Städtisches Klinikum Dresden

Handheld ultrasound (HHUS) devices are increasingly used in clinical practice due to their portability and cost-effectiveness. However, HHUS image quality remains variable, and a standardized expert-based evaluation protocol is lacking. This study compares the image quality of B-mode recordings of five HHUS models with a high-end reference system (HEUS) using a blinded assessment to identify differences, covariates, offering a standardized evaluation framework.In this blinded, multi-center study, video sequences of the liver, pancreas, and sigmoid colon were recorded in ten volunteers using 5 HHUS devices - Vscan Air, Butterfly iQ+, Philips Lumify, Clarius C3, and Clarius C3 HD3 - and one HEUS (GE Logiq E10). Twenty-two physicians with many years of abdominal ultrasound experience rated blinded clips for 5 image quality parameters.The HEUS consistently received the highest ratings. Image quality differed significantly between HHUS devices. Clarius systems showed the smallest deviation from the reference, followed by Vscan Air and Philips Lumify. All image parameters significantly correlated with the overall impression, without a single dominant factor. The patients' BMI had no relevant influence. Examiner experience was less impactful than device familiarity and personal preference.The image quality of HEUS remained superior to all tested HHUS devices. Further subdivision of image quality aspects did not provide additional information. Furthermore, we could not identify significant covariates in our setup. These findings could justify simplified setups with reduced questionnaires and requirements for examiners.

Abstract Background: Current data support that metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer offers distinct treatment options targeting both the hormone receptor and the HER2-pathway. This might lead to increased treatment efficacy with the potential of omitting chemotherapy in these patients. The aim of the randomized multicenter phase III DETECT V trial was to analyze the efficacy of chemotherapy free and CDK4/6 inhibitor containing treatment strategies compared to current standard treatment. Methods: Between 09/2015 and 11/2022, 271 patients with HER2+ and HR+ MBC in the 1st-3rd line setting were randomized 1:1 to receive trastuzumab and pertuzumab combined with either endocrine therapy or chemotherapy followed by maintenance therapy with dual HER2 targeted and endocrine therapy. Chemotherapy and the endocrine agents could be chosen from a variety of available regimens according to physicians’ choice. In January 2019, the protocol was amended with the addition of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib to both treatment arms. The primary objective of DETECT V was to compare tolerability between the treatment arms, and secondary objectives comprised the comparison of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety, as well as the evaluation of the effect of adding ribociclib to both treatment arms. Here we report results of the final efficacy analyses as based on the modified ITT set of 262 patients (9 patients did not receive any study treatment and were excluded). Of these, 120 patients were recruited before the addition of ribociclib (59 and 61 patients in the chemotherapy-free and chemotherapy-containing treatment arm, respectively), and 142 patients were recruited after the addition of ribociclib (73 and 69 patients in the chemotherapy-free and chemotherapy-containing treatment arm, respectively). Results: Median patient age was 60 years, 202 (77.1%) of patients were in the first line setting and 137 (52.3%) patients had a metastasis-free interval (from primary diagnosis) exceeding 12 months. The overall comparison between all patients receiving chemotherapy-free and chemotherapy-containing treatment showed no significant difference with regard to OS and PFS (median OS not reached vs 46.1 months, HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.60 - 1.59, p = 0.93; median PFS 19.5 vs 23.0 months, HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.82 - 1.62, p = 0.42). However, both OS and PFS were significantly improved by the (non-randomized) addition of ribociclib (OS: median OS not reached vs 46.1 months, HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.26 - 0.72, p = 0.001; PFS: median PFS 29.7 vs 15.6 months, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.34 - 0.67, p < 0.001). A separate analysis for the two treatment arms showed that the addition of ribociclib to chemotherapy-containing treatment significantly improved both OS (median OS not reached vs 38.7 months, HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.14 - 0.64, p = 0.002) and PFS (median PFS 33.1 vs 15.4 months, HR 0.35, 95% CI 0.21 - 0.59, p < 0.001), while the addition of ribociclib to chemotherapy-free treatment significantly improved PFS (median PFS 27.2 vs 15.6 months, HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38 - 0.98, p = 0.040) but not OS (median OS not reached in both groups, HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.30 - 1.23, p = 0.163). An exploratory cross-cohort comparison revealed significantly improved outcome for patients receiving chemotherapy-free treatment plus ribociclib vs chemotherapy-containing treatment without ribociclib (OS: median OS not reached vs 38.7 months, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.24 - 0.94, p = 0.033; PFS: median PFS 27.2 vs 15.4 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33 - 0.85, p = 0.008). Conclusion: Our results suggest that chemotherapy-free treatment for patients with HER2+ and HR+ MBC may be a valuable and effective treatment alternative, and may improve survival with the addition of ribociclib. Citation Format: W. Janni, T. Fehm, V. Müller, J. Blohmer, A. De Gregorio, T. Decker, A. Hartkopf, N. Ditsch, M. Schmidt, P. Wimberger, T. Engler, M. Banys-Paluchowski, P. A. Fasching, B. Rack, A. Schneeweiss, K. Pantel, T. W. Friedl, F. Schochter, J. Huober. Efficacy Analysis of the Randomized Phase III DETECT V trial: Treatment De-escalation by Omission of Chemotherapy and the Effect of Adding Ribociclib in HER2-positive and Hormone-receptor Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr RF4-02.

Left panel: Scheme of the XPAG-immune thrombocytopenia trial. The dexamethasone (DEX) arm consisted of DEX 40 mg/day for days 1-4 for one to three cycles every 28 days to a maximum of 12 weeks, cycles 2 + 3 were optional. Patients randomised to eltrombopag (ETB) + DEX received eltrombopag in combination with a short course of high-dose DEX beginning on day 1 (40 mg/day during days 1-4). The starting dose of ETB was 50 mg/day for 2 weeks; thereafter, the ETB dose was increased by 25 mg for all patients who did not achieve the target platelet count of ≥50 × 109/L. The ETB tapering was performed by decreasing the dose by 25 mg every 2 weeks to a minimum dose of 25 mg every other day for all patients. Right upper panel: Clinical outcomes in patients treated with first-line ETB + DEX. Patients displayed a qualitatively longer response duration and qualitatively reduced usage of rescue medication. Right lower panel: The immunological T-cell response was different in treatment responders and non-responders. Patients with sustained response (responders) displayed a high T-cell clonality at baseline. Clones are depicted as bubbles (right side).

The treatment of methamphetamine use disorder (MUD) poses a significant challenge due to high rates of treatment discontinuation, substance use recurrence, and socioeconomic adversity. ‘Mummy, think of me’ (MAMADAM, an acronym from the German “Mama, denk an mich”), a treatment program specifically designed for pregnant women and young mothers with substance use disorders, has shown positive results regarding treatment efficacy and retention of child custody. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term sustainability of the MAMADAM intervention, which has not yet been examined. For this retrospective follow-up study, former patients with MUD who were pregnant and/or parenting women at the time of MAMADAM treatment were contacted by telephone. We analyzed whether self-reported abstinence after discharge from MAMADAM was associated with patient characteristics at admission to MAMADAM. Of the 114 eligible women, 39 participated in the follow-up interview, on average, 4.5 years after completing MAMADAM. Of these, 16 (41%) reported sustained abstinence from all addictive substances, excluding tobacco. At 12 and 18 months after discharge from MAMADAM, 9/39 (23%) and 11/39 (28%) women, respectively, reported at least one instance of substance use, including alcohol but excluding tobacco. Women who reported recurrences of substance use were significantly more likely to have more underage children, live apart from at least one minor, and consume methamphetamine for longer before MAMADAM than women with sustained abstinence. Cox regression, controlling for the duration of MAMADAM treatment, indicated that a longer history of methamphetamine use at admission to MAMADAM was associated with a shorter period of abstinence from all addictive substances (excluding tobacco) following discharge. The MAMADAM program is effective and sustainable in supporting long-term abstinence among pregnant and parenting women with MUD, indicating that pregnancy and parenthood can serve as turning points for promoting the necessary behavioral changes for recovery from addiction. Some women remain at elevated risk of relapse due to the vulnerabilities identified in this study. Future research should investigate whether stronger collaborations with government and community agencies can help these women maintain long-term abstinence.