners, 7 (37%) noted ankle-related reasons for not returning (pain: 57%; residual instability: 29%; decreased range of motion: 14%), and 12 (63%) cited non–ankle-related reasons. The mean preinjury and postoperative Tegner score for returners was 6.8. Moreover, 7 of 14 (50%) high-level athletes with preinjury Tegner scores ≥8 returned to their preinjury activity level. For high-level athletes who did not return to their previous level, the mean postoperative Tegner score was 6.6, and only 1 (7%) cited an ankle-related reason for not returning.Conclusion:A high patient satisfaction rate was reported after the MBP for recurrent lateral ankle instability. The majority of patients who did not return to their preinjury level cited a non–ankle-related factor as the reason for not returning to sport. This was especially true for the higher level athletes.

The goal of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI TLIF) is to restore and maintain disc height and lordosis until arthrodesis occurs, while minimizing muscle disruption and improving recovery time. The purpose of this study was to compare the radiographic outcomes in patients treated with an articulating expandable spacer in MI TLIF to more traditional static spacers. This was a multi-site, multi-surgeon, Institutional Review Board-exempt, retrospective clinical study from a prospectively collected database. It included 48 patients with a diagnosis of degenerative disc disease (DDD) at one level from L2 to S1 with or without Grade 1 spondylolisthesis who underwent MI TLIF using either an articulating expandable or static interbody spacer. Twenty-seven patients were in the banana-shaped articulating expandable interbody spacer (ALTERA®, Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA) group, while 21 patients were in the static interbody spacer group. Both groups had supplemental posterior pedicle screw and rod fixation. Radiographic records were assessed for disc height, neuroforaminal height, and lordosis at baseline, 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up. The articulating expandable spacer group displayed significantly greater improvement in anterior disc height from baseline compared to the static spacer group at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up by averages of 2.6 mm (79%), 2.8 mm (92%), 3.4 mm (105%), and 3.8 mm (139%), respectively (P<0.05). Mean increases in posterior disc height were significantly greater in the expandable group compared to the static group by 1.2 mm (65%) and 1.7 mm (104%) at 6 months and final follow-up, respectively (P<0.05). Articulating expandable spacers produced significantly greater average improvement by 4.0 mm in neuroforaminal height from baseline to final follow-up compared to static spacers (P<0.05). Increases in intervertebral angle from baseline were significantly greater in the expandable group than in the static group at 3 and 6 months, and final follow-up by averages of 2.5°, 2.8°, and 3.1°, respectively (P<0.05). The articulating expandable spacer group resulted in significantly greater improvements in lumbar lordosis from baseline to 3 and 6 months than the static spacer group by 4.4° and 4.0°, respectively (P<0.05). MI TLIF with articulating expandable interbody spacers provides significant restoration and maintenance of disc height, neuroforaminal height, and lordosis compared to static spacers in this comparative cohort. Long-term clinical outcomes are needed to correlate with these radiographic improvements.

This was a retrospective questionnaire study at a single academic medical center. The objective of this study was to obtain information on rates of return to sport following lumbar fusion as well as sport-specific effects to improve evidence-based preoperative patient counseling. Lumbar spinal fusion is one of the fastest-growing surgical procedures, with the majority being in patients aged 60 years and older. Remaining active is an important consideration for elderly patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. Golf, swimming, and biking are common forms of recreational exercise for an older population in whom lumbar fusion is often performed. There is a lack of data in the current literature regarding rates of return to recreational sporting activities following elective lumbar fusion. Following Institutional Review Board approval, all patients undergoing lumbar fusion at a single institution from 2012 to 2016 were screened and included in this study. A minimum of 1-year postoperative follow-up was required. A total of 117 patients were identified undergoing single-level or multilevel lumbar fusion during this time period. The average age was 63 years. Questionnaires were obtained to screen and identify patients who participated in 1 of 3 recreational sports before surgery (golf, swimming, and biking). Preoperative and postoperative collected outcome measures were then compared using the Student t test. Of the 117 identified lumbar fusion patients, 32 patients (27%) participated in 1 of the 3 most common recreational sporting activities of golf, swimming, or biking. Within the golf cohort (n=13), 100% of patients returned to recreational golfing postoperatively. There was a statistically significant reduction in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores postoperatively (6.3±3.7-1.8±2.4, P=0.01). Driving distance was reduced postoperatively (223.3±42.7-212.1±44.4 yards, P=0.042) and handicaps increased (12.8±8.4-17.0±11.4, P=0.02). Within the swimming cohort (n=9), 100% of patients returned to recreational swimming following lumbar fusion. There was a statistically significant reduction in VAS pain scores postoperatively (9.1±1.7-2.2±2.3, P=0.01). There was a trend towards increased amounts of swimming (times per week) postoperatively, however, this was not statistically significant (2.1±1.7-3.7±1.5, P=0.10). Within the biking cohort (n=10), 100% of patients returned to recreational biking following lumbar fusion. There was a statistically significant reduction in VAS pain scores postoperatively (6.7±4.0-1.3±1.7, P=0.03). There was a trend towards increased amounts of biking (times per week) postoperatively, however, this was not statistically significant (2.5±1.8-3.7±1.6 postoperatively, P=0.20). In the cohort of patients from this study who partook in golfing, swimming or bicycling, 100% were able to return to their respective sport by 3-9 months postoperatively and all had a significant reduction in pain. With regards to golfers, lumbar fusion likely has an adverse effect on their golfing ability with an increase in handicap and an expected reduction in driving distance.