Reply to: Inappropriate Prescribing and Medication Safety in Older Adults.
We appreciate the thoughtful comments of Jin et al. [1] on our prospective longitudinal study of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) and all-cause mortality in community-dwelling older adults [2]. Regarding their concern of under-representation of low socioeconomic status (SES) individuals in our cohort, the Israel Study of Glucose Intolerance, Obesity and Hypertension (GOH Study) is a nationwide cohort drawn from the Central Population Registry, comprising Jewish individuals born between 1912 and 1941. The sample was designed to equally represent sex, ethnic origin, and length of residence [3], as most participants immigrated to Israel in its early days of formation during the 1940s–50s. The diversity of this cohort, comprised of individuals from all SES levels, was maintained over follow-up. In our study sample (third follow-up), 40.1% had fewer than 9 years of education and 43.8% were blue-collar workers (manual and skilled trade occupations, such as agriculture, fishing, craft, manufacturing, repair, construction, transport, cleaning, and packaging). Our findings result from multivariable models that accounted for all sociodemographic variables (e.g., education, occupation, ethnic origin). As noted in our paper [2], the cohort included relatively few cognitively impaired individuals, and we state that our findings apply primarily to relatively healthy older adults living in the community. Frailty was not directly measured, though one of Fried's frailty criteria is low physical activity [4], and 51.6% of our participants reported no leisure-time physical activity. In addition, 24.4% of participants rated their health as “poor” or “very poor”. Importantly, associations between PIP and mortality remained statistically significant even after adjusting for both subjective and objective health measures at baseline, including polypharmacy and chronic conditions. Nonetheless, given our finding of stronger associations between potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and mortality among those with better self-rated health at baseline, our argument that PIP should also be monitored in relatively healthy older adults remains valid. From a public health perspective, we believe that PIP criteria should be implemented in primary care as well, not just in hospitals or long-term care facilities. Early identification and correction of inappropriate prescribing could prevent adverse drug events and subsequent complications, supporting older adults in maintaining their independent lifestyle in the community. We agree with Jin et al. [1] that implicit clinician judgment should complement explicit PIP criteria. For example, the OPERAM (Optimizing thERapy to prevent Avoidable hospital admissions in the Multimorbid elderly) trial [5] showed that more than half of the clinical decision support system (CDSS) alerts for overuse, underuse, or misuse (STOPP/START criteria) were judged not clinically appropriate, and concluded that the involvement of a trained pharmacotherapy team (a physician and a pharmacist) is essential for translating these signals. Notably, the most frequently recommended action was “to stop a drug without a clear indication” (STOPP A1), which requires physician assessment. Finally, we also acknowledged [2] that further investigation into the effects of PIP fluctuations over time on clinical outcomes is warranted. Correction of potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) during follow-up may have attenuated the observed associations with mortality in our study. As for PIMs, non-differential misclassification likely biased results toward the null. It should be noted that deprescribing after an adverse event would not eliminate risk if the event already triggered downstream complications leading to premature mortality. The significant associations with mortality were still observed, despite these limitations, which reinforces the clinical importance of addressing PIP and promoting safe prescribing practices in community-dwelling relatively healthy older adults. We thank Jin et al. [1] for the opportunity to deepen the discussion on the important topic of the adequacy of drug treatment in older adults, and to emphasize our key message: independent older adults living in the community, especially women [6], should not be overlooked, as ensuring safe prescribing in this group has major public health implications. All authors have read and approved of the submission of this manuscript. R.D. contributed to the acquisition of data. L.O., A.C., and R.D. contributed to the study concept and design. L.O., A.C., R.D., and K.L. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. L.O. and A.C. drafted the manuscript. L.O., A.C., R.D., and K.L. contributed to critical revisions of the manuscript for important intellectual content and gave final approval of the final draft. This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree of Liat Orenstein, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Israel. The sponsor had no influence on the design, data collection, analysis, or writing of this article. The authors declare no conflicts of interest. This publication is linked to a related Letter to the Editor by Jin et al. To view this article, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70153.
Read more